Difference between revisions of "LED Online Seminar 2018 - Working Group 5"

From Ledwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Landscape Democracy Challenge 3)
(Landscape Democracy Challenge 3)
Line 220: Line 220:
 
File:LED Assignment4-Isfahan 4.jpg|main actors of this issue are people and government, water usage in Iran is more than global standards and wrong decisions and try to use the water of river in other province with excessive canals and dams construction has caused to this issue.
 
File:LED Assignment4-Isfahan 4.jpg|main actors of this issue are people and government, water usage in Iran is more than global standards and wrong decisions and try to use the water of river in other province with excessive canals and dams construction has caused to this issue.
  
File:LED Assignment4-Isfahan 5.jpg|caption: UN's Sustainable Development Goal?
+
File:LED Assignment4-Isfahan 5.jpg|These issue is so complex that is related to many of UN´s sustainable Development Goals, and on a long term they may affect more. It has effected directly on climate and lives and also sustainability and community.
 +
 
 
</gallery>
 
</gallery>
 
'''Your references:'''
 
'''Your references:'''
*...
+
*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_crisis_in_Iran#Water_crisis
*...
+
*https://www.mehrnews.com/news/2349058/%D8%B2%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AF-%DA%86%DA%AF%D9%88%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%AE%D8%B4%DA%A9-%D8%B4%D8%AF-%D9%88%D9%82%D8%AA%DB%8C-%D9%85%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AA-%DA%86%D9%86%D8%AF%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%B2%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AF-%D8%B1%D8%A7-%D8%AE%D8%B4%DA%A9
 +
*http://www.visualcapitalist.com/extreme-water-shortages-are-expected-to-hit-these-countries-by-2040/
 +
*https://www.mehrnews.com/news/2302137/%D8%AA%D8%A3%D8%AB%DB%8C%D8%B1-%D8%AE%D8%B4%DA%A9%DB%8C-%D8%B2%D8%A7%DB%8C%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%AF-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%AF%DA%AF%DB%8C-%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%AF%D9%85-%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AE%D8%B4%DA%A9%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C-%D8%A2%D8%B3%DB%8C%D8%A8-%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%B1%DA%AF%DB%8C
  
 
=== Landscape Democracy Challenge 4 ===
 
=== Landscape Democracy Challenge 4 ===

Revision as of 10:37, 23 May 2018

--> Back to working group overview

Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!

Assignment 1 - Reading and Synthesizing Core Terminology

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Readings are accessible via the resources page

Step 1: Your Landscape Democracy Manifestoes

Step 2: Define your readings

  • Please add your readings selection for the terminology exercise before April 18:

A: Landscape and Democracy

Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Sieverts, Thomas (2003): Cities without cities. An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. English language ed. London: Spon Press.

B: Concepts of Participation

Davis, Mike (1990): Fortress Los Angeles: The Militarization of Urban Space, From: City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles

David, Harvey (2003): The Right to the City, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Volume 27, Issue 4, pages 939–941

C: Community and Identity

Woodend, Lorayne (2013): A Study into the Practice of Machizukuri, RTPI

URBACT programme, The European Territorial Cooperation programme aiming to foster sustainable integrated urban development across Europe

D: Designing

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities

Wates, Nick: The Community Planning Handbook: How people can shape their cities, towns & villages in any part of the world (2nd ed 2014, Routledge)

E: Communicating a Vision

Potteiger, Matthew, and Jamie Purinton. 1998. Landscape narratives: design practices for telling stories. New York: J. Wiley. GoogleBook

Lejano, Raul P., Mrill Ingram, and Helen M. Ingram. 2013. The power of narrative in environmental networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Steps 3 and 4: Concepts Selection and definition

  • Each group member selects three relevant concepts derived from his/her readings and synthesize them/publish them on the wiki by May 9, 2018
  • Group members reflect within their groups and define their chosen concepts into a shared definition to be posted on the wiki by June 6, 2018.
  • Other group members will be able to comment on the definitions until June 12, 2018
  • Each group will also report on their process to come to a set of shared definitions of key landscape democracy concepts on the wiki documentation until June 20, 2018

Concepts and definitions

Author 1: Kazi Zayed Titumir

  • (A:Community identity formation in pontchartrain park:Journal of Urban History 39:36,Gafford, Farrah D. (2013))

Communal bondings are the most important for neighbourhood The interrelation between community and neighborhood provide opportunities to individual and family to develop their skill and knowledge. And also it boosts the self esteem, responsibility, and belongingness toward the community.

  • (B:Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness: Hester, Randolph)

Isolation from the world creates immense impact on our brain Disassociation with the world gives us the feeling of freedom. But, the impact for very short period. Whether, it has a tremendous long term impact on us. Separation from nature, environment and community gives us a negative effect on everything.

  • (C: A Refrain with a View, UC Berkeley, Hester, Randolph (1999))

Participatory action equalizes power Participatory approach, mainly reduces the dependency on administrative people. It segregates all the workload and liabilities on stakeholder, so that, they can propose what exactly their demands are. It creates the balance. Author 2: Mastaneh Mahfouzi

  • ( A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain: Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful? in Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012))

Different perception of landscape landscape is a subjective reality, a certain landscape Scene can convey different meanings and feelings to different people due to their personality, culture,pre-expectation and etc. So different observers have different ideas about a certain place, in consequence, everyone has not the same charming place in mind.

  • (B: Concepts of Participation: Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press )

simultaneously cooperation of designers and owners Emotion demands are the invisible level of life, But also one of the most important and fundamental features in designing. in order to consider this feature of life, it's crucial that professionals and designers work simultaneously with users in order to reach subtle qualities and also provide all needs and demands of owners.

  • (C:Designing: Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness)

Satisfaction through sustainability: Sustainability can bring satisfaction for residents of a city in different aspects. A sustainable city should include three distinctive traits: enabling form, resilient form and impelling form. enabling form:We need new forms of habitation that let us feel, understand and empathize with the multiple roles in our ecosystems

Resilient form: In order to consider resiliently in a city at the scale of land use, They should be less dependent on nonrenewable energy sources.

Impelling Form: Impelling form should offer alternatives, be simple enough to comprehend


Author 3: Atiye Asadiha

  • (Woodend, Lorayne (2013): A Study into the Practice of Machizukuri)

The importance of an understanding of the historic, cultural and recognizing and capitalizing upon the benefits and contributions of the multiple activities of communities towards the common aims of sustainability.

  • (Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Place-making Builds Places and Communities)

The best forms of community engagement, and in fact the best forms of place-making, are those that recognize and exploit the virtuous cycle of mutual stewardship between community and place.

  • (Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure, Landscape Ecology, vol. 10 no. 4)

humans not only construct and manage landscapes, they also look at them, and they make decisions based upon what they see (and know, and feel). This dynamic helps to explain landscape structure as both an effect of culture and as an artifact that changes culture.


Author 4: ...

  • ......
  • .......
  • .......

Author 5: Oleksandr Galychyn

  • Imaginable landscapes are the path dependent single or multiple symbolic orderings (common assemblage networks) within specific community that pass to the the next generation as generalized knowledge through human or (non-human) mediator to foster a sense of community among the individuals.
  • The debates the regarding the Right to the City open of question for the establishment of the new urban actor-civic society as a mediator in the participatory governance model to open a road towards an 'inclusive city'. An application of such actor to the urban planning process creates an opportunity for the realization of the spatially just society; therefore, the spatially just community is a community that both employs a participatory governance model at the local level and surpasses formal/informal functional restrictions towards the mutual partnership of during the neighborhoods lifecycle
  • The 町造り(Machizukuri) can be perceived as the process of 'space making' that involve the local (urban) participatory network of residents and non-profit organization (research institutes, universities) organized for the entire urban lifecycle in accordance with the principles of innovation, knowledge and learning . The community involvement in the fusion of planning and design placed in the center of aspect the central role since design absent in the USA communities. Japanese perceive the community design process as the management and maintenance of infrastructural networks between buildings and the urban space during the entire lifecycle to preserve their imaginable landscapes as a collective identity for the future generations.

Step 5: Reflection

Step 6: Revised manifestoes

  • please look again at your initial manifestoes and update them with any new aspects/prespectives you have taken up during this seminar

Assignment 2 - Your Landscape Symbols

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

Landscape Symbols Author 1: ...

Landscape Symbols Author 2: ...

Landscape Symbols Auther 3: ...

Landscape Symbols Author 4: ...

Landscape Symbols Author 5: ...

Assignment 3 - Role Play on Landscape Democracy "movers and shakers"

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

Oleksandr Galychyn: Prof. Marc Francis (how public participation in planning and design triggered durable social networks in Village Homes in Davis)

Assignment 4 - Your Landscape Democracy Challenge

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Each group member will specify a landscape democracy challenge in his/her environment
  • Each Landscape Democracy Challenge should be linked to two or three of UN's 17 sustainable development Goals


Landscape Democracy Challenge 1

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 3

Your references:

Landscape Democracy Challenge 4

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 5_OLEKSANDR GALYCHYN

Your references:

  • Public policies for Scampia neighborhood in Naples, NEHOM ( Neighborhood Housing Models), 2003.
  • Gizzi S. Problems of Sails, published in Castagnaro A. , Lavaggi A. Proceedings of Conference: What to do with

Sails of Scampia? Giannini; 2011. p.31-34

Assignment 5 - Your Democratic Change Process

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • After documenting and reflecting on your challenges you will continue jointly with one of these challenges and design a democratic change process

Your Democratic Change Process

Reflection

  • ....
  • ....
  • ....

Conclusion:

  • ....
  • ....
  • ....

Your references

  • ...
  • ...
  • ...