LED Online Seminar 2018 - Working Group 5

From Ledwiki
Jump to: navigation, search

--> Back to working group overview

Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!

Assignment 1 - Reading and Synthesizing Core Terminology

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Readings are accessible via the resources page

Step 1: Your Landscape Democracy Manifestoes

Step 2: Define your readings

  • Please add your readings selection for the terminology exercise before April 18:

A: Landscape and Democracy

Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Sieverts, Thomas (2003): Cities without cities. An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. English language ed. London: Spon Press.

B: Concepts of Participation

Davis, Mike (1990): Fortress Los Angeles: The Militarization of Urban Space, From: City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles

David, Harvey (2003): The Right to the City, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Volume 27, Issue 4, pages 939–941

C: Community and Identity

Woodend, Lorayne (2013): A Study into the Practice of Machizukuri, RTPI

URBACT programme, The European Territorial Cooperation programme aiming to foster sustainable integrated urban development across Europe

D: Designing

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities

Wates, Nick: The Community Planning Handbook: How people can shape their cities, towns & villages in any part of the world (2nd ed 2014, Routledge)

E: Communicating a Vision

Potteiger, Matthew, and Jamie Purinton. 1998. Landscape narratives: design practices for telling stories. New York: J. Wiley. GoogleBook

Lejano, Raul P., Mrill Ingram, and Helen M. Ingram. 2013. The power of narrative in environmental networks. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Steps 3 and 4: Concepts Selection and definition

  • Each group member selects three relevant concepts derived from his/her readings and synthesize them/publish them on the wiki by May 9, 2018
  • Group members reflect within their groups and define their chosen concepts into a shared definition to be posted on the wiki by June 6, 2018.
  • Other group members will be able to comment on the definitions until June 12, 2018
  • Each group will also report on their process to come to a set of shared definitions of key landscape democracy concepts on the wiki documentation until June 20, 2018

Concepts and definitions

Author 1: Kazi Zayed Titumir

  • (A:Community identity formation in pontchartrain park:Journal of Urban History 39:36,Gafford, Farrah D. (2013))

Communal bondings are the most important for neighbourhood The interrelation between community and neighborhood provide opportunities to individual and family to develop their skill and knowledge. And also it boosts the self esteem, responsibility, and belongingness toward the community.

  • (B:Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness: Hester, Randolph)

Isolation from the world creates immense impact on our brain Disassociation with the world gives us the feeling of freedom. But, the impact for very short period. Whether, it has a tremendous long term impact on us. Separation from nature, environment and community gives us a negative effect on everything.

  • (C: A Refrain with a View, UC Berkeley, Hester, Randolph (1999))

Participatory action equalizes power Participatory approach, mainly reduces the dependency on administrative people. It segregates all the workload and liabilities on stakeholder, so that, they can propose what exactly their demands are. It creates the balance.


Author 2: Mastaneh Mahfouzi

  • ( A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain: Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful? in Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012))

Different perception of landscape landscape is a subjective reality, a certain landscape Scene can convey different meanings and feelings to different people due to their personality, culture,pre-expectation and etc. So different observers have different ideas about a certain place, in consequence, everyone has not the same charming place in mind.

  • (B: Concepts of Participation: Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press )

simultaneously cooperation of designers and owners Emotion demands are the invisible level of life, But also one of the most important and fundamental features in designing. in order to consider this feature of life, it's crucial that professionals and designers work simultaneously with users in order to reach subtle qualities and also provide all needs and demands of owners.

  • (C:Designing: Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness)

Satisfaction through sustainability: Sustainability can bring satisfaction for residents of a city in different aspects. A sustainable city should include three distinctive traits: enabling form, resilient form and impelling form. enabling form:We need new forms of habitation that let us feel, understand and empathize with the multiple roles in our ecosystems

Resilient form: In order to consider resiliently in a city at the scale of land use, They should be less dependent on nonrenewable energy sources.

Impelling Form: Impelling form should offer alternatives, be simple enough to comprehend


Author 3: Atiye Asadiha

  • (Woodend, Lorayne (2013): A Study into the Practice of Machizukuri)

The importance of an understanding of the historic, cultural and recognizing and capitalizing upon the benefits and contributions of the multiple activities of communities towards the common aims of sustainability.

  • (Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Place-making Builds Places and Communities)

The best forms of community engagement, and in fact the best forms of place-making, are those that recognize and exploit the virtuous cycle of mutual stewardship between community and place.

  • (Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure, Landscape Ecology, vol. 10 no. 4)

humans not only construct and manage landscapes, they also look at them, and they make decisions based upon what they see (and know, and feel). This dynamic helps to explain landscape structure as both an effect of culture and as an artifact that changes culture.


Author 4: ...

  • ......
  • .......
  • .......

Author 5: Oleksandr Galychyn

  • Imaginable landscapes are the path dependent single or multiple symbolic orderings (common assemblage networks) within specific community that pass to the the next generation as generalized knowledge through human or (non-human) mediator to foster a sense of community among the individuals.
  • The debates the regarding the Right to the City open of question for the establishment of the new urban actor-civic society as a mediator in the participatory governance model to open a road towards an 'inclusive city'. An application of such actor to the urban planning process creates an opportunity for the realization of the spatially just society; therefore, the spatially just community is a community that both employs a participatory governance model at the local level and surpasses formal/informal functional restrictions towards the mutual partnership of during the neighborhoods lifecycle
  • The 町造り(Machizukuri) can be perceived as the process of 'space making' that involve the local (urban) participatory network of residents and non-profit organization (research institutes, universities) organized for the entire urban lifecycle in accordance with the principles of innovation, knowledge and learning . The community involvement in the fusion of planning and design placed in the center of aspect the central role since design absent in the USA communities. Japanese perceive the community design process as the management and maintenance of infrastructural networks between buildings and the urban space during the entire lifecycle to preserve their imaginable landscapes as a collective identity for the future generations.

Step 5: Reflection

Isolation from the world creates an immense impact on our brain : Globalisation has disconnected the people from the immediate environment by virtual connection to the local community instead of direct interaction. The virtual interaction contributes to the lower levels of public participation due to the lack of knowledge regarding the details of the context and the lack of computer literacy (kids and aged population), a negative network effect (over-enrolment of users into the network) and health problems associated with this type of activity. Particularly, the isolation occurs in the urban slums and abusive environment where fear of the ‘outside crime’ and an interaction with a poor occurs. The lack of literacy as well as health and mental and maintenance problems became a common occurrence at the long-term perspective. The feeling of safety with the time changes into more profound fear resulting in the barricades and complex security system (gates and fences, security guards, CCTV). The residents without knowledge of the community became as an ‘outsiders’- non-actors that lack qualifications to engage in the planning and design of their community. In other words, the top-down planning and profit maximization prevail while residents being ripped from their benefits (physical, financial esthetical, etc.). Moreover, they lose their status as mediators for future generations; therefore, the poorer sense of community contribute and out-migration and at the long-term perspective the overall decline and with a potential to became an attraction pole of squatters. The social exclusion is the major obstacle to the well-being of the community.

Landscape Knowledge: The continual interactive participation process involves decisions based on local knowledge and experience that shaped before design and planning phase of community building as a means to adapt the community design to the pre-existing social networks, cultural heritage, and local resources and constantly employed by residents in their feedback to community designers. This dynamic processes allows to explain fragmentation of the social network as a result of intrinsic socio-economical and cultural boundaries ( as perceived by residents) within the community landscape and changes this pattern brings to the access and mobilization of community resources, natural and anthropogenic (artefacts) such as facilities and services, thereby making changes in the multi-cultural organization.

Different perception of landscape: While the special landscape knowledge is generalized (common wisdom) to be passed through storytelling by human or non-human mediators to pass to the next generation as a local knowledge to raise awareness regarding the community issues and the local resources (natural and artificial) that community to be able to combat those issues. This generalized knowledge (comprehensive narrative) is shaped from the individual stories for visualization of a whole picture or a detached artifact (fragmented images)- a product (output) of an individual perception. Each community can have multi-cultural organization, each family has each own value, and the nature of relationships and the roles of members within the the same cultural group as well as family, socio-economical group or in generalized sense environment where the person has been born and formed multiple identities are the factors that change the individual perception of a landscape and a the choice of environment to connect, disconnect and re-connect within the social network of the community. For instance, the connection can be virtual and direct depending on the fact if the individual is a foreigner separated from the land of his ancestors or the part of the same community over the course of life. Therefore, before the design and planning a new community of before the renewal of the existing ones its essential to build an inclusive community in the social sense to make a decision on the basis of the complete assemblage of the individual stories that allow to account for the drawback and opportunities in the networked pattern of the neighborhood.

Imaginable landscapes: Imaginable landscapes are historical patterns of trails that ancestors have used to satisfy their common needs (manly sacred, military or food purposes). From the initial abstract ‘diagrams’ of trails and river bands (nature) without any landmarks (artefacts) overlapped with the cosmographical objects (birds, star crosses etc.) invoked by the individuals through memory and dream (mnemonic function) and trance (ceremonial function) to the postcolonial ‘mind maps’ of the common landscape reachable by foot of culturally bounded symbolic landmarks. The later generations have received this generalized knowledge for their survival (for example to find water source by following mountain trails), protection and appreciation of nature (star crosses) and gods as well as the referent points (navigation). Those networks of symbolic images engraved in individual minds (mediator) to pass on the future generations directly or by means of rock art (mediator), namely carvings, paintings or drawings, some of which incorporated not only the celestial realm but also a spatial arrangement. Other mediators can be too fragile to transmit special knowledge. For example, bark, wood or skin wasn’t able to preserve any images. Since the different cultures can inhabit the same land without any linkage to the pre-existing cultures, often the contents are mixed without any comprehensive (generalized) graphical information. The community is more complex than a cultural region since this unit incorporates geographical barriers, the relationship to other cultural regions in terms of a hierarchy of influences as well as artifacts (physical objects). The patterns must be dated back to their origins in relation to the geographical and cultural contexts in which they have carved or painted. Thus, the proper cartographical and cosmographical interpretation is achievable only if the current community members have the deep linkage with their ancestors.

Landscape Project various features: Landscape has different features and different aspects which contain various issues. in a landscape project different people are involved and in order to have a successful project, we should consider all subjects such as historical background and social, Economical, environmental issues. we should be aware of all stakeholders and how they behave. Also, we should consider that landscape is a subjective reality. the landscape is affected by culture and also it can affect culture .so it is difficult to reach a high quality and provide all demands.

Step 6: Revised manifestoes

  • please look again at your initial manifestoes and update them with any new aspects/prespectives you have taken up during this seminar

Assignment 2 - Your Landscape Symbols

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

Landscape Symbols Author 1: ...

Landscape Symbols Author 2: ...

Landscape Symbols Auther 3: ...

Landscape Symbols Author 4: ...

Landscape Symbols Author 5: ...

Assignment 3 - Role Play on Landscape Democracy "movers and shakers"

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

Oleksandr Galychyn: Prof. Marc Francis (how public participation in planning and design triggered durable social networks in Village Homes in Davis)

Assignment 4 - Your Landscape Democracy Challenge

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Each group member will specify a landscape democracy challenge in his/her environment
  • Each Landscape Democracy Challenge should be linked to two or three of UN's 17 sustainable development Goals


Landscape Democracy Challenge 1

Your references:

  • Alexander, Christopher,(1977), Pattern Language
  • Habibi,Mohsen,(2015) Urban renovation

Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 3

Your references:

Landscape Democracy Challenge 4

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 5_OLEKSANDR GALYCHYN

Your references:

  • Public policies for Scampia neighborhood in Naples, NEHOM ( Neighborhood Housing Models), 2003.
  • Gizzi S. Problems of Sails, published in Castagnaro A. , Lavaggi A. Proceedings of Conference: What to do with

Sails of Scampia? Giannini; 2011. p.31-34

Assignment 5 - Your Democratic Change Process

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • After documenting and reflecting on your challenges you will continue jointly with one of these challenges and design a democratic change process

Your Democratic Change Process

Reflection

  • Decision making should be transparent to everyone.
  • The investment of resources should be well distributed.
  • Public participation enhances the possibility of democratic decision.
  • Historical studies of the project is the responsibility of both designers and community. It should be done by residents before the initiation of any change process.
  • Community profiling and photo survey may be very useful for identifying internal factors (stretches and weaknesses) if are based on local knowledge

Conclusion:

  • The financial stakeholder creates the major role.
  • The problem will be unsolved if the tenancy is not secured.
  • We need to establish new policies supporting public participation.
  • The SWOT analysis can be more fitting to the real context if the understanding of the community and data collection involves a combination of methods correspond to the historical limitations and local
  • The community linkage to the pre-existent cultures influence hierarchy decision-making process towards Bottom-Up design

Your references

  • Habibi, M.,& Maghsoudi, M. (2009). Urban Renovation. Tehran: University of Tehran Press
  • Falamaki, M.(2015). Reviving the buildings and historical cities. Tehran. University of Tehran Press.
  • Habibi, M.(2011). DE LA CITE A LA VILLE.Tehran. Tehran University