LED2LEAP 2021 - Nürtingen Team 2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
== Relationships Between Your Actors and Groups == | == Relationships Between Your Actors and Groups == | ||
*While going through the city center of Nürtingen and proceeding over the Neckar bridge, the main stakeholders that you can find are: families and children, students (both domestic and international), tourists, senior citizents, city administration (as the urban part of the city is close to the Neckar river. There is also a tributary Steinach going from the Neckar river where mainly families with their children come and children play. Along side of the Neckar river there is a path that is not perfect, but yet a lot of joggers, cyclists and overall strolling people appear. One of the potential problems could be that there is no division between this group, in which case they disrupt each other. But as for the power, they all correspond to one another and communicate with each other well. But the higher in power is the city administration. | *While going through the city center of Nürtingen and proceeding over the Neckar bridge, the main stakeholders that you can find are: families and children, students (both domestic and international), tourists, senior citizents, city administration (as the urban part of the city is close to the Neckar river. There is also a tributary Steinach going from the Neckar river where mainly families with their children come and children play. Along side of the Neckar river there is a path that is not perfect, but yet a lot of joggers, cyclists and overall strolling people appear. One of the potential problems could be that there is no division between this group, in which case they disrupt each other. But as for the power, they all correspond to one another and communicate with each other well. But the higher in power is the city administration. | ||
All of the stakeholders have the same interest, which is interesting because they are all different and yet they all work together. They all are highly impacted by the democracy challenges. But the highest power has the city administration which can work according to other citizens needs. | *All of the stakeholders have the same interest, which is interesting because they are all different and yet they all work together. They all are highly impacted by the democracy challenges. But the highest power has the city administration which can work according to other citizens needs. | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5"> | <gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5"> | ||
File:Power-mapping.jpg|'' | File:Power-mapping.jpg|''Power mapping of the stakeholders'' | ||
File: | File:Interests of the stakeholders Nurtingen team2.png|''Interests and relationships of the stakeholders'' | ||
File:PlaceholderImage_3.jpg|''insert text here'' | File:PlaceholderImage_3.jpg|''insert text here'' | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 13:29, 21 April 2021
>>>back to working groups overview
For help with editing this Wiki page use this link.
For assignments and key readings use this link.
| Area | City Center and Neckar Bridge | |
| Place | Nürtingen | |
| Country | Germany | |
| Topics | Revitalization and bringing the river back to people | |
| Author(s) | Yara Karazi, Sara dos Santos Figueiredo, Mahasta Mahfouzi, Rabija Hadzimehmedovic | |
| ||
Landscape Democracy Rationale
- insert text here
Location and Scope
Nürtingen Map
Phase A: Mapping Your Community
Welcome to Your Community and Their Landscape
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Groups of Actors and Stakeholders in Your Community
- insert text here
Relationships Between Your Actors and Groups
- While going through the city center of Nürtingen and proceeding over the Neckar bridge, the main stakeholders that you can find are: families and children, students (both domestic and international), tourists, senior citizents, city administration (as the urban part of the city is close to the Neckar river. There is also a tributary Steinach going from the Neckar river where mainly families with their children come and children play. Along side of the Neckar river there is a path that is not perfect, but yet a lot of joggers, cyclists and overall strolling people appear. One of the potential problems could be that there is no division between this group, in which case they disrupt each other. But as for the power, they all correspond to one another and communicate with each other well. But the higher in power is the city administration.
- All of the stakeholders have the same interest, which is interesting because they are all different and yet they all work together. They all are highly impacted by the democracy challenges. But the highest power has the city administration which can work according to other citizens needs.
Power mapping of the stakeholders
Interests and relationships of the stakeholders
insert text here
Summary of Your Learnings from the Transnational Discussion Panel
Theory Reflection
From the resources available from phase A we found some interesting theories that made sense in the context of our chosen Landscape. Them being a)“The right to Landscape” as a way of addressing Human Rights and the well being of the community and b) taking the “socially constructed landscape concept as a starting point”. It gave us a moment of disorientation which made us think about the topics that where missing. We enjoyed to hear about the correlation between landscape, democracy and the local communities and, since we are in a landscape architecture design context, it gives us a new perspective about the planning and the social responsibility that we have as professionals and students. Although it was hard for us to map and understand the necessities of our local community we got there at the end.
a) The concept explains in detail the role of landscape in working towards justice and addressing Human Rights and the well being of the community and “integrate the spiritual and cultural values of land and local communities into landscape and nature conservation and socio-economic needs into sustainable development and as the product of people – environment co-evolution, landscape is at once “a tangible product” of the act of humans’ shaping their surroundings and “intangible process”, making sense of the world through shared meanings and values.(4)
b) By explaining how can inclusiveness be achieve in planning and how people give value to their surroundings. In this case trans-cultural communities can achieve it as result from premeditated and deliberate intervention that follow people. By looking through the communities' necessities we can include all people no matter their religion, ethnicity or social context.(3)
In conclusion, by expanding our concept of human rights in this context of landscape as the process of merging of physical and psychological necessities we offer a new framework for addressing this subject. This can, consequently, generate alternative scenarios for conflict-reduced ideas to landscape use and community wellbeing.
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
References
- insert text here
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
The Scene in Your Story of Analysis
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Actors in Your Story of Analysis
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Story of Analysis
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflect on Your Story of Analysis
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
The Scene in Your Story of Visioning
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Actors in Your Story of Visioning
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Story of Visioning
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflect on Your Story of Visioning
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Evolution of Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Plan Behind Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Realization of Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflect on Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflection on the Online Seminar
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflection on the Living Lab Process
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Your Living Lab Code of Conduct
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Process Reflection
- insert text here