LED Online Seminar 2019 - Working Group 4

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

--> Back to working group overview

Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!

Assignment 1 - Reading and Synthesizing Core Terminology

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Readings are accessible via the resources page

Step 1: Your Landscape Democracy Manifestoes

Step 2: Define your readings

  • Please add your readings selection for the terminology exercise before April 24:

A: Landscape and Democracy

Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful?: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012) (Anna Fernanda Volken)

B: Concepts of Participation

Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press (Adriana Tredici);

Hester, Randolph (2005): Whose Politics (Arati Amitraj Uttur)

C: Community and Identity

Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014. (Anna Fernanda Volken); Woodend, Lorayne (2013): A Study into the Practice of Machizukuri (Arati Amitraj Uttur)

D: Designing

Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy - Everyday Future, The MIT Press (Adriana Tredici);

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making (Arati Amitraj Uttur)

Salgado, Mariana, et al. (2015): Designing with Immigrants (Anna Fernanda Volken)

E: Communicating a Vision

A toolkit for transforming abandoned spaces through the arts. https://issuu.com/mahatat/docs/toolkit_en._final_issuu (Adriana Tredici)

Steps 3 and 4: Concepts Selection and definition

  • Each group member selects three relevant concepts derived from his/her readings and synthesize them/publish them on the wiki by May 15, 2019
  • Group members reflect within their groups and define their chosen concepts into a shared definition to be posted on the wiki by June 12, 2019.
  • Other group members will be able to comment on the definitions until June 30, 2019
  • Each group will also report on their process to come to a set of shared definitions of key landscape democracy concepts on the wiki documentation until July 12, 2019

Concepts and definitions

Author 1:

  • ......
  • .......
  • .......

Author 2: ...

  • ......
  • .......
  • .......


Author 3: Anna Fernanda Volken

Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful?:

• Which parts of our visible environment are included in that which we call landscape, and which other, equally visible phenomena are excluded?

• First scenario - the palette: Landscape is a construct - to be found not in environment, but in the minds eye of those who look - a creative act brought forth by excluding and filtering certain elements, which is influenced by our educational background. Landscape consists in different layers: the merely visual layer of colors, a more complex with hints of natural or technological infrastructures and a layer in which social aspects and hence can be identified. Second scenario - the charming place: the landscape is oriented to the ideal of the charming place created by painting/literature or tourism brochures and advertisements. This is the synonymous to filter out whatever we actually see to be able to integrate the outcome in our preconceived and idealized image of the charming place.

• Do these hypothesis stand up? They do and don't. Each person has a different charming place in mind, which means they filter different elements in order to paint their picture and the outcome is individual - because they have different pasts, impressions and memories. How far can someone distance himself from the ideal image of the landscape without destroying the message “This is a landscape”. In artistic terms, landscape appears to be a construct comprised of conventional visual structures.

Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.

• “Even in fiction film, the authenticity of the landscape plays an active role in the filmic narrative” (...)“It is a space that is carefully constructed, not only through the selection of suitable filming locations but also through the way in which the images are framed by the camera.”

• The film is narrated by the perspective of a 6 year old girl who lives a life that is dictated by her environment and uses her lively imagination to find explanation for what she observes, calling it "the prettiest place on earth". But, at the same time, it is exposed by cameras as dangerous, ugly and decaying, as a result of complex social and ecological processes that the girl cannot comprehend. The film represent a form of slow violence – a process of delayed environmental destruction that is dispersed across time and space - both geographical and socio-economic in nature. It emphasizes the potential risks and dangers that circumscribe human inhabitation of this crisis landscape.

• However the depiction is complicated because we see Bathtub and its resilient people from the perspective of a 6 year old under extreme emotional distress. “It is a good example of a film that uses a real landscape in its narration of a fictional one in order to expose the racial, gender, and economic power dynamics that led to the emergence of the actual crisis landscape in the bayous of Louisiana.”

Salgado, Mariana, et al. (2015): Designing with Immigrants

• Immigration giver rise to global and local changes that challenge social norms and affect our lives. By involving immigrants in design processes, we emphasize designers’ responsibility for social inclusion. Design researchers often tackle issues of social responsibility ineffectively, but with the contribution could be more socially relevant with the necessary support. Issues of immigration are in increasingly important part of the political agenda and of the changing landscapes of cities.

• The way the meetings were staged were more important than the tools and techniques and working with people from different cultural background is not straightforward – the atmosphere created influence in the results. Not only including people from different background is important, but also by talking other parameters such as age, gender, educational level, language skill and social status. Non-language communication is key because they are using their mother tongue language and also because of the emotional nature of the issue of immigration.

• If we consider design a question of problem-defining rather than problem-solving, including immigrants in participatory design processes is key to transformative actions capable of producing social change. Paying attention to trust, empathy, personal and professional relationships and ethics are key to enriching design visions an recognizing design as a social practice.


Author 4: ...

  • ......
  • .......
  • .......

Step 5: Reflection

Step 6: Revised manifestoes

  • please look again at your initial manifestoes and update them with any new aspects/prespectives you have taken up during this seminar

Assignment 2 - Your Landscape Symbols

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

[[File:Example.jpg]]

Landscape Symbols Author 1: Arati Uttur

Landscape Symbols Author 2: Adriana Tredici

Landscape Symbols Author 3: Anna Fernanda Volken

[[Media:File:Example.ogg]]=== Landscape Symbols Author 4: ... ===

Assignment 3 - Role Play on Landscape Democracy "movers and shakers"

Jon Jandai : Co-founder of Pun Pun Center for Self-reliance in Thailand (Arati Uttur)

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

Assignment 4 - Your Landscape Democracy Challenge

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Each group member will specify a landscape democracy challenge in his/her environment

Landscape Democracy Challenge 1

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 3

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 4

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...


Your Democratic Change Process

Reflection

  • ....
  • ....
  • ....

Conclusion:

  • ....
  • ....
  • ....

Your references

  • ...
  • ...
  • ...