LED Online Seminar 2017 - Working Group 12

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

--> Back to working group overview

Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!

Assignment 1 - Reading and Synthesizing Core Terminology

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Readings are accessible via the resources page

Step 1: Your Landscape Democracy Manifestoes

Step 2: Define your readings

  • Please add your readings selection for the terminology exercise before April 12:

A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain


Landscape Concepts:

  • (Reem) Jackson, John Brinckerhoff (1980): "By way of conclusion. How to study the landscape" In: The necessity for ruins, and other topics, 113-126. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Kucan, Ana (2007). Constructing Landscape Conceptions. In: ECLAS (ed.). JoLA spring 2007, 30-41. Munich: Callwey. (Martina)
  • Dani: European Union (Parliament and Council): Water Framework Directive

B: Concepts of Participation

  • (Reem) Arnstein, Sherry R.(1969): A Ladder of Citizen Participation, JAIP, Vol. 35, No. 4
  • Dani: Furco, Andrew (1996): Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education

C: Community and Identity

  • Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.
  • Dani: SEISMIC project, An urban research and innovation project across 10 European countries
  • Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014. (Amirhossein)

D: Designing

  • Kot, Douglas and Ruggeri, Deni: Westport Case Study
  • Dani: Pritzker Prize winning architect Alejandro Aravena on sustainable design and community involvement in Chile

E: Communicating a Vision

  • 'Reading the Landscape' by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu

Steps 3 and 4: Concepts Selection and definition

  • Each group member selects three relevant concepts derived from his/her readings and synthesize them/publish them on the wiki by April 30, 2017
  • Group members reflect within their groups and define their chosen concepts into a shared definition to be posted on the wiki by May 10, 2017.
  • Other group members will be able to comment on the definitions until May 20, 2017

Concepts and definitions

Author 1: Amirhossein Mashayekhifard

  • Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.
    • For Producing narrative films natural and built environment are requisite especially if landscape plays an active role in such films.
  • Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.
    • The prodigious effect of environment in dictating many ways in human's life.
  • Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.
    • Landscape could be defined as a mirror of people's feeling who live in a certain area.

Author 2:

  • ......
  • .......
  • .......

Author 3: Reem Hamdan

  • Concept 1: Citizen participation is a categorical term to citizen power. (Arnstein, Sherry R.(1969): A Ladder of Citizen Participation, JAIP, Vol. 35, No. 4)
    • Citizen participation is a redistibution of power that enables the 'have-not' citizens, presently excluded from the political and economic process, to be deliberately included in the future.
  • Concept 2: Hostility to of the 'have-nots' towards the powerholders. (Arnstein, Sherry R.(1969): A Ladder of Citizen Participation, JAIP, Vol. 35, No. 4
    • Participation without redistribution of power is empty and frustrating process for the powerless. Public programs should be relevant to the have-nots needs and responsive to their priorities.
  • Concept 3: The Grid system allowed for a wonderful flexibility in the use of space. (Jackson, John Brinckerhoff (1980): "By way of conclusion. How to study the landscape" In: The necessity for ruins, and other topics, 113-126. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
    • The grid system allowed for more ideas in planning a space and even a degree of interchangeability for all lots, blocks, all streets to be of uniform dimensions. You can build what you liked, where you liked.

Author 4: Martina Anelli

  • Concept 1: Landscape identity is related to the concept of the nation and it's a social construct (Kucan, Ana (2007). Constructing Landscape Conceptions)
    • Landscapes are perceived by collective memory which is built on symbols, mythologies and social conventions, that influence the way which we perceive the environment and the way we act in this same environment.
  • Concept 2: Increase the community identity through users participation (Kot, Douglas and Ruggeri, Deni: Westport Case Study)
    • A democratic design process is important to define priorities for the community and which guide the community future's actions.
  • Concept 3: Iterative process and residents' daily interaction (Kot, Douglas and Ruggeri, Deni: Westport Case Study)
    • Through an iterative process and various degrees of users' involvement and intensity it's possible to refine the design and adjust the changing needs; in that way it's possible to obtain lasting results and a stronger sense of ownership.

Step 5: Reflection

According to our readings, landscape is a complex construct, made of physical, social and economic factors. The landscape perception is related with the landscape identity: symbols, mythologies, movies and social conventions which influences the way that we perceive the environment and the way we act in it. For that reason, the perception of landscape is different in every country and within every population. But there’s a common truth about landscape: it belongs to people and only they have power on it. Citizen participations and democratic design processes, through an iterative process and various degrees of users’ involvement and intensity, are the way to increase a common sense of ownership of the landscape. Understanding the landscape, the citizens, their needs is an important step before planning or designing. It’s important to define priorities for the community through democratic methods, community is understood as all the people living in a certain landscape, including the “have-not” citizens which are presently excluded from the political and economic process, through the redistribution of power.

Step 6: Revised manifestoes

  • please look again at your initial manifestoes and update them with any new aspects/prespectives you have taken up during this seminar

Assignment 2 - Your Landscape Symbols

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

Landscape Symbols Author 1: Amirhossein Mashayekhifard

Landscape Symbols Author 2- Memory Landscape

Landscape Symbols Auther 3: Reem Hamdan

Landscape Symbols Author 4 - Martina Anelli

Landscape Symbols Author 5 - Caroline Fischer

Assignment 3 - Role Play on Landscape Democracy "movers and shakers"

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

Assignment 4 - Your Landscape Democracy Challenge

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Each group member will specify a landscape democracy challenge in his/her environment

Landscape Democracy Challenge 1: Amirhossein Mashayekhifard

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 2: Reem Hamdan

Your references:

Landscape Democracy Challenge 3: Martina Anelli

Your references:

Landscape Democracy Challenge 4

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 5

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Assignment 5 - Your Democratic Change Process

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • After documenting and reflecting on your challenges you will continue jointly with one of these challenges and design a democratic change process

Your Democratic Change Process

Reflection

  • Our chosen challenge in Bologna city, to make it a cycle-friendly city, required an understanding of what levels of variable powers did the local citizens, university students, cyclists, landscape planners, urban planners, car commuters, traffic planning industries and electricity industries have? And to what extent did each group collaborate with the other. From our theory findings, we understood that many factors affect the way we perceive landscape and for that reason, the perception of landscape is different in every country and within every population. We were able to understand these differences from our different backgrounds, and we all concluded that priority should be given to the community and that power should be redistributed in all cases. Maybe citizens cannot have full control, there is no such ultimate power given to the people, some presidents do not have it, but citizens’ needs should be met. Their needs are an important step before planning and designing and this is the case of Bologna, local citizens cyclists’ needs were not met. Their paths were interrupted because the priority was given to other more powerful groups, which in return caused a disruption in the community. When the community is disrupted, the sense of ownership to the landscape is also in return disrupted. It is also frustrating to the ‘have-nots’ to participate knowing that the power was never redistributed.

Conclusion: - Citizen participation and democratic design processes, through an iterative process and various degrees of users’ involvement and intensity, are the way to increase a common sense of ownership of the landscape. - Citizens should be educated about their rights to landscape to comprehend their needs for a better planning process. - In our change process, we wanted to include methods for a better communication between the citizens and the powers. From workshops to awareness campaigns to school education, we want the citizens in need to have a powerful statement.

Your references