LED2LEAP 2020 - Nuertingen Team 2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
>>>back to working groups overview
| Area | Klein Tischardt | |
| Place | Nürtingen | |
| Country | Germany | |
| Topics | Interaction, Integration, Community, | |
| Author(s) | Alexander Koslov, David Jones, Steve Oberst, Timon Schröder | |
| ||
Landscape Democracy Rationale
- Everything with a decent age needs a renewal from time to time. But to fulfill this development correclty, we need everybody to pull on the string of everybodys needs in public spaces. So in the beginning it's very important to understand the surroundings. How is the age of the population? How many locals and foreigners are living there? Which oppurtunities for interaction are given? In which way dooes the population sees their landscape? The challenge will be to try to involve every citizen and their oppinion. Obviously not everyone will get pleased with the result, but at the end the goal should be to reflect what the general mood and ideas the inhabitants have and how they could be realized.
Location and scope
- Location : Germany, Nürtingen 72622, Klein Tischardt
Phase A: Mapping your Community
Welcome to your community and its landscape
- The Klein Tischardt district is located in Nürtingen, a small town in southern Germany. It borders on the old town and has a village character. The many small shops, which often only consist of garages, are striking. On the edge there is a commercial area with a shopping center. In the center there is an old people's home with assisted living.
community
dependence
Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community
- There are two large groups that are located in the district. The first are small businesses that are spread throughout the district and the second are senior citizens who live in and around the nursing home. The first group has a service relationship with all residents and is accordingly also clearly visible. The second group, however, is more in one place and rarely leaves it. Another group are the young people, who are also rarely seen, because the neighborhood has few cool meeting places. So far we can only guess how everyday life in the neighborhood really works and which groups interact with each other.
pensioners & foreigners
youth & alternatives
Relationships between your actors and groups
- The group of small businesses has the most influence because they own land and are visible. In addition, the residents are dependent on the services of these e.g. Shopping center. We think that all groups have the following interests in common: a good infrastructure, public lounges in nature and shopping.
relations & needs
solution
Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22
- We learned the definition of a wicked problem and how to indicate it. Furthermore how to handle it e.g. figuring out solutions and working on them.
- One of the highest benefits we took from the first presentation were to see other visualisation types/styles. Because of them we leaned how to present our results in a more sketchy and abstract way.
- The presentation was pretty minimalistic without much design and more informative graphs compared to other presentation. And even then the feedback was that it was quite easy to follow and to understand.
Theory reflection
- We like the idea of interacting and analyzing the social components of the community, rather than just looking at their enviroment. We were intrigned by the "people entred landscape concept" and that the landscape is rather constructed in the mind of the people, than it is esthetic assembled place of physical objects. On the other hand we thought, that all the theories about the communities and the landscape democracy are a bit too far away from the actual planning and are sometimes not even controllable.
References
- -
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
The Scene in your Story of Analysis
- The challenge of the project is to involve every commmunity with their needs and desires. The landscape has a rural and the atmosphere of the distict has an oldschool touch. The most noticeble things missing are recreation spaces. There are many stackeholders in the disctrict with the same political power/influence. Only the local shops have a little bit more power because of the dependence of supplys.
scenery in Klein Tischardt
The Actors in your Story of Analysis
- Our analysis is based on a roleplay exercise. For this experiment everyone in our group put himself in a certain character which is represented in the district.
- 1. Slava (19) the typical car advocate -> has the need of more parking lots
- 2. Angelika (52) mother of 2 children -> is worried that her children havent a safe space to play in the disctrict
- 3. Melissa (14) typical teeny girl -> is missing some cool places to hang out with her friends
- 4. Soren (32) the young investor -> wants to invest in the development of the district
- 5. Victor (72) grumpy pensioneer -> lived his whole life in KT and is still missing action
- Everyone besides Soren is a minor Character, because only he has the capital and the political power to change something directly.
characters of the roleplay
The Story of Analysis
- In the following images you can see our story and how the different characters react to the actual situation and to our ideas to develope the disctrict
needs of characters
urban gardening at gerberplatz
opinions of characters to changes
Reflect on your Story of Analysis
- What did you carry?:
- First of all we analyzed the community about its major social groups. Then each member of our team slipped into two or three roleplay characters of the largest community groups. Then we combined our results of the needs, wishes and problems of each of our characters.
- Why did you carry?:
- Due to the Covid-19 crisis we weren't able to ask the citizens personally, but we also wanted to get an insight view of the disctrict from their perspective. That's why we invented representive characters and walked through the quarter from their point of view.
- How did you carry?:
- By introducing around 12 characters we intended a huge variety of results and afterwards combined certain aspects in five key charts.
- What remains after you left?:
- We figured out how to approach tis method of analysis and were positivly surprised by the effect of this analysis method on our creative planning process
statistic chart
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
The Scene in your Story of Visioning
- As we dug further into our analysis we discovered that neither of our characters is well served with the current situation of KT. We had to improve the situation for all of the local stakeholders, not just a particular group and we discovered a lot of wasted potential in the district
KT's hostile surroundings
But with HUGE potential
The Actors in your Story of Visioning
- We chose the six most representive characters of our story of analysis as the actors in our story of visioning
The protagonists of our fictive story
The Story of Visioning
- We see the whole story as an interaction between ourselfes and Klein Tischardt.
- It's fascinating what kind of discussions we hold, while having several different perspectives from the characters we've played.
- And through that we formed our vision and strategy for the district.
Transforming KT from a drive through to a drive in
Our vision
Our strategy
Reflect on your Story of Visioning
reflection
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
Your Prototyping Action
- What was your prototyping action? What does it represent and how does it relate to your vision from Phase C?
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase prototypes1.jpg
add a caption
The Evolution of Your Prototyping Action
- Describe the actors who were working together on this action. What was your collaborative design process? What tools or methods did you use to collaborate?
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase prototypes1.jpg
add a caption
The Plan Behind Your Prototyping Action
- What resources, material and human, did you need to realize your action, and how were they used? What roles were created for this action? Additionally, What kind of timeframe was created for executing the plan?
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase prototypes1.jpg
add a caption
The Realization of Your Prototyping Action
- What happened, who was there and what was the atmosphere like among the participants?
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase prototypes1.jpg
add a caption
Reflect on Your Prototyping Action
- In the end, what change did the intervention create? How would you adjust it to be more effective if you did it again? Consider what it means to be successful, what indicators would you use to measure success in this endeavor? Most importantly, how did your intervention reflect the material in the Phase D lectures?
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase prototypes1.jpg
add a caption
Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming
Process Reflection
- Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
- Which limitations were you facing?
- What have you learnt from each other?
- What would you do differently next time?
- You can also use diagrams/visuals
- 250 words text