LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 9

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

>>>back to working groups overview

Area The Olympic rowing regatta course
Place Oberschleißheim, Munich
Country Germany
Topics Landscape Democracy
Author(s) Naida Kiso, Feryal Halimi, Oluwapelumi Adesoye, Simanta Dash
LED2LEAP DUMMY.JPG

Landscape Democracy Rationale

  • From a landscape democracy perspective, this community context is relevant because it's about a group of people coming together in the same place, to use beautiful landscape for the same interest and that interest is engaging in all kinds of sports and leisure activities. This community uses the same area of land to fulfill their human rights for engaging in sports activities.This is where we see the bridging of landscape and human rights which represent landscape democracy.
  • This way of use of land is very beneficial for wellness and human health which also helps this landscape area to keep its sports spirit and character.

Location and scope

  • You can edit this map with the map editor
  • Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community
Loading map...

Phase A: Mapping your Community

Welcome to your community and its landscape

  • The Olympic rowing regatta course is located six kilometres north of the Olympic Park, half on Munich soil, half on Oberschleißheim soil, in the Dachauer Moos and covers an area of 850,000 square metres.
  • Historical place
  • The Olympic Games competition venue
  • It represents a piece of post-war heritage
  • The facility needs renovation

Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community

  • Main Actor groups: Olympic Park, Authority, Clubs/stakeholders, Athletes
  • Sub-actor groups: Employee, Visitors, Recreationists
  • More Visible groups: athletes
  • Less visible groups: visitors
  • Do to this Corona situation, we don’t know opinions of local people and all our work is based on assumptions and research through internet.


Relationships between your actors and groups

  • How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
  • Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like

Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22

On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:

  • Other analytical approaches
  • Other representation styles
  • Other value schemes: any surprises?
  • Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Theory reflection

  • *The landscape has the relationship between people and governments that the Aarhus convention is based of
  • Difficult to find real inner stakeholders in this area*
  • Hard to find the community groups through internet since the survey wasn’t taken by community membrs
  • Links environmental rights and human rights
  • Acknowledges that we owe an obligation to future generations
  • Establishes that sustainable development can be achieved only through the involvement of all stakeholders
  • Links government accountability and environmental protection
  • Focuses on interactions between the public and public authorities in a democratic context.

References

  • give a full list of the references you have used for this section

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

* template coming

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

* template coming

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming

Process Reflection

  • Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
  • Which limitations were you facing?
  • What have you learnt from each other?
  • What would you do differently next time?
  • You can also use diagrams/visuals
  • 250 words text