LED2LEAP 2020 - Nuertingen Team 7
>>>back to working groups overview
| Area | Klein-Tischardt | |
| Place | Nürtingen | |
| Country | Germany | |
| Topics | integration, interaction, sustainable environment | |
| Author(s) | Luisa Meyer-Böwing | |
| ||
Landscape Democracy Rationale
With the aim of successfully improving a district, we are confronting keywords. Those are innovation, sustainability and inclusion.
- Innovation means renewal: What are the offers? What is old and needs to be restored? What is missing? What does the district need?
- Sustainability means consideration for our natural resources: What ecosystems are in the described landscape? What does traffic mean for the district?
- Inclusion means that everyone belongs to the community: Which people live in the neighborhood? Who uses the district as a commuter, buyer or tourist? What are the social offers?
The task is to evaluate which of these keywords already exist in an existing district, wether they need to be improved or how you can reintegrate them into the district. A quarter improvement should be done with the residents, but it is important to listen not only to the stronger voices, but to all. In order to create a new sense of community from the very beginning, which continues until the renovations have been completed and every following generation.
Location and scope
- Location : Germany, Nürtingen 72622, Klein Tischardt
Phase A: Mapping your Community
Welcome to your community and its landscape
Kein-Tischardt is located directly below the historic centre of Nürtingen, between the rivers Neckar and Steinach and the Stuttgart - Tübingen railway line. There is affordable housing, various retailers and restaurants. The lack of public spaces and interaction problems between the residents are the shortcomings.
Klein Tischardt, a district of Nürtingen is located in the south of germany, below Stuttgart.
The local stakeholders like retailers and restaurants are roughly distributed throughout Klein-Tischardt.
Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community
There are a variation of actors, including the city of Nürtingen with different institutions. In addition, restaurants, clubs and retailers are distributed throughout the district. All these stakeholders lack a meeting and communication area, which makes a clear infrastructure unreadable.
Stakeholder chart of Klein-Tischardt.
Needs and aspirations of the actors and their current visibilty in the community of Klein-Tischardt.
Relationships between your actors and groups
The groups are represented to be evenly important for the growth of the district. But the main players for in the district are the city of Nürtingen and the residents of Klein-Tischardt itself. Above all, there is the administration of the district, which is under the control of the city. As a result, all proposals are handled through the city counsil. The city tries to take into account all actors and sub-communities, but their wishes are only at one of the latter. What is important to all involved in Klein-Tischardt is the upgrading of the infrastructure and free space design.
The chart to show the power between the groups shows that every main group should have an even say in everything. But as of now that is not the case.
The chart for current interest and future goal in the districts problem management.
Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22
On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
- That i should read myself on various alaytical processes in order to achieve a broad result. With different media and specific questions (Who might we?).
- I should better tune my content and presentation for better clarity. It is known to me that i know my district the best, but i have to be able to transmit my knowledge to others too.
- Other value schemes: any surprises?
- Constructive comments we received on our presentation
Theory reflection
The three sessions about 'Democratic Landscape Transformation' were very informativ, in the beginning to learn that there is no definitive formulation to landscape democracy or that there can be more than one possible solution can be quite helpful in finding motives to transform a landscape in a democratic principle. Also to understand the backstories of landscape and communities, with the understanding of the word democracy on its own has given me a new perspective in uncovering informations.
- Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
- From the LED2LEAP Session 1: wicked landscape democracy (Rittel, H.W.,& Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy science) The posibility to evaluation different problems with these 7 descriptions, like with the corona pandemic.
- Scope: 250 words
References
- https://www.nuertingen.de/de/nuertingen-fuer-alle/rathaus-buergerservice/staedtische-aemter-einrichtungen/in-der-uebersicht
- https://www.nuertingen.de/de/nuertingen-fuer-alle/kultur-sport-freizeit/vereine/vereine
- individual information, given to us by the university for our design project in Klein-Tischardt
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
The Scene in your Story of Analysis
- Describe your landscape democracy challenge. What is the physical scene, specific description of the landscape? What are the socio-economic and political characteristics of place? Are there any important contextual elements?
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase scene1.jpg
add a caption
The Actors in your Story of Analysis
- Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
add a caption
The Story of Analysis
- Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- add as many additional images as you like
add a caption
- Yourcase story2.jpg
add a caption
add a caption
Reflect on your Story of Analysis
- How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase refelction1.jpg
add a caption
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
* template coming
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming
Process Reflection
- Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
- Which limitations were you facing?
- What have you learnt from each other?
- What would you do differently next time?
- You can also use diagrams/visuals
- 250 words text