LED2LEAP 2020 - Nuertingen Team 7
>>>back to working groups overview
| Area | Klein-Tischardt | |
| Place | Nürtingen | |
| Country | Germany | |
| Topics | integration, interaction, sustainable environment | |
| Author(s) | Luisa Meyer-Böwing | |
| ||
Landscape Democracy Rationale
With the aim of successfully improving a district, we are confronting keywords. Those are innovation, sustainability and inclusion.
- Innovation means renewal: What are the offers? What is old and needs to be restored? What is missing? What does the district need?
- Sustainability means consideration for our natural resources: What ecosystems are in the described landscape? What does traffic mean for the district?
- Inclusion means that everyone belongs to the community: Which people live in the neighborhood? Who uses the district as a commuter, buyer or tourist? What are the social offers?
The task is to evaluate which of these keywords already exist in an existing district, wether they need to be improved or how you can reintegrate them into the district. A quarter improvement should be done with the residents, but it is important to listen not only to the stronger voices, but to all. In order to create a new sense of community from the very beginning, which continues until the renovations have been completed and every following generation.
Location and scope
- Location : Germany, Nürtingen 72622, Klein Tischardt]]
Phase A: Mapping your Community
Welcome to your community and its landscape
- Briefly introduce us to your community by presenting its location, spatial characteristics, socio-economic characteristics and any known issues/challenges(max 200 signs)
Kein-Tischardt is located directly below the historic centre of Nürtingen, between the rivers Neckar and Steinach and the Stuttgart - Tübingen railway line. There is affordable housing, various retailers and restaurants. The lack of public spaces and interaction problems between the residents are the shortcomings.
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery, you can add more if you like, these can be based on your PPT presentation
- Yourcase communityintro 1.jpg
add a caption
- Yourcase communityintro 2.jpg
add a caption
Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community
- Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)
There are a variation of actors, including the city of Nürtingen with different institutions. In addition, restaurants, clubs and retailers are distributed throughout the district. All these stakeholders lack a meeting and communication area, which makes a clear infrastructure unreadable. So far, the actors who stand out can't be named.
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
- Yourcase actorgroups1.jpg
add a caption
- Yourcase actorgroups2.jpg
add a caption
Relationships between your actors and groups
- How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
- Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
- Your actor relationships 1.jpg
add a caption
- Your actor relationships 2.jpg
add a caption
Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22
On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
- Other analytical approaches
- Other representation styles
- Other value schemes: any surprises?
- Constructive comments we received on our presentation
Theory reflection
- Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
- You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
- Scope: 250 words
References
- give a full list of the references you have used for this section
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
* template coming
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
* template coming
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming
Process Reflection
- Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
- Which limitations were you facing?
- What have you learnt from each other?
- What would you do differently next time?
- You can also use diagrams/visuals
- 250 words text