LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

>>>back to working groups overview

Area Bayern
Place Freising & Munich Airport area
Country Germany
Topics Landscape democracy
Author(s) Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici
Freising.jpg

Landscape Democracy Rationale

  • Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?
  • Format: 3-4 sentences

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape. The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice in it that they will stay active in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can as well.

Location and scope

  • You can edit this map with the map editor
  • Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community


Loading map...

Phase A: Mapping your Community

Freising community

Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

Characteristics

  • plain, with hills in the north
  • the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
  • mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
  • Munich international airport

Socio-economical

  • Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
  • Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
  • Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
  • Many investors and developers

In the past decades the district changed massively: The formerly rather rural area developed to a much sought-after business location with one of the lowest unemployment rates in Germany. Far more than 4,000 enterprises offer jobs to about 66,000 employees liable to contribute to social security. This is a clear indication for it that the medium-sized companies are the most important group of employers. The service providers are on top of the value creation chain. Three fourth of the economic performance are generated in trade, traffic and services, and only one percent is generated in agriculture. and the largest hop-growing area of the world Hallertau. The public hand correspondingly primarily invests in schools, facilities for children and elderly people as well as in the development of the public local traffic and streets.

  • Munich Airport

    Munich Airport

  • Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview

    Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview

Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community

  • Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)
  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
  • Actors'

    Actors'

  • Needs & Aspirations'

    Needs & Aspirations'

The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

Relationships between your actors and groups

  • How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
  • Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
  • Actor interactions

    Actor interactions

Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22

On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:

  • Other analytical approaches
  • Other representation styles
  • Other value schemes: any surprises?
  • Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Theory reflection

  • Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
  • You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
  • Scope: 250 words

References

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

* template coming

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

* template coming

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming

Process Reflection

  • Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
  • Which limitations were you facing?
  • What have you learnt from each other?
  • What would you do differently next time?
  • You can also use diagrams/visuals
  • 250 words text
Retrieved from "https://ledwiki.hfwu.de/index.php?title=LED2LEAP_2020_-_Freising_Team_7&oldid=11333"