LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 5

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

>>>back to working groups overview

Area Freising
Place Freising and Munich Airport area
Country Germany
Topics Landscape Democracy
Author(s) Aida Kadic,Krishna Ambali Parambil,Imad Eddine Lallouche and Zareen Kashfee Prianka
Freising 06.JPG

Landscape Democracy Rationale

  • Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?
  • Format: 3-4 sentences

Location and scope

Loading map...

Phase A: Mapping your Community

  1. The cityscape of Freising is shaped by the location of the city on the tertiary edge of the hill, to the south is Munich Gravel Plain, and extends north to the Tertiary hill country.

The following striking elements shape the cityscape:

  • The Domberg and the Weihenstephaner Berewry

The green slopes

  • The rivers
  • Munich airport.
  • The old town and the historic city and Town centers
  • Neustift, Weihenstephan or Vötting
  • the prince-bishop's residence
  1. A moderately growing population.
  2. Lower rate of unemployment and a thriving prospect.
  3. Multi-sources of income for the landkreis of freising.
  4. Breathtaking forests.
  5. Rich culture and diverse ethnicity.
  6. a beacon for scientists and future brewers.
  7. Reminiscent city with many historical landmarks
  • Caption1

    Caption1

  • Caption2

    Caption2

.

Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community

  • Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)
  1. Primary external stakeholders(Government bodies, moderators and decision makers)
  2. Private external stakeholders(Banks, Hotels, Private health institutions....)
  3. Community local stakeholders(landlords, farmers, investors,scientists......)
  4. Non profit internal stakeholders( churches, sports teams, parents groups....)
  5. Individuals(children, parents, disabled people....)
  • the list of the Groups that are more visible includes( Officials, politicians, farmers, scientists,environment department representatives)
  • Groups that are visible ( Investors,landlords, university, manufacturing organizations..)
  • the remaining groups are less visible
  • the needs and aspirations of the community: sustainable green city, reducing pollution and traffic jam, global warming issue and reducing co2 emission, airport noise, against the 3rd runway project of the airport.
  • The strategies that has already been adopted to counteract wicked problems and the district's regulations.
  • We also need to interact directly with people in order to have an in-depth understanding of the community
  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
  • Yourcase actorgroups1.jpg

    add a caption

  • Yourcase actorgroups2.jpg

    add a caption

Relationships between your actors and groups

  • How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
  • Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
  • The council and the committees including the district administrative officer are the decision makers.
  • the decision makers are elected by citizens.
  • All community members have shared interests, skills and common challenges.
  • Government officials and airport representatives have a common vision.
  • Community members have a conflicting interests with local officials.
  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
  • Your actor relationships 1.jpg

    add a caption

  • Your actor relationships 2.jpg

    add a caption

Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22

On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:

  • Different approaches about storytelling
  • Some groups had a smaller scale focus areas but more detailed analysis.
  • We loved the presentation styles from the other groups and we got inspired with new ideas.
  • Other value schemes: any surprises?
  • We had a lot of information so the comment was to highlight the most important points.

Theory reflection

  • Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
  • You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
  • Scope: 250 words

References

  • give a full list of the references you have used for this section

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

* template coming

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

* template coming

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming

Process Reflection

  • Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
  • Which limitations were you facing?
  • What have you learnt from each other?
  • What would you do differently next time?
  • You can also use diagrams/visuals
  • 250 words text
Retrieved from "https://ledwiki.hfwu.de/index.php?title=LED2LEAP_2020_-_Freising_Team_5&oldid=11061"