LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 5

>>>back to working groups overview

Area	Freising
Place	Freising and Munich Airport area
Country	Germany
Topics	Landscape Democracy
Author(s)	Please enter your name(s)- optional

Landscape Democracy Rationale

• Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?
• Format: 3-4 sentences

Location and scope

• You can edit this map with the map editor
• Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community

Loading map...

{"minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"mappingservice":"leaflet","width":"auto","height":"350px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"zoom":false,"defzoom":14,"layers":["OpenStreetMap"],"image layers":[],"overlays":[],"resizable":false,"fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":true,"cluster":false,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clustermaxradius":80,"clusterspiderfy":true,"geojson":"","clicktarget":"","imageLayers":[],"locations":[{"text":"\u003Cb\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003EMangalia\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E\u003C/b\u003E\u003Cdiv class=\"mw-parser-output\"\u003E\u003Cp\u003ELocation of our Intensive Study Programme\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003C/div\u003E","title":"Mangalia\n","link":"","lat":43.81086294342921,"lon":28.58658163676057,"icon":""}],"imageoverlays":null}

Phase A: Mapping your Community

Welcome to your community and its landscape

• Briefly introduce us to your community by presenting its location, spatial characteristics, socio-economic characteristics and any known issues/challenges(max 200 signs)
• add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery, you can add more if you like, these can be based on your PPT presentation

• Yourcase communityintro 1.jpg

  add a caption

• Yourcase communityintro 2.jpg

  add a caption

Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community

• Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)
• add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like

• Yourcase actorgroups1.jpg

  add a caption

• Yourcase actorgroups2.jpg

  add a caption

Relationships between your actors and groups

• How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
• Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)

• add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like

• Your actor relationships 1.jpg

  add a caption

• Your actor relationships 2.jpg

  add a caption

Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22

On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:

• Other analytical approaches
• Other representation styles
• Other value schemes: any surprises?
• Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Theory reflection

• Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
• You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
• Scope: 250 words

References

• give a full list of the references you have used for this section

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

* template coming

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

* template coming

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming

Process Reflection

• Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
• Which limitations were you facing?
• What have you learnt from each other?
• What would you do differently next time?
• You can also use diagrams/visuals
• 250 words text

---