LED Online Seminar 2019 - Working Group 3: Difference between revisions

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 86: Line 86:
*'''MENTAL IMAGE:''' The imageability or the appearance of any city does not fully rely on its design, physical condition, workability or special organization. The inhabitants, users or the outsiders make an environmental image of the city in their mind and navigate there by 5 (five) physical characteristics. Those are Paths (way of movement), Edges (Physical or mental boundary to difference with the surrounding’s boundary), Districts (a piece of cake in the whole city to remember the identity), Nodes (Strategic points of connections, activities or transitions) and Landmarks (external points of reference, which dominates the usual city structures). Planners or designers nowadays consider those factors while building or rebuilding a city for the look of the city. -''Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press''
*'''MENTAL IMAGE:''' The imageability or the appearance of any city does not fully rely on its design, physical condition, workability or special organization. The inhabitants, users or the outsiders make an environmental image of the city in their mind and navigate there by 5 (five) physical characteristics. Those are Paths (way of movement), Edges (Physical or mental boundary to difference with the surrounding’s boundary), Districts (a piece of cake in the whole city to remember the identity), Nodes (Strategic points of connections, activities or transitions) and Landmarks (external points of reference, which dominates the usual city structures). Planners or designers nowadays consider those factors while building or rebuilding a city for the look of the city. -''Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press''
*
*
*'''RESILIENCY:''' To achieve the goal of Ecological Democracy in the term of city design, resiliency is the middle factor with enabling and impelling. The present city planners and designers are overlooking the concept of an ecologically sustainable city in means of designing posh, lucrative and technological city. This poor city design is creating “lost community” and nurturing a sense of community is not a prime goal now. But if we really want to make a city, where people can live with social, ecological and communal balance, we have to input the equation of creating ecological democracy in city planning. When a city and its landscape are ready to stand with short term disasters besides of creating a social connection (enabling) and a place of personal feeling (impelling), the city must stand out ahead rather than the so-called “Designed City” - ''Hester, Randolph: Democratic Drawing - Techniques for Participatory Design''
*'''RESILIENCY:''' To achieve the goal of Ecological Democracy in the term of city design, resiliency is the middle factor with enabling and impelling. The present city planners and designers are overlooking the concept of an ecologically sustainable city in means of designing posh, lucrative and technological city. This poor city design is creating “lost community” and nurturing a sense of community is not a prime goal now. But if we really want to make a city, where people can live with social, ecological and communal balance, we have to input the equation of creating ecological democracy in city planning. When a city and its landscape are ready to stand with short term disasters besides of creating a social connection (enabling) and a place of personal feeling (impelling), the city must stand out ahead rather than the so-called “Designed City” - ''Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy''


=== Step 5: Reflection ===
=== Step 5: Reflection ===

Revision as of 20:34, 20 May 2019

--> Back to working group overview

Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!

Assignment 1 - Reading and Synthesizing Core Terminology

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Readings are accessible via the resources page

Step 1: Your Landscape Democracy Manifestoes

Step 2: Define your readings

  • Please add your readings selection for the terminology exercise before April 24:

A: Landscape and Democracy

Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City (Shaurav Paul)

Jackson, John Brinckerhoff (1980): "By way of conclusion. How to study the landscape" (Michael)

Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful? (Melissa)

Sieverts, Thomas (2003): Cities without cities. An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. (Azra)

B: Concepts of Participation

Burckhardt, Lucius (1974): Who plans the planning? in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012) (Azra)

C: Community and Identity

Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy (Shaurav Paul)

Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes (Michael)

Spirn, Anne (2005): Restoring Mill Creek (Melissa)

D: Designing

Hester, Randolph: Democratic Drawing - Techniques for Participatory Design (Shaurav Paul)

Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness (Michael)

Smith, Nicola Dawn(2012): Design Charrette: A Vehicle for Consultation or Collaboration (Melissa)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities (Azra)

E: Communicating a Vision

Steps 3 and 4: Concepts Selection and definition

  • Each group member selects three relevant concepts derived from his/her readings and synthesize them/publish them on the wiki by May 15, 2019
  • Group members reflect within their groups and define their chosen concepts into a shared definition to be posted on the wiki by June 12, 2019.
  • Other group members will be able to comment on the definitions until June 30, 2019
  • Each group will also report on their process to come to a set of shared definitions of key landscape democracy concepts on the wiki documentation until July 12, 2019

Concepts and definitions

Author 1: ...

  • ......
  • .......
  • .......

Author 2: Melissa Zapata

  • DISRUPTION & LANDSCAPE: We all have a preconceived idea of landscape with an artistic palette and a charming place. However, this is a personal concept so, what make us all perceived the beauty in the landscape?. Probably is the use of the landscape itself what make us identy with the place. Is the disruption or interaction with a place what let us identify the "hiden rules" common to all of us
  • SELF-KNOWLEDGE & LANDSCAPE LITERACY :As long as the community is engage to know about their past and their history in terms of landscape, better are the chances for them to face new, efficient and successful planning for their future. Thereby, having the capacity of reading their landscape though the academic partnership, the Mill Creek neighboors, were able to create extraordinary proposals away of the sense of guilt and resignation
  • .......

Author 3: ...

  • ......
  • .......
  • .......

Author 4: Shaurav Paul

  • MENTAL IMAGE: The imageability or the appearance of any city does not fully rely on its design, physical condition, workability or special organization. The inhabitants, users or the outsiders make an environmental image of the city in their mind and navigate there by 5 (five) physical characteristics. Those are Paths (way of movement), Edges (Physical or mental boundary to difference with the surrounding’s boundary), Districts (a piece of cake in the whole city to remember the identity), Nodes (Strategic points of connections, activities or transitions) and Landmarks (external points of reference, which dominates the usual city structures). Planners or designers nowadays consider those factors while building or rebuilding a city for the look of the city. -Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
  • RESILIENCY: To achieve the goal of Ecological Democracy in the term of city design, resiliency is the middle factor with enabling and impelling. The present city planners and designers are overlooking the concept of an ecologically sustainable city in means of designing posh, lucrative and technological city. This poor city design is creating “lost community” and nurturing a sense of community is not a prime goal now. But if we really want to make a city, where people can live with social, ecological and communal balance, we have to input the equation of creating ecological democracy in city planning. When a city and its landscape are ready to stand with short term disasters besides of creating a social connection (enabling) and a place of personal feeling (impelling), the city must stand out ahead rather than the so-called “Designed City” - Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy

Step 5: Reflection

Step 6: Revised manifestoes

  • please look again at your initial manifestoes and update them with any new aspects/prespectives you have taken up during this seminar

Assignment 2 - Your Landscape Symbols

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

Landscape Symbols Author 1: Melissa

Landscape Symbols Author 2: Michael



Landscape Symbols Author 3: Azra Haracic




Landscape Symbols Author 4: Shaurav Paul



Assignment 3 - Role Play on Landscape Democracy "movers and shakers"

  • You can read more details about this assignment here

Assignment 4 - Your Landscape Democracy Challenge

  • You can read more details about this assignment here
  • Each group member will specify a landscape democracy challenge in his/her environment

Landscape Democracy Challenge 1

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 3

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...

Landscape Democracy Challenge 4

Your references:

  • ...
  • ...


Your Democratic Change Process

Reflection

  • ....
  • ....
  • ....

Conclusion:

  • ....
  • ....
  • ....

Your references

  • ...
  • ...
  • ...