LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 4: Difference between revisions

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 92: Line 92:


= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe your landscape democracy challenge. What is the physical scene, specific description of the landscape? What are the socio-economic and political characteristics of place? Are there any important contextual elements?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
 
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_scene1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>
 
== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
 
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_actors1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>
 
== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''
 
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:yourcase_story1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>
 
== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
 
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_refelction1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>


= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =

Revision as of 13:30, 5 May 2020

>>>back to working groups overview

Area please enter the area name here
Place please enter the town/village name
Country please enter the country here
Topics please enter the main coast-related topics here
Author(s) Please enter your name(s)- optional
LED2LEAP DUMMY.JPG

Landscape Democracy Rationale

  • Chosen community now is on the edge of changes, and the process of these changes needs to be stimulated with innovative aprroaches. Landscape democracy makes it possible for every stakeholder to be heard, and that can be achieved with the help of democratic instruments. The inevitability of change conception is applicable to our case, because it reveals the recurrence of landscape story. Now we see the site in period of uncertainty and in need of reorganization. At the same time actors want to concervate the best key assets of landscape, which will be the best solution after renovating and growth of democracy in the community.

Location and scope

  • Location: Olympic rowing regatta course Oberschleißheim, Freising-Dachau region, Bavaria, Germany.]]
  • Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community
Loading map...

Phase A: Mapping your Community

Welcome to your community and its landscape

  • The only regatta course in southern Germany out of 5 all over Germany

Protected landscape area (landschaftsschutzgebiet)

Recreational oasis (naherholungsoase)

The regatta center’s first plans were developed in the late 1960’s. It was built to host the rowing and canoeing events of the 1972 Olympic Games. Oberschleißheim was chosen because of its closeness to Munich, making it an ideal location for post-Olympic usage. It was designed to accommodate 25,000 spectators. The course is 2 kilometers long and 135 meters wide.

  • Below file is the Location of the project in which is in Upper Bavaria state, Germany.

Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community

  • The most visible actors:

Locals, tourists (local explorers of hike, bicycle, ski routes, travellers, foreigners)

Athletes (national, foreign, training, non-professional sportsmen, former athletes, sport associations)

Business owners and retailers (small shops, cafes, other services)

Municipalities, landowners (decide on the future scenarios of the place)

  • The less visible actors:
Churches, banks, hospitals, universities, police.

Visitors want to see this place as a flourishing site, they need to have access to different sport activities, social events, shopping points, want safety and comfort.

Municipalities and landowners want to see Regatta course as a profitable place.

Everybody needs Eco-friendly democratic scenarios of renovation.

  • Below picture shows the relationship between different actors/stakeholders in this project

Relationships between your actors and groups

Visitors of all social groups have many shared interests, mainly recreational.

Governmental and political stakeholders are interested in providing well-being, health and safety, while the most visible actors (direct visitors) wish to accept it.

Athletes and regular visitors can have conflicts on the base of using the same territory simultaneously.

Government and land-owners are interested in Regatta's site being economically sustainable.

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

The Scene in your Story of Analysis

  • Describe your landscape democracy challenge. What is the physical scene, specific description of the landscape? What are the socio-economic and political characteristics of place? Are there any important contextual elements?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

The Actors in your Story of Analysis

  • Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

The Story of Analysis

  • Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
  • add as many additional images as you like

Reflect on your Story of Analysis

  • How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

* template coming

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming

Process Reflection

  • Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
  • Which limitations were you facing?
  • What have you learnt from each other?
  • What would you do differently next time?
  • You can also use diagrams/visuals
  • 250 words text