LED2LEAP 2020 - Nuertingen Team 3: Difference between revisions

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 87: Line 87:


== References ==
== References ==
* traffic space - public space from Stefan Bendiks and Aglaée Degros
* traffic space - public space from Stefan Bendiks and Aglaée Degros Podcast The sooner now auf Spotify
Podcast The sooner now auf Spotify


= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =

Revision as of 20:08, 28 April 2020

>>>back to working groups overview

Area Klein-Tischardt
Place Nürtingen
Country Germany
Topics Strengthening diversity and preserving traditions
Author(s) Leila Hoffmann, Carolin Lenz, Chiara Marquart, Vanessa Thaser
Klein-Tischardt.jpg

Landscape Democracy Rationale

  • Klein-Tischardt is a very mixed district. Different social groups live there in different forms of housing. We see a particularly high need for public open space there. People from different backgrounds and different age groups demand the exchange with other people. For this purpose (open) space must be created. The existing, currently undeveloped building area represents a fragile centre of democracy. In case of doubt, it is here that it can decide whether or not citizens are to be given a say. Moreover, the quarter is crossed by a main traffic axis. This means that more people than just the Klein-Tschardt residents have an interest, whether social or economic, in the design of the quarter.

Location and scope

  • map editor
  • District Klein-Tischardt, 72622 Nürtingen
Loading map...

Phase A: Mapping your Community

Welcome to your community and its landscape

  • district Klein-Tischardt between the rivers Neckar & Steinach
  • main road divides KT in two
  • buildings with rural character
  • unused squares & closeness to the river offers potential
  • agricultural background
  • high diversity
  • high average age

Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community

  • more visible groups: senior citizens,citizen’s initiative, families & children, students, refugees, city initiative
  • less visible groups: rowers club, small businesses, workers, gastronomy, tourists

Relationships between your actors and groups

  • senior citizens play a dominant role in the area
  • refugees are less present and dominant
  • shared interests: attractive open spaces, meeting points, safe road spaces, space for representation, possibility for interaction, leisure activities

Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22

  • the scale of the projects are completely different
  • different approaches to analyse, get to know different methods
  • very in-depth informations about the communities through the analysis
  • highly appealing graphics, which supported the comprehensibility of the presentation

Theory reflection

  • Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
Reflection
  • You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
  • Scope: 250 words


References

  • traffic space - public space from Stefan Bendiks and Aglaée Degros Podcast The sooner now auf Spotify

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

* template coming

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

* template coming

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming

Process Reflection

  • Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
  • Which limitations were you facing?
  • What have you learnt from each other?
  • What would you do differently next time?
  • You can also use diagrams/visuals
  • 250 words text