LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 5: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Undo revision 11036 by Zareen.prianka (talk)) Tag: Undo |
No edit summary |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
= Phase A: Mapping your Community = | = Phase A: Mapping your Community = | ||
# The cityscape of Freising is shaped by the location of the city on the tertiary edge of the hill, to the south is Munich Gravel Plain, and extends north to the Tertiary hill country. | |||
*'' | The following striking elements shape the cityscape: | ||
* | * • '''The Domberg and the Weihenstephaner Ber | ||
'''The green slopes''' | |||
* The rivers | |||
* The old town and the historic city and Town centers | |||
* Neustift, Weihenstephan or Vötting | |||
* the prince-bishop's residence | |||
# A moderately growing population. | |||
# Lower rate of unemployment and a thriving prospect. | |||
# Multi-sources of income for the landkreis of freising. | |||
# Breathtaking forests. | |||
# Rich culture and diverse ethnicity. | |||
# a beacon for scientists and future brewers. | |||
# Reminiscent city with many historical landmarks. | |||
== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community == | == Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community == |
Revision as of 20:55, 25 April 2020
>>>back to working groups overview
Area | Freising | |
Place | Freising and Munich Airport area | |
Country | Germany | |
Topics | Landscape Democracy | |
Author(s) | Aida Kadic,Krishna Ambali Parambil,Imad Eddine Lallouche and Zareen Kashfee Prianka | |
Landscape Democracy Rationale
- Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?
- Format: 3-4 sentences
Location and scope
- You can edit this map with the map editor
Phase A: Mapping your Community
- The cityscape of Freising is shaped by the location of the city on the tertiary edge of the hill, to the south is Munich Gravel Plain, and extends north to the Tertiary hill country.
The following striking elements shape the cityscape:
- • The Domberg and the Weihenstephaner Ber
The green slopes
- The rivers
- The old town and the historic city and Town centers
- Neustift, Weihenstephan or Vötting
- the prince-bishop's residence
- A moderately growing population.
- Lower rate of unemployment and a thriving prospect.
- Multi-sources of income for the landkreis of freising.
- Breathtaking forests.
- Rich culture and diverse ethnicity.
- a beacon for scientists and future brewers.
- Reminiscent city with many historical landmarks.
Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community
- Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
- Yourcase actorgroups1.jpg
add a caption
- Yourcase actorgroups2.jpg
add a caption
Relationships between your actors and groups
- How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
- Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
- Your actor relationships 1.jpg
add a caption
- Your actor relationships 2.jpg
add a caption
Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22
On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
- Other analytical approaches
- Other representation styles
- Other value schemes: any surprises?
- Constructive comments we received on our presentation
Theory reflection
- Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
- You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
- Scope: 250 words
References
- give a full list of the references you have used for this section
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
* template coming
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
* template coming
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming
Process Reflection
- Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
- Which limitations were you facing?
- What have you learnt from each other?
- What would you do differently next time?
- You can also use diagrams/visuals
- 250 words text