LED2LEAP 2020 - Nuertingen Team 7: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
= Landscape Democracy Rationale = | = Landscape Democracy Rationale = | ||
*''Everything with a decent age needs a renewal from time to time. But to fulfill this development correclty, | *''Everything with a decent age needs a renewal from time to time. But to fulfill this development correclty, we need everybody to pull on the string of everybodys needs in public spaces. So in the beginning it's very important to understand the surroundings. How is the age of the population? How many locals and foreigners are living there? Which oppurtunities for interaction are given? In which way dooes the population sees their landscape? The challenge will be to try to involve every citizen and their oppinion. Obviously not everyone will get pleased with the result, but at the end the goal should be to reflect what the general mood and ideas the inhabitants have and how they could be realized.'' | ||
= Location and scope = | = Location and scope = | ||
Revision as of 11:28, 21 April 2020
>>>back to working groups overview
| Area | Klein-Tischardt | |
| Place | Nürtingen | |
| Country | Germany | |
| Topics | integration, interaction, sustainable environment | |
| Author(s) | Alexander Koslov, David Jones, Steve Oberst, Timon Schröder | |
| ||
Landscape Democracy Rationale
- Everything with a decent age needs a renewal from time to time. But to fulfill this development correclty, we need everybody to pull on the string of everybodys needs in public spaces. So in the beginning it's very important to understand the surroundings. How is the age of the population? How many locals and foreigners are living there? Which oppurtunities for interaction are given? In which way dooes the population sees their landscape? The challenge will be to try to involve every citizen and their oppinion. Obviously not everyone will get pleased with the result, but at the end the goal should be to reflect what the general mood and ideas the inhabitants have and how they could be realized.
Location and scope
- Location : Germany, Nürtingen 72622, Klein Tischardt]]
Phase A: Mapping your Community
Welcome to your community and its landscape
- Briefly introduce us to your community by presenting its location, spatial characteristics, socio-economic characteristics and any known issues/challenges(max 200 signs)
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery, you can add more if you like, these can be based on your PPT presentation
- Yourcase communityintro 1.jpg
add a caption
- Yourcase communityintro 2.jpg
add a caption
Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community
- Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
- Yourcase actorgroups1.jpg
add a caption
- Yourcase actorgroups2.jpg
add a caption
Relationships between your actors and groups
- How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
- Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
- Your actor relationships 1.jpg
add a caption
- Your actor relationships 2.jpg
add a caption
Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22
On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
- Other analytical approaches
- Other representation styles
- Other value schemes: any surprises?
- Constructive comments we received on our presentation
Theory reflection
- Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
- You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
- Scope: 250 words
References
- give a full list of the references you have used for this section
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
* template coming
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
* template coming
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming
Process Reflection
- Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
- Which limitations were you facing?
- What have you learnt from each other?
- What would you do differently next time?
- You can also use diagrams/visuals
- 250 words text