LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 4: Difference between revisions
Pegah.raftar (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below'' | *''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below'' | ||
File: | [[File:Jr2016 start 4x jf - Copy.png|200px|thumb|left|Athletes canoeing during competition seasons in Münich.]] | ||
== The Actors in your Story of Analysis == | == The Actors in your Story of Analysis == | ||
Revision as of 20:11, 19 May 2020
>>>back to working groups overview
| Area | please enter the area name here | |
| Place | please enter the town/village name | |
| Country | please enter the country here | |
| Topics | please enter the main coast-related topics here | |
| Author(s) | Please enter your name(s)- optional | |
| ||
Landscape Democracy Rationale
- Chosen community now is on the edge of changes, and the process of these changes needs to be stimulated with innovative aprroaches. Landscape democracy makes it possible for every stakeholder to be heard, and that can be achieved with the help of democratic instruments. The inevitability of change conception is applicable to our case, because it reveals the recurrence of landscape story. Now we see the site in period of uncertainty and in need of reorganization. At the same time actors want to concervate the best key assets of landscape, which will be the best solution after renovating and growth of democracy in the community.
Location and scope
- Location: Olympic rowing regatta course Oberschleißheim, Freising-Dachau region, Bavaria, Germany.]]
- Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community
Phase A: Mapping your Community
Welcome to your community and its landscape
- The only regatta course in southern Germany out of 5 all over Germany
Protected landscape area (landschaftsschutzgebiet)
Recreational oasis (naherholungsoase)
The regatta center’s first plans were developed in the late 1960’s. It was built to host the rowing and canoeing events of the 1972 Olympic Games. Oberschleißheim was chosen because of its closeness to Munich, making it an ideal location for post-Olympic usage. It was designed to accommodate 25,000 spectators. The course is 2 kilometers long and 135 meters wide.
- Below file is the Location of the project in which is in Upper Bavaria state, Germany.
Location
Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community
- The most visible actors:
Locals, tourists (local explorers of hike, bicycle, ski routes, travellers, foreigners)
Athletes (national, foreign, training, non-professional sportsmen, former athletes, sport associations)
Business owners and retailers (small shops, cafes, other services)
Municipalities, landowners (decide on the future scenarios of the place)
- The less visible actors:
Churches, banks, hospitals, universities, police.
Visitors want to see this place as a flourishing site, they need to have access to different sport activities, social events, shopping points, want safety and comfort.
Municipalities and landowners want to see Regatta course as a profitable place.
Everybody needs Eco-friendly democratic scenarios of renovation.
- Below picture shows the relationship between different actors/stakeholders in this project
Actors
Relationships between your actors and groups
Visitors of all social groups have many shared interests, mainly recreational.
Governmental and political stakeholders are interested in providing well-being, health and safety, while the most visible actors (direct visitors) wish to accept it.
Athletes and regular visitors can have conflicts on the base of using the same territory simultaneously.
Government and land-owners are interested in Regatta's site being economically sustainable.
SDG map
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
The Scene in your Story of Analysis
- Olympic Regatta course and surrounding communities. Regatta site is located closely to Munich (within 5 km). Ever since the 1972 olympics the regatta course has been an asset for the surrounding communities. It is a recreational space with the capacity for diverse activities.
The surrounding communities come together to share this space. Families, group of friends, visitors and athletes can be seen regularly in the area. Democratic landscape analysis and asessment: People are making use of the space but there's a lot more potential for the regatta course and the actors involved. It is mainly surrounded by agricultural land. There are picturesque fields, forests, green hedges around regatta. However, regatta complex looks separated from landscape and not available for everyone. A renovation to some areas (bike paths, cafeteria, bathrooms) is well needed, designated areas for the current activities taking place and a new proposal to make this beautiful space grow with the communities.
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
The Actors in your Story of Analysis
- General charachters:
- Workers of the regatta
- Regatta Buro
- Families
- Athletes
- Visitors
- Dogs
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
add a caption
The Story of Analysis
Sofie and Franzishka are two women living in Munich. Franzishka still works, and Sofie is already retired. They like to spend their freetime in active way, and often go for walks or cycling together.
When Franzishka and Sofie decided to cycle out of Munich to the regatta, they checked the location at home. They live in Munich for a long and feel themselves pretty comfortably orientated in the area. But at one point of their journey they got confused because of many similar town buildings. They want to ensure the direction and ask passer-bys, because they don’t have internet and haven’t seen any signs. They ride for a couple of km on the same road together with pedestrians and strain their hearing in order to slow down to let another car pass.
They cycle by beautiful fields with groups of vegetation and enjoy the view, willing to go into the most field. On the way they want sometimes to have a rest, repack their clothes and refresh with water, and they do all this on the roadside. Finally they see the turn and realise that they have reached the destination: many people also turn this way. They dismount from bicycles, because the entrance is so narrow and they need to wait for others to pass. Youngsters willingfully continue their bike riding, but respected ladies prefer to be careful - the slope is too steep for them. Sofie tells Fanny: ‘The entrance from this side is definitely not for wheelchairs’. ‘Ja’.
They restart riding when they are on the Regatta level. Now, when there are no championships, nothing can achieve their interest: the territory is pretty empty with facilities, and the local Beach resort, where they could have delicious cocktails, is closed. They just wanted to see the pictures of their youth again - Franzishka remembers regatta as it used to be 30 years ago, when she first came to cheer up for her husband there. Nowadays some of the outbuildings don’t function and look abandoned.
A lot of people of all ages chill near regatta, so old ladies come to lake - they feel here much more comfortable. They see a couple who play domino on the bench - and go further to look for another one. They really like the place and would like to come here more often, with their grandchildren, and want to feel more connected with the beauty of nature - for having something apart from picnics.
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- add as many additional images as you like
add a caption
- Yourcase story2.jpg
add a caption
add a caption
Reflect on your Story of Analysis
- Tools:
Checklist and mental map (investigation of site, attractive points, minuses, what people like/don’t like and why), how actors behave there, what do they want from this place
- Methods:
Calming and evoking- Children’s exciting neighborhood exploration* We would like to involve kids from the surrounding towns in the study area. Plan cooperative activities that develop the area as well as strengthens links in the community. “These activities help identify local resources and show them in a new light and can even lead to neighborhood improvements”. (la Pena et al., 2017, pp. 115)
Engaging the making- Pallet Furniture. Through a hands-on approach, participants contribute their skills and acquire new ones. This creates Places that are distinctly locally made, expressing unique identities with beauty shared by insiders”. (la Pena et al., 2017, pp. 207)
Co-generating “... community members and various stakeholders generate designs through active collaboration and critical exchange”. (la Pena et al., 2017, pp. 165)
- Refrlection:
We want to create an emotional connection between the actors and the space. Our proposal is to develop activities run by the community for the community. This will not only help develop emotional links to the area but contribute to the social growth within the community. Furthermore, it could help the area evolve alongside the community instead of being “left behind”.
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase refelction1.jpg
add a caption
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
* template coming
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming
Process Reflection
- Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
- Which limitations were you facing?
- What have you learnt from each other?
- What would you do differently next time?
- You can also use diagrams/visuals
- 250 words text