LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 4: Difference between revisions
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
*''General charachters: | *''General charachters: | ||
- Workers of the regatta | - Workers of the regatta | ||
- Regatta Buro | - Regatta Buro | ||
- Families | - Families | ||
- Athletes | - Athletes | ||
- Visitors | - Visitors | ||
- Dogs | - Dogs | ||
'' | '' |
Revision as of 12:09, 19 May 2020
>>>back to working groups overview
Landscape Democracy Rationale
- Chosen community now is on the edge of changes, and the process of these changes needs to be stimulated with innovative aprroaches. Landscape democracy makes it possible for every stakeholder to be heard, and that can be achieved with the help of democratic instruments. The inevitability of change conception is applicable to our case, because it reveals the recurrence of landscape story. Now we see the site in period of uncertainty and in need of reorganization. At the same time actors want to concervate the best key assets of landscape, which will be the best solution after renovating and growth of democracy in the community.
Location and scope
- Location: Olympic rowing regatta course Oberschleißheim, Freising-Dachau region, Bavaria, Germany.]]
- Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community
Phase A: Mapping your Community
Welcome to your community and its landscape
- The only regatta course in southern Germany out of 5 all over Germany
Protected landscape area (landschaftsschutzgebiet)
Recreational oasis (naherholungsoase)
The regatta center’s first plans were developed in the late 1960’s. It was built to host the rowing and canoeing events of the 1972 Olympic Games. Oberschleißheim was chosen because of its closeness to Munich, making it an ideal location for post-Olympic usage. It was designed to accommodate 25,000 spectators. The course is 2 kilometers long and 135 meters wide.
- Below file is the Location of the project in which is in Upper Bavaria state, Germany.
Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community
- The most visible actors:
Locals, tourists (local explorers of hike, bicycle, ski routes, travellers, foreigners)
Athletes (national, foreign, training, non-professional sportsmen, former athletes, sport associations)
Business owners and retailers (small shops, cafes, other services)
Municipalities, landowners (decide on the future scenarios of the place)
- The less visible actors:
Churches, banks, hospitals, universities, police.
Visitors want to see this place as a flourishing site, they need to have access to different sport activities, social events, shopping points, want safety and comfort.
Municipalities and landowners want to see Regatta course as a profitable place.
Everybody needs Eco-friendly democratic scenarios of renovation.
- Below picture shows the relationship between different actors/stakeholders in this project
Relationships between your actors and groups
Visitors of all social groups have many shared interests, mainly recreational.
Governmental and political stakeholders are interested in providing well-being, health and safety, while the most visible actors (direct visitors) wish to accept it.
Athletes and regular visitors can have conflicts on the base of using the same territory simultaneously.
Government and land-owners are interested in Regatta's site being economically sustainable.
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
The Scene in your Story of Analysis
- Olympic Regatta course and surrounding communities. Regatta site is located closely to Munich (within 5 km). Ever since the 1972 olympics the regatta course has been an asset for the surrounding communities. It is a recreational space with the capacity for diverse activities.
The surrounding communities come together to share this space. Families, group of friends, visitors and athletes can be seen regularly in the area. Democratic landscape analysis and asessment: People are making use of the space but there's a lot more potential for the regatta course and the actors involved. It is mainly surrounded by agricultural land. There are picturesque fields, forests, green hedges around regatta. However, regatta complex looks separated from landscape and not available for everyone. A renovation to some areas (bike paths, cafeteria, bathrooms) is well needed, designated areas for the current activities taking place and a new proposal to make this beautiful space grow with the communities.
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase scene1.jpg
add a caption
The Actors in your Story of Analysis
- General charachters:
- Workers of the regatta
- Regatta Buro
- Families
- Athletes
- Visitors
- Dogs
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
The Story of Analysis
- Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- add as many additional images as you like
- Yourcase story2.jpg
add a caption
Reflect on your Story of Analysis
- How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)
- add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
- Yourcase refelction1.jpg
add a caption
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
* template coming
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming
Process Reflection
- Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
- Which limitations were you facing?
- What have you learnt from each other?
- What would you do differently next time?
- You can also use diagrams/visuals
- 250 words text