LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 6: Difference between revisions

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 52: Line 52:
</gallery>
</gallery>


== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
== Groups of actors and stakeholders in our community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''we are showing the actor groups in our area, their visibility and needs''
*''There are strong & weak relationships and shared interests between the actor groups''
*''graphical representations based on our PPT presentation''
*''graphical representations based on our PPT presentation''



Revision as of 18:47, 4 May 2020

>>>back to working groups overview

Area please enter the area name here
Place please enter the town/village name
Country please enter the country here
Topics please enter the main coast-related topics here
Author(s) Please enter your name(s)- optional
LED2LEAP DUMMY.JPG

Landscape Democracy Rationale

  • Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?
  • Format: 3-4 sentences

Location and scope

  • You can edit this map with the map editor
  • Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community
Loading map...

Phase A: Mapping your Community

Slide1.JPG Welcome to our community and its landscape

  • OLYMPIC REGATTA COURSE is a rowing venue situated in Oberschleißheim near München in Germany. It was built for the rowing and canoeing events of the 1972 Summer Olympics, since then the site has been in active use ever since – for the daily training sessions of the home based Watersport Clubs as well as for big national and international events like the German Championship or the World Rowing Championship in 2007.
  • The area is also a popular destination for excursions of hikers, cyclers and inline skaters who can enjoy a day out on the paths around the lake.
  • The regatta course area is part of the two communities München and Oberschleißheim.There is mostly agricultural use and forest around the lake. Also it is part of „blue connection“ between Isar and Amper - as you can see in the sketch.

  • graphical representations based on our PPT presentation

Groups of actors and stakeholders in our community

  • we are showing the actor groups in our area, their visibility and needs
  • There are strong & weak relationships and shared interests between the actor groups
  • graphical representations based on our PPT presentation

Relationships between your actors and groups

  • How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
  • Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
  • graphical representations based on our PPT presentation

Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22

On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:

  • Other analytical approaches
  • Other representation styles
  • Other value schemes: any surprises?
  • Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Theory reflection

  • Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
  • You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
  • Scope: 250 words

References

  • give a full list of the references you have used for this section

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

* template coming

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

* template coming

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming

Process Reflection

  • Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
  • Which limitations were you facing?
  • What have you learnt from each other?
  • What would you do differently next time?
  • You can also use diagrams/visuals
  • 250 words text