LED2LEAP 2020 - Dublin-Iveagh Gardens: Difference between revisions

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 44: Line 44:
Note in outline map: Stephen’s Green - Open, perimeter surround by road, noticeable
Note in outline map: Stephen’s Green - Open, perimeter surround by road, noticeable
Iveagh Gardens – surrounded by buildings, with no view in except for on the hatch street side
Iveagh Gardens – surrounded by buildings, with no view in except for on the hatch street side
Drop of 3m on Hatch St and Earlsfort Terrace, making it more hidden. Spatial Characteristics:
Drop of 3m on Hatch St and Earlsfort Terrace, making it more hidden.  
 
Spatial Characteristics:
Designed by Ninian Nevin – functional, formal layout
Designed by Ninian Nevin – functional, formal layout
Sunken lawn: used as a sports pitch, originally for archery
Sunken lawn: used as a sports pitch, originally for archery

Revision as of 14:57, 24 April 2020

>>>back to working groups overview

Area please enter the area name here
Place please enter the town/village name
Country please enter the country here
Topics please enter the main coast-related topics here
Author(s) Please enter your name(s)- optional
LED2LEAP DUMMY.JPG

Landscape Democracy Rationale

  • Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?
  • Format: 3-4 sentences

Location and scope

  • You can edit this map with the map editor
  • Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community
Loading map...

Phase A: Mapping your Community

Welcome to your community and its landscape

  • Iveagh Gardens, St. Stephen’s Green, D2

Located in the most central part of Dublin. Historic and well known park, however very secluded and well hidden. Note in outline map: Stephen’s Green - Open, perimeter surround by road, noticeable Iveagh Gardens – surrounded by buildings, with no view in except for on the hatch street side Drop of 3m on Hatch St and Earlsfort Terrace, making it more hidden.

Spatial Characteristics: Designed by Ninian Nevin – functional, formal layout Sunken lawn: used as a sports pitch, originally for archery Waterfall feature Two fountains Rock area Rose Garden Yew Maze Sundial Wooded area

Socio-Economic Characteristics

Surrounded by wealth and consumerism, with gentrified suburbs close by. However due to its location so centrally in town, it may be prone to antisocial behaviour and with the homelessness crises there may be people sleeping rough in or around the park. Although the high surveillance of the surrounding areas hotels, businesses, NCH, means it may be safer than most town parks.

Business district: KPMG, Deloitte etc. [global companies] Hotels: The Conrad, The Dean, The Iveagh, The Shelbourne Shopping District Where the city meets the suburbs: Portobello, Leeson street, Ranelagh, Rathmines Gentrified area National Concert Hall

)

  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery, you can add more if you like, these can be based on your PPT presentation

Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community

  • Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)
  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like

Relationships between your actors and groups

  • How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
  • Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like

Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22

On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:

  • Other analytical approaches
  • Other representation styles
  • Other value schemes: any surprises?
  • Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Theory reflection

  • Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
  • You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
  • Scope: 250 words

References

  • give a full list of the references you have used for this section

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

* template coming

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

* template coming

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming

Process Reflection

  • Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
  • Which limitations were you facing?
  • What have you learnt from each other?
  • What would you do differently next time?
  • You can also use diagrams/visuals
  • 250 words text