Assignment 3: Your Landscape Democracy Challenge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Deni.ruggeri (talk | contribs) |
Deni.ruggeri (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Time frame == | == Time frame == | ||
Weeks | Weeks 5 – 25.04.2016 - 19.05.2016 | ||
== Task description == | == Task description == | ||
*Based on your theoretical reflection of the multifaceted relationship between landscape and democracy you are now invited to identify landscape democracy challenges in the everyday environment in a community of your choosing. | *Based on your theoretical reflection of the multifaceted relationship between landscape and democracy you are now invited to identify landscape democracy challenges in the everyday environment in a community of your choosing. | ||
*This can be a recent or planned project that raised public concern at either a local or 'regional' landscape process affected by broader political, socio-cultural, economic or environmental driving force. | *This can be a recent or planned project that raised public concern at either a local or 'regional' landscape process affected by broader political, socio-cultural, economic or environmental driving force. | ||
*The aim of this assignment is not to find a solution, but to act as a researcher to identify, analyze, synthesize and communicate the challenge you have chosen to understand and its cause-effect relationships. later in the course you will be asked to | *The aim of this assignment is not to find a solution, but to act as a researcher to identify, analyze, synthesize and communicate the challenge you have chosen to understand and its cause-effect relationships. later in the course you will be asked to develop strategies and models for change, addressed in [[Assignment_5:_Your_Democratic_Change_Model|assignment 5]]. | ||
== Submission format and presentation == | == Submission format and presentation == | ||
*'''Individual work:''' Wiki template to be completed (graphics, short texts) | *'''Individual work:''' Landscape Challenge Wiki template to be completed (graphics, short texts) by '''12th of May 2016''' | ||
*'''Group work:''' | *'''Group work:'''Reflection on differences and similarities between the cases, prepare group presentation and present findings in plenary on '''19th of May 2016''' | ||
== Evaluation criteria == | == Evaluation criteria == | ||
*Quality of individual documentation, completeness, visual representation of status, risks, cause-effect relationships, timely submission | *Quality of individual documentation, completeness, visual representation of status, risks, cause-effect relationships, timely submission | ||
*Quality and depth of cross-cutting analysis in the group | *Quality and depth of cross-cutting analysis in the group | ||
*Quality of oral presentation (i.e. keeping time limits, clarity, quality of presentation slides) | *Quality of oral presentation (i.e. keeping time limits, clarity, quality of presentation slides) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:10, 23 March 2016
--> Back to Assignments Overview
Time frame
Weeks 5 – 25.04.2016 - 19.05.2016
Task description
- Based on your theoretical reflection of the multifaceted relationship between landscape and democracy you are now invited to identify landscape democracy challenges in the everyday environment in a community of your choosing.
- This can be a recent or planned project that raised public concern at either a local or 'regional' landscape process affected by broader political, socio-cultural, economic or environmental driving force.
- The aim of this assignment is not to find a solution, but to act as a researcher to identify, analyze, synthesize and communicate the challenge you have chosen to understand and its cause-effect relationships. later in the course you will be asked to develop strategies and models for change, addressed in assignment 5.
Submission format and presentation
- Individual work: Landscape Challenge Wiki template to be completed (graphics, short texts) by 12th of May 2016
- Group work:Reflection on differences and similarities between the cases, prepare group presentation and present findings in plenary on 19th of May 2016
Evaluation criteria
- Quality of individual documentation, completeness, visual representation of status, risks, cause-effect relationships, timely submission
- Quality and depth of cross-cutting analysis in the group
- Quality of oral presentation (i.e. keeping time limits, clarity, quality of presentation slides)