LED 2016 Group B Democratic Change Process: Difference between revisions

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


<gallery caption="Power Map" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
<gallery caption="Power Map" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:ourpowermap.JPG|Power Map
File:VeraHassignment51.JPG|Power Map
</gallery>
</gallery>


Line 17: Line 17:


<gallery caption="Change Process" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
<gallery caption="Change Process" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:ourchangeprocess.JPG|Change Process
File:Veraassignment52.JPG|Change Process
</gallery>
</gallery>


== Concluding reflections ==
== Concluding reflections ==
*Reflect on your case and your change model. Potentials? Limitations?
In our landscape challenge we have decided to increase the sense of community in Padma riverbank. In fact we think that the present situation it is the result of a lack of engagement of authorities and locals. The decision’s makers want only their personal profit without the consideration of riverbank as a great resource for the population and the social system. Through workshops, outdoor walkings, common meetings and other type of short term, mid term and long term interventions we want to unveil the community spirit. If there is a strong community probably the government  will be convinced to do something like change its previous plan on riverbank and give to the same community the task to take care of their environment.
*Which practices or practitioners have framed your work, including a brief narrative of the potential gaps you have filled in our knowledge as designers and planners of participation.(approx. 150 words)
We think that the main difficulty it is the necessity to try to modify the politician’s minds and interest. We hope that an hard work in this direction would improve local's state of things.


== References ==
== References ==


[[Category:Democratic Change Process LED 2016]]
[[Category:Democratic Change Process LED 2016]]

Latest revision as of 14:32, 18 June 2016

--> Back to your group page

"No fence on public space"-Riverside Padma


Power Map

Create a visual representation of the stakeholder groups that are involved in your case. Try to cover the following aspects in your representation: Power (high, medium, low) / Support (positive, neutral, negative)/ Influence (high or low)/ Need (strong, medium, weak)+ also map the relationships between the stakeholder/power groups

Change Process

Look at the various methods and tools available and think how they can be applied creatively. Think about the needs of different stakeholder groups - you may need a methodical mix to address them all. Illustrate graphically how these methods/tools might be applied in a short, medium and long-term perspective.

Concluding reflections

In our landscape challenge we have decided to increase the sense of community in Padma riverbank. In fact we think that the present situation it is the result of a lack of engagement of authorities and locals. The decision’s makers want only their personal profit without the consideration of riverbank as a great resource for the population and the social system. Through workshops, outdoor walkings, common meetings and other type of short term, mid term and long term interventions we want to unveil the community spirit. If there is a strong community probably the government will be convinced to do something like change its previous plan on riverbank and give to the same community the task to take care of their environment. We think that the main difficulty it is the necessity to try to modify the politician’s minds and interest. We hope that an hard work in this direction would improve local's state of things.

References