LED 2016 Group D Democratic Change Process: Difference between revisions

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


== Power Map ==
== Power Map ==
''Create a visual representation of the stakeholder groups that are involved in your case. Try to cover the following aspects in your representation: Power (high, medium, low) / Support (positive, neutral, negative)/ Influence (high or low)/ Need (strong, medium, weak)+ also map the relationships between the stakeholder/power groups''


<gallery caption="Power Map" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
<gallery caption="Power Map" widths="600px" heights="300px" perrow="1">
File:ourpowermap.JPG|Power Map
File:Gp D-Landscape Challenge 2.jpg|Power Map
</gallery>
</gallery>



Revision as of 10:05, 15 June 2016

--> Back to your group page

The process of planning can be very complex and can also include a high probability of failures. In any case, planners should, to prevent a breakdown, find a democratic way of designing. Planning should also include the value of local knowledge. This inclusion improves the legitimacy of the process. In any case, forward looking planning increases the chance of obtaining a successful, consensus result. Another important aspect that any planner should be aware of is that good policy making can be very influential. Therefore the art of planning processes lies in finding effective ways for stakeholders to participate. Participation and experience in the landscape planning process can be helpful for learning asis the inclusion of stakeholder contributions to the analytical framework and results


Power Map

Change Process

Look at the various methods and tools available and think how they can be applied creatively. Think about the needs of different stakeholder groups - you may need a methodical mix to address them all. Illustrate graphically how these methods/tools might be applied in a short, medium and long-term perspective.

Concluding reflections

  • Reflect on your case and your change model. Potentials? Limitations?
  • Which practices or practitioners have framed your work, including a brief narrative of the potential gaps you have filled in our knowledge as designers and planners of participation.(approx. 150 words)

References