LED2LEAP 2021 - Nitra Team 1: Difference between revisions
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5"> | <gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5"> | ||
File:Location spatial new.jpg1-01.jpg|''Location of Urban Residential quarters'' | File:Location spatial new.jpg1-01.jpg|''Location of Urban Residential quarters'' | ||
File:Socio | File:Socio.jpg| ''Socio-ekonomic charakteristic'' | ||
File:PlaceholderImage_1.jpg|''Residential quarter CHRENOVÁ (source:shorturl.at/rNOPU)'' | File:PlaceholderImage_1.jpg|''Residential quarter CHRENOVÁ (source:shorturl.at/rNOPU)'' | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Revision as of 15:05, 3 May 2021
>>>back to working groups overview
For help with editing this Wiki page use this link.
For assignments and key readings use this link.
| Area | blank | |
| Place | blank | |
| Country | blank | |
| Topics | blank | |
| Author(s) | blank, blank, blank, blank, blank | |
| ||
Landscape Democracy Rationale
Phase A: Mapping Your Community
Welcome to Your Community and Their Landscape
- Our mapping area & living lab is situated in Nitra which is in western Slovakia at the foot of Zobor mountain in the Nitra River valley and also in the Danubian Lowland. The city is divided into 13 urban districts and Nitra is also one of the oldest cities in Slovakia the polulation is about 78. 000 in the picture we can see the whole city also the 2 choosen residential quarter areas Klokočina- the biggest one, and Chrenová. As I mentioned Nitra lies between lowlands and highlands, mainly arable lands are around the city. The city is divided with the river Nitra-which is also an ecological corridor. In fact Nitra is the greenest Slovak city- there is 140 m2 of urban green space per inhabitant. from the whole are of the city urban green areas takes 2,75 % - which are mainly city parks and forests are about 16,41 % belongs here the landscape protected areas as Ponitrie and Dvorčiansky les.
These residential quarters KLOKOČINA and CHRENOVÁ were built as prefabricated blocks of flats in the 70s and 90s of the 20th century. Inner spaces of the blocks of flats are filled with greenery and some artwork of sculptors and it was supposed to serve as sport and relax areas but this function is degradating.
Socio-economic prosperity is mostly concentrated in the city center of Nitra but there are some spots in residential quarters such as shopping center, restaurants and bars concentrated in few spots and there are also some socio-economic events such as exhibitions in Agrokomplex and Botanical garden, market festival or sport events.
Location of Urban Residential quarters
Socio-ekonomic charakteristic
Residential quarter CHRENOVÁ (source:shorturl.at/rNOPU)
Groups of Actors and Stakeholders in Your Community
- The main social groups living in the settlement are families, seniors, children, students and workers. They include several groups with common interests or background. Smaller but not less important are etnic groups.
- Stakeholders are an integral part of the urban scene and community and have the power to influence urban landscape and therefore also peoples lives.
Actors & groups in Urban Residential quarters
insert text here
Relationships Between Your Actors and Groups
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Summary of Your Learnings from the Transnational Discussion Panel
- insert text here
Theory Reflection
• Editors Shelley Egoz, Karsten Jørgensen, Deni Ruggeri (2018): Defining Landscape Democracy (introductory chapter)
Common characteristics of landscape democracy: citizen participation in decision-making and a bottom-up process. While each situation has to be handled according to specific social and cultural manners, the underlying doctrine must remain social equality. Langhorst argues that various systems of neo-liberal restructuring are threatening democracy. He proposes adopting the concept of ‘assemblage’ and operating in fluid environments with various human and non-human actors that intersect and interact’.
• Wilson, Barbara (2020): Disorientation as a Learning Objective
The main purpose of this article was to point out the existence of white racism against black people, and show how it can impact on planning practice on the example of Friendship Court in Charlottesville, VA.
• LED Team (2019):Landscape Education for Democracy (Chapters 1-3, InBo Special Issue)
- Right to the city – right to landscape
- Participation must become more than just a technique but an ethical stance towards greater ecological democracy in landscape change
- Landscape architects must create new ways to make participation both more effective, meaningful and engaging
- Democratic transformation requires design and planning practitioners to partner with communities - recognize social groups, landscape injustice
• Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy
- Local desicion making and future habitation should be designed from GRASROOT LEVEL through direct participation actions implementing local wisdom, attachement to place, networks of interconnection and ecological thinking
- Local design in context of external forces and ramification
- Direct democracy and applied ecology as a foundation for better cities and sustainable future
• Schneidewind, Uwe et al (2016): Pledge for a Transformative Science - A conceptual framework
Transformative Science as a paradigmatic, institutional and methodological reform program. Also a self-reflexive program for further developing science, by critically questioning and reflecting on its own role in societal transformation processes.
Brief Statements from Readings
References
- insert text here
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
The Scene in Your Story of Analysis
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Actors in Your Story of Analysis
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Story of Analysis
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflect on Your Story of Analysis
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
The Scene in Your Story of Visioning
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Actors in Your Story of Visioning
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Story of Visioning
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflect on Your Story of Visioning
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Evolution of Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Plan Behind Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Realization of Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflect on Your Prototyping Action
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflection on the Online Seminar
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Reflection on the Living Lab Process
- insert text here
insert text here
- Location jpg
insert text here
insert text here
Your Living Lab Code of Conduct
- insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
insert text here
Process Reflection
- insert text here