LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 3: Difference between revisions

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 436: Line 436:
File:Evaluation_process1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:Evaluation_process1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>
</gallery>
The ideas and concepts that we produce in the assignments is perfectly fit for the Living Lab Activities.
The number of participants has increased more in number as the organic food is delivered to all people. Tourists were satisfied and the public gathering spaces are filled with more people and communities around regatta area. The workshop that we introduce has given huge number of ideas and concepts that goes very well. People engage in different activities.
our mission was to improving rural livelihood and sustainable food systems with creating local bazaars and the farmers see a greater change in their lifestyles as they were in before.


== Your Living Lab Code of Conduct ==
== Your Living Lab Code of Conduct ==

Revision as of 14:28, 15 July 2020

>>>back to working groups overview

Area please enter the area name here
Place please enter the town/village name
Country please enter the country here
Topics please enter the main coast-related topics here
Author(s) Please enter your name(s)- optional
LED2LEAP DUMMY.JPG

Landscape Democracy Rationale

  • Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?
  • Format: 3-4 sentences

Here are the sustainable Development Goals in which we can achieve: Sustainable cities and communities, Good health and well-being, Climate action, Decent work and Economic growth, Clean water and sanitation, Industry. innovation and infrustructure

Location and scope

  • You can edit this map with the map editor
  • Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community


Loading map...

Phase A: Mapping your Community

Welcome to your community and its landscape

The target of our map community located in Olympic rowing regatta course and its neighborhoods. socio-economic characteristics: Hotels, Restaurants, retail shops, a small airport, Munich airport. the issues that we are facing include: Lack of some conservation measures There are no public open spaces for community events. There is no land-use strategy for the surrounding land. Lack of strong relationships to apply different strategies (environmental, recreation, cultural, education, tourism, and marketing strategies) in this area. Lack of strength nature protection strategies.


Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community

  • Which groups/sub-communities are there? Farmers, Hotel owners, Real estate developers, Athletes, Student, Businessmen, Government officers.

What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? expansion of the park as a Location with potentials for commercial investments and have a place that all other sport can use. There are nonvisible groups like environmentalists and the natural preservation committee will try to protect the areas. But, because of the power of local government and real estate agencies, these groups don't get enough space to protect the areas. Main challenges: • Protection of monumental • Protection for forests and natural environmental especially Habitat of wild animals, especially bluebirds • Need to renovate for Adapt to the environment while maintaining modern safety regulations • Keep infrastructure More visible group: Athletes and Commercial group, Less visible group: Environmental group and Farmers


Relationships between your actors and groups

  • How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
  • Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?

Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22

On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:

  • Other analytical approaches

We learn the pivotal role of brainstorm of problems with using specific examples to support our ideas

  • Other representation styles

Other representation style used of language, signs and images which stand for or represent things were in their work.

  • Other value schemes: any surprises?

Art representation that had been used of its signs like hand sketch, which stand in for and take the place of something, was considered during presentation.

  • Constructive comments we received on our presentation

We have to attention to ongoing plan or some future planning of development by government and authorities in area of case study which we did not think about it.

Theory reflection

  • Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
  • You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
  • Scope: 250 words

Went well: • Tourist can have positive impact on economy • Create area for international event and global fame • Providing job opportunity for local people • Regional development • People, tourist and government need to work more with each other

Difficult: • Tourist can have negative affect an environmental areas • Using up natural resources • Cultural degradation • Deprive the local population from their natural rights to use these resources

References

  • give a full list of the references you have used for this section

https://www.leistungszentrum-muenchen.de/en/ https://www.openpetition.de/petition/online/munich-oberschleissheim-save-the-regatta

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

The Scene in your Story of Analysis

  • Describe your landscape democracy challenge.

Lack of marketing landscape through sustainable marketing-call for more social, cultural, and traditional responsibility and traffics and attraction. What is the physical scene, a specific description of the landscape? farms and agricultural land near Olympic rowing regatta course What are the socio-economic and political characteristics of place? Are there any important contextual elements? eco-tourism Socio-economic

political characteristics of the place

  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

The Actors in your Story of Analysis

  • Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

Government (stakeholder)

farmers (community)
tourist
local and international funded NGO (stakeholder)

Key relationships community local and international funded NGO Government of free state of Bavaria Munich city council


The Story of Analysis

  • Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below
  • add as many additional images as you like

I want to explain our story in two sections for you: First section is related to current moment Second section is related some happens that lead to current situation in our story. So in the current moment, farmers in Regatta course have already applied to city council for set upping a local bazar where you can find some organic foods such as fruits and fresh vegetables and also traditional arts that are handmade. If their request is approved, funding and land belongs to them and they can set up local market in their region. I go back to the past and explain the concept of this idea. Since Regatta course is a tourism area, a wide range of people especially athletes who are main tourist’s community in this area come there for two months in summer season in order to participate boat competitions. So there was a high volume requests from tourists for organic foods in summer season due to agriculture potentials have this region so that in order to provide them they have to travel to local market in Freising city especially sportsman who organic food due to nutrition values has high level of importance for them. On the other hand, these requests create a motivation for Dani who is the young generation of farmers. He thought about providing organic foods so that tourists do not have to go other cities from this area in order to buy them. In addition, this commute always lead to increase traffic problems in this area especially in summer season. So he start to plant of organic products briefly in a small part of his agriculture land and then he expanded it gradually. So after one year he could make a reality about his idea so that planting and selling organic products has become her main occupation alongside agriculture products. Besides, other farmers followed Dani ideas in their agriculture land so that plant and grow of organic foods have included in agriculture approaches in this area now. Then with regard to this changes Dani thought about organizing a local market in Regatta course where all farmers can present their organic products in this area for tourist’s people who are interested to buy these products in a collection with different diversity. On the other hand, Dani are thinking about present some traditional arts that existed in Regatta course, for example a type of hand made with wood that play an important role in cultural values of this area. An art that has been passed down from generation to generation and can provide some tourist attraction if would be developed in a local market. So, Dani suggested the local bazar idea to farmers community and explained some beneficial of that for them. They became interested in her idea and decided to apply from city council and now they are waiting for the result.

Reflect on your Story of Analysis

  • How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

The existence of local bazaars around Regatta reduces the volume of traffic in the center of Munich, and reduces traffic in these areas. In addition, organizing the bazaars around the city of Regatta creates effective and useful jobs in the society. Local markets around Regatta are mostly for organic agricultural products and fruits and creates Home Jobs. Make an attitudinal change towards the dwellers of the site hat might cause the proper maintaining and further development of the site that can effect both the site and users in a positive way.

Banner, possessions by local community, Addressing to the political leaders and selected local representative of that particular area, Local bazar that held near heritage area (organic product), Cultural heritage, traditional handicraft

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

The Scene in your Story of Visioning

  • Reiterate your landscape democracy challenge, by making a problem statement based on your landscape evaluation and the results of your Phase B assessment. Describe your challenge by digging further into the the physical scene and the community associated with this place.
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

challenge: Lake of Organized marketing landscape through sustainable marketing-call for more social, cultural and traditional responsibility and traffics and attraction.

problem-statement based on the landscape evaluation and assessment: Increase in volume of traffic, No job opportunities for local people, Promoting heritage and cultures from traditional materials, No Gender equality

The Actors in your Story of Visioning

  • Describe the particular characters that are going to participate in the visioning phase. Why were they chosen to participate and where will the visioning phase happen?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

who is involved in the visioning process: Government (stakeholder), farmers (community), tourists, local and international funded NGO (stakeholder)

Key relationships between: community, local and international funded NGO , Government of free state of Bavaria, Munich city council

The Story of Visioning

  • Describe the crux of the story. How did the actors engage in collectively developing the goals, and what was the process involved in prioritizing them? Slide 1
  • What is the visualization, the actual vision, that expresses the synthesis of these prioritized goals? Slide 2
  • What is the strategy that was built for attaining one of these goals, the three year plan of action? Slide 3
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

Slide 1: developed goals together and how we managed to prioritize: Government policy, EU- to develop economic development and issues through community consultation with local farmers so as to produce more agricultural goods and better quality of services, United nations, German NGOs call on government to support agroecology: To change this situation, the organizations call upon their government to make agroecology the central concept in combating hunger and poverty and adapting to climate change and to take it as a basis for the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy of the European Union, Munich city council

Slide 2: Vision: Improving rural livelihood and sustainable food systems with creating local bazaar

Slide 3: Our Mission: To promote agroecolgical principle and rural entrepreneurship

Our values: Respect and value for local knowledge and innovation, Value for the envirnment and ecosystems, Create, flexible and innovative, Sensitive to gender, Quality, equality and ethics

Reflect on your Story of Visioning

  • What points were most important when formulating goals and what are the common characteristics of a good vision?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

Reflection: distinctive, confidence, flexibility, Core values, Inclusive( cover the broadest possible community or context), Compelling( visions must draw people,attract them,it must feel worth achieving), Achievability/feasible ( the vision we have must feel like achievable in a particular time period), inclusive( cover the broadest possible community or context), aligned( vision should fit with the inclinations, needs, trends of the community or users), Create integration with farms and local bazaar

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

Your Prototyping Action

  • What was your prototyping action? What does it represent and how does it relate to your vision from Phase C?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

More economic opportunity which will increase further more Organic fruits and foods will eventually sell to local people. Whole regatta course will be a center stage(focal point) for tourists as it will create more attractiveness and exotic place within the local bazaar areas. We realize that fresh fruits and foods will be supplied and produced to the tourists in a cheap rate.

Improving rural livelihood and sustainable food systems with creating local bazaars and to achieve agrological principle and rural entrepreneurship leading to success. Creating Common Market Organization within the local bazar area.

The Evolution of Your Prototyping Action

  • Describe the actors who were working together on this action. What was your collaborative design process? What tools or methods did you use to collaborate?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

The actors are

Govenment

Farmer

EU

German NGOs

Munich city council

The tools and method we use

Workshops and after workshops(test the ideas that local people come with them)

Reshape the ideas

Informing the public about project and its advantages

Local Council Meeting 

Communication 

Banner, possessions by local community 

Addressing to the political leaders and selected local representative of that particular area

The Plan Behind Your Prototyping Action

  • What resources, material and human, did you need to realize your action, and how were they used? What roles were created for this action? Additionally, What kind of timeframe was created for executing the plan?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

Resources, Materials, and Human need to realize our action

Common Market Organization involving government, farmer, EU, German NGO’s and Munich city council to make a structure

The use of the human resouces and materials

Meeting and addressing to the Munich city council

Roles description

Government- monitoring supplies and all needs for production

Farmer: produce fruits and foods and sell it to the market

EU- monitoring the overall process by communication with government and Munich city council to maintain sustainable food ecosystems.

German NGO’s- to provide materials by their own costs to the farmers.

Munich City Council- maintain land use management and encourage farmers to produce more goods as well as increase production.

Timeframe for executing the plan

4 years of action plan

Communication: 2 years

Meeting: 1 year

Production: 1 year

The Realization of Your Prototyping Action

  • What happened, who was there and what was the atmosphere like among the participants?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

We create a workshop to introduce local people and government to what kind of project we will have in that place. Make a please so they can talk to each other and also talk about their ideas.

Celebrative working strategy with participants

Reflect on Your Prototyping Action

  • In the end, what change did the intervention create? How would you adjust it to be more effective if you did it again? Consider what it means to be successful, what indicators would you use to measure success in this endeavor? Most importantly, how did your intervention reflect the material in the Phase D lectures?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

Intervention can create change in people involved and resources needed.

Actors can get to each other and communicate ideas and theories and after that putting ideas into the actions.

Measuring success

confidence,

inclusive( cover the broadest possible community or context)

achievability( the vision we have must feel like achievable in a particular time period)

Create integration with farms and local bazaar

Reflection

it was successful because we can create space for organizing the intervention event in comfortable atmosphere for all actors with engagement of participants

With the number of people that participate

Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas

Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection

  • Reiterate your landscape democracy challenge, by listing the relevant UN Sustainable Development Goals. How has the your work with he community this far affect your perceptions of theses goals in regards to the LD challenge? How has your team, or community partner, modified these goals over the course of this course?’'
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below


LD Challenge. Covid 2019. 1.SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES, 2.DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH, 3.GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 4.INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE, 5.CLIMATE ACTION


We add new dimensions such as sustainable food marketing which can be shared as one of the sustainable development goals in terms of producing organic foods and sell it to the public.


We are initially starts from the regatta course area as this place has an increased opportunity to develop an interesting access to both the athletes and tourists.

The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation

  • ’'Reintroduce the stakeholders that are going to participate in the visioning phase, what is the existing power structure? How has that structure shifted leading up to evaluation, and how has your understanding of your role shifted?
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below


Right now, the government put emphasis on farmers other than commercial groups to produce organic foods and nutrients to the tourists which is an important balance around the regatta environment. Munich City Council are also involved with the farmers and monitored the phases or steps towards production of foods for greater economic success.


Government-monitoring supplies and all needs for production Farmer: produce fruits and foods and sell it to the market EU-monitoring the overall process by communication with government and Munich city council to maintain sustainable food ecosystems. German NGO’s-to provide materials by their own costs to the farmers. Munich City Council-maintain land use management and encourage farmers to produce more goods as well as increase production   We will involve media such as journalists which might be a powerful approach to address the community through ads and writing in newspaper.

Reflection of the Online Seminar

  • ’'How did the pandemic affect your learning and your team work? Did the theoretical material support your project or did it confuse the process? How well did the assignments and the online challenges reflect on the nature of landscape democracy challenges?’'
  • ’'add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery belowv


We have to look for other method as well which might be suitable for us other than what tool we use. For example, if we develop methods such as online survey can be beneficial to understand people’s opinion and perception.


We didn’t have any site walk as most of our survey and research is based on assumptions.

The meaning of democracy is still unknown and not defined as a whole. All the content and courses has some kind of relation throughout the seminar but the outcome is still unknown as we cannot actually find out what landscape democracy is all about.

Reflection of the Living Lab Process

  • ’'How did COVID-19 affect the living lab and it’s activities. Were you and the community satisfied with them? What were the greatest outcomes, outputs and impacts of the project? What indicators did you use to evaluate them?’'
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below


The ideas and concepts that we produce in the assignments is perfectly fit for the Living Lab Activities.

The number of participants has increased more in number as the organic food is delivered to all people. Tourists were satisfied and the public gathering spaces are filled with more people and communities around regatta area. The workshop that we introduce has given huge number of ideas and concepts that goes very well. People engage in different activities.

our mission was to improving rural livelihood and sustainable food systems with creating local bazaars and the farmers see a greater change in their lifestyles as they were in before.

Your Living Lab Code of Conduct

  • ’’What were the main values driving your lab, and what ground rules were set up as a result of that same reflection?’’
  • add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below

Process Reflection

  • Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study

The number of participants has increased more in number as the organic food is delivered to all people. Tourists were satisfied and the public gathering spaces are filled with more people and communities around regatta area. The workshop that we introduce has given huge number of ideas and concepts that goes very well. People engage in different activities. our mission was to improving rural livelihood and sustainable food systems with creating local bazaars and the farmers see a greater change in their lifestyles as they were in before.

For the overall process to make our objectives successful, we use quantitative indicators. As go through our scenarios of story, we made a workshop which we use it as a tool to verify number of satisfaction among people. We examine number of participants and look out for feedback received from them in that particular workshop areas. We measure the satisfaction level of every participants.


  • Which limitations were you facing?

Unfortunately, We didn’t have any site walk as most of our survey and research is based on assumptions.

  • What have you learnt from each other?

The approach to work within the community. Bring structures and foundations so that we can get minimal development and results. Logical thinking about details. How to find out the target community and work with them. How democracy can change our view in designing landscape. Co-design approach with setting of goals.

  • What would you do differently next time?

Monitoring the action plan and evaluate the result.


  • You can also use diagrams/visuals
  • 250 words text

Government-monitoring supplies and all needs for production Farmer: produce fruits and foods and sell it to the market EU-monitoring the overall process by communication with government and Munich city council to maintain sustainable food ecosystems. German NGO’s-to provide materials by their own costs to the farmers. Munich City Council-maintain land use management and encourage farmers to produce more goods as well as increase production   We will involve media such as journalists which might be a powerful approach to address the community through ads and writing in newspaper.

Right now, the government put emphasis on farmers other than commercial groups to produce organic foods and nutrients to the tourists which is an important balance around the regatta environment. Munich City Council are also involved with the farmers and monitored the phases or steps towards production of foods for greater economic success. We add new dimensions such as sustainable food marketing which can be shared as one of the sustainable development goals in terms of producing organic foods and sell it to the public. We are initially starts from the regatta course area as this place has an increased opportunity to develop an interesting access to both the athletes and tourists.