LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 4: Difference between revisions
Pegah.raftar (talk | contribs) |
Pegah.raftar (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
= Location and scope = | = Location and scope = | ||
*''Location: The park zone around the Olympic rowing regatta course Oberschleißheim]]'' | *''Location: The park zone around the Olympic rowing regatta course Oberschleißheim, Freising-Dachau Region, Upper Bavaria, Germany]]'' | ||
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community'' | *''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community'' | ||
{{#display_map: 43.81086294342921,28.58658163676057~Mangalia~Location of our Intensive Study Programme | {{#display_map: 43.81086294342921,28.58658163676057~Mangalia~Location of our Intensive Study Programme |
Revision as of 19:13, 27 April 2020
>>>back to working groups overview
Landscape Democracy Rationale
- Chosen community now is on the edge of changes, and the process of these changes needs to be stimulated with innovative aprroaches. Landscape democracy makes it possible for every stakeholder to be heard, and that can be achieved with the help of democratic instruments. The inevitability of change conception is applicable to our case, because it reveals the recurrence of landscape story. Now we see the site in period of uncertainty and in need of reorganization. At the same time actors want to concervate the best key assets of landscape, which will be the best solution after renovating and growth of democracy in the community.
- Format: 3-4 sentences
Location and scope
- Location: The park zone around the Olympic rowing regatta course Oberschleißheim, Freising-Dachau Region, Upper Bavaria, Germany]]
- Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community
Phase A: Mapping your Community
Welcome to your community and its landscape
- Location - Metropolitan region of Munich
The only regatta course in southern Germany out of 5 all over Germany
Protected landscape area (landschaftsschutzgebiet)
Recreational oasis (naherholungsoase)
The regatta center’s first plans were developed in the late 1960’s. It was built to host the rowing and canoeing events of the 1972 Olympic Games. Oberschleißheim was chosen because of its closeness to Munich, making it an ideal location for post-Olympic usage. It was designed to accommodate 25,000 spectators. The course is 2 kilometers long and 135 meters wide.
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery, you can add more if you like, these can be based on your PPT presentation
- Yourcase communityintro 1.jpg
add a caption
- Yourcase communityintro 2.jpg
add a caption
Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community
- The most visible actors:
Locals, tourists (local explorers of hike, bicycle, ski routes, travellers, foreigners)
Athletes (national, foreign, training, non-professional sportsmen, former athletes, sport associations)
Business owners and retailers (small shops, cafes, other services)
Municipalities, landowners (decide on the future scenarios of the place)
- The less visible actors:
Churches, banks, hospitals, universities, police.
Visitors want to see this place as a flourisching site, they need to have access to different sport activites, social events, shopping poins, want safety and comfort. Municipalities and landowners want to see Regatta course as a profitable place. Everybody needs eco-friendlu democratic scenarios of renovation.
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
- Yourcase actorgroups1.jpg
add a caption
- Yourcase actorgroups2.jpg
add a caption
Relationships between your actors and groups
- How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
- Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
- add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like
- Your actor relationships 1.jpg
add a caption
- Your actor relationships 2.jpg
add a caption
Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22
On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
- Other analytical approaches
- Other representation styles
- Other value schemes: any surprises?
- Constructive comments we received on our presentation
Theory reflection
- Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
- You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
- Scope: 250 words
References
- give a full list of the references you have used for this section
Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment
* template coming
Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting
* template coming
Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning
* template coming
= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming
Process Reflection
- Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
- Which limitations were you facing?
- What have you learnt from each other?
- What would you do differently next time?
- You can also use diagrams/visuals
- 250 words text