LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 3: Difference between revisions

From Ledwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 39: Line 39:
= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Welcome to your community and its landscape ==
== Welcome to your community and its landscape ==
'''The target of our map community located in Olympic rowing regatta course and its neighborhoods'''
The target of our map community located in Olympic rowing regatta course and its neighborhoods
socio-economic characteristics:Hotels, Restaurants, retail shops, a small airport, Munich airport.
socio-economic characteristics: Hotels, Restaurants, retail shops, a small airport, Munich airport.
the issues that we are facing include:
the issues that we are facing include:
Lack of some conservation measures
Lack of some conservation measures

Revision as of 20:10, 25 April 2020

>>>back to working groups overview

Area please enter the area name here
Place please enter the town/village name
Country please enter the country here
Topics please enter the main coast-related topics here
Author(s) Please enter your name(s)- optional
LED2LEAP DUMMY.JPG

Landscape Democracy Rationale

  • Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?
  • Format: 3-4 sentences

Location and scope

  • You can edit this map with the map editor
  • Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community
Loading map...

Phase A: Mapping your Community

Welcome to your community and its landscape

The target of our map community located in Olympic rowing regatta course and its neighborhoods socio-economic characteristics: Hotels, Restaurants, retail shops, a small airport, Munich airport. the issues that we are facing include: Lack of some conservation measures There are no public open spaces for community events. There is no land-use strategy for the surrounding land. Lack of strong relationships to apply different strategies (environmental, recreation, cultural, education, tourism, and marketing strategies) in this area. Lack of strength nature protection strategies.


Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community

  • Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)
  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like

Relationships between your actors and groups

  • How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?
  • Which groups may have shared interests and which are these? (max 200 signs)
  • add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like

Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22

On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:

  • Other analytical approaches
  • Other representation styles
  • Other value schemes: any surprises?
  • Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Theory reflection

  • Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation
  • You can choose references from our reading list or suggest others
  • Scope: 250 words

References

  • give a full list of the references you have used for this section

Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment

* template coming

Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting

* template coming

Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

* template coming

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas * template coming

Process Reflection

  • Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study
  • Which limitations were you facing?
  • What have you learnt from each other?
  • What would you do differently next time?
  • You can also use diagrams/visuals
  • 250 words text