LED2LEAP 2021 - Zagreb Team 3 - Revision history

Kristina.tomasa: /* Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas */

2021-08-01T09:37:46Z

Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 1 August 2021
Line 380:		Line 380:

	10. Do you think that the existing laws are adequately structured and sufficiently detailed? Do you think that the existing laws need to be reformed? Will you actively participate and propose amendments to the law on the drafting of the BS and penalties for violating traffic rules?		10. Do you think that the existing laws are adequately structured and sufficiently detailed? Do you think that the existing laws need to be reformed? Will you actively participate and propose amendments to the law on the drafting of the BS and penalties for violating traffic rules?

			<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
			File:fd3.jpg\|''Devising 10 questions for authorities''
			</gallery>

	Since we didn't do real public testing, only role play, we decided to question our challenges and project goals through an analysis of previously conducted research and surveys. We studied ''Perceptions toward cycling in Zagreb area: differences concerning age, gender and membership in the association “Trade Union of Cyclists”'', Sindik, Halgota, Kirac, Šarić, Gregović 2013. and ''Arrangement of the part of the intermodal node intended for bicycle traffic and integration of traffic-functional and social content in Sesvete'', Spajić 2014.		Since we didn't do real public testing, only role play, we decided to question our challenges and project goals through an analysis of previously conducted research and surveys. We studied ''Perceptions toward cycling in Zagreb area: differences concerning age, gender and membership in the association “Trade Union of Cyclists”'', Sindik, Halgota, Kirac, Šarić, Gregović 2013. and ''Arrangement of the part of the intermodal node intended for bicycle traffic and integration of traffic-functional and social content in Sesvete'', Spajić 2014.
Line 420:		Line 424:
	'''Conclusion: '''		'''Conclusion: '''
	Given the highlights, it can be concluded that the challenges that were imposed 7-8 years ago have continued to this day and that not much has changed in the city for the better in terms of cycling. Today we certainly have more bike paths than 7-8 years ago, but the problems are still the same, bike paths are non-existent in some parts of the city, while the existing ones are discontinuous and poorly maintained, technically defective, low quality and unsatisfactory. After 8 years, the importance of educating all traffic participants, the need for bicycle traffic (along with public and pedestrian) to become dominant, as well as the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to promote cycling are still to this day being emphasized. All of the above reflects the still insufficient development of the cycling infrastructure in the city of Zagreb. Based on the comparison of our views on problems and solutions and the views of the community, we conclude that our views definitely coincide and that we did not omit any important items for understanding and further solving the problem and continuing the project. In addition to the obvious technical and planning nature, we additionally focused on the social nature, so in addition to educating traffic participants and the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to encourage cycling, we placed great emphasis on active public involvement in the project process, the importance of mutual social interaction and cooperation between different social groups as well as the importance of creating a strong and happy community. In addition, an important focus was the integration of the bike path within a neighborhood level as well as the city level, where we want to see that one day the cities will be networked and connected with the bike paths which will be interconnected with green public and open spaces.		Given the highlights, it can be concluded that the challenges that were imposed 7-8 years ago have continued to this day and that not much has changed in the city for the better in terms of cycling. Today we certainly have more bike paths than 7-8 years ago, but the problems are still the same, bike paths are non-existent in some parts of the city, while the existing ones are discontinuous and poorly maintained, technically defective, low quality and unsatisfactory. After 8 years, the importance of educating all traffic participants, the need for bicycle traffic (along with public and pedestrian) to become dominant, as well as the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to promote cycling are still to this day being emphasized. All of the above reflects the still insufficient development of the cycling infrastructure in the city of Zagreb. Based on the comparison of our views on problems and solutions and the views of the community, we conclude that our views definitely coincide and that we did not omit any important items for understanding and further solving the problem and continuing the project. In addition to the obvious technical and planning nature, we additionally focused on the social nature, so in addition to educating traffic participants and the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to encourage cycling, we placed great emphasis on active public involvement in the project process, the importance of mutual social interaction and cooperation between different social groups as well as the importance of creating a strong and happy community. In addition, an important focus was the integration of the bike path within a neighborhood level as well as the city level, where we want to see that one day the cities will be networked and connected with the bike paths which will be interconnected with green public and open spaces.

			<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
			File:fd1.jpg\|''Studying conducted surveys and questionnaires''
			File:fd2.jpg\|''Comparing conclusions from the performed studies with our own conclusions, visions, problems and goals''
			</gallery>

	== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==		== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==
Line 431:		Line 440:

	'''Local government''' - although they were not directly involved in our process, they are a very important part of this puzzle because they have the power to make decisions and implement our projects. In order for the project to go further, they would certainly get involved and evaluate our project.		'''Local government''' - although they were not directly involved in our process, they are a very important part of this puzzle because they have the power to make decisions and implement our projects. In order for the project to go further, they would certainly get involved and evaluate our project.

			<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
			File:fd4.jpg\|''All actors come together to reach one goal''
			</gallery>

	== Reflection on the Online Seminar ==		== Reflection on the Online Seminar ==
	At the online seminar we gained new knowledge, information, instructions and techniques, which then shaped and changed the way we think and look at our professional world. Through various lectures, presentations, discussions and workshops, we received inputs in an interesting way, which we then had the opportunity to research, analyze and apply. We made some new acquaintances and got a clearer idea of how to listen to the needs of the community, how to understand them and how to involve them in the planning process through an interesting way for them and useful way for us.		At the online seminar we gained new knowledge, information, instructions and techniques, which then shaped and changed the way we think and look at our professional world. Through various lectures, presentations, discussions and workshops, we received inputs in an interesting way, which we then had the opportunity to research, analyze and apply. We made some new acquaintances and got a clearer idea of how to listen to the needs of the community, how to understand them and how to involve them in the planning process through an interesting way for them and useful way for us.

			<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
			File:fd5.jpg\|''Reflection on online seminar''
			</gallery>

	== Your Living Lab Code of Conduct ==		== Your Living Lab Code of Conduct ==
	*insert text here		After the completion of the whole project and with everything we have learned so far, we have come to the conclusion what is in our opinion the cornerstone in this whole process - LISTENING. To listening to the community and their wishes, needs, visions, problems will lead to the point where project will start to unravel itself. It is very important to learn to listen to other people's wishes and needs in contrary what we as experts think is important and to know how to find a balance between the opinions and needs of such a large number of people. The whole community is built with that starting point of listening, where we give someone a chance to tell their story, express their opinions and let them be and feel heard. When someone invests themselves in the project and starts to consider that project as their own then we get what we want: people to take care about that space. A community is strong and happy if they connect, and the best way to achieve this is through social interaction.

	<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">		<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
	File:~~PlaceholderImage_22~~.jpg\|''~~insert text here''~~		File:fd6.jpg\|''With everything we have learned so far, we have come to the final realization - Listen''
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_22.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_22.jpg\|''insert text here~~''
	</gallery>		</gallery>

	== Process Reflection ==		== Process Reflection ==
	This whole process was a great experience that definitely changed our perspective of looking at things and gave us some new filters through which to study the world around us. It was a lot of fun and useful for us and we are happy that we had the opportunity to be a part of it.		This whole process was a great experience that definitely changed our perspective of looking at things and gave us some new filters through which to study the world around us. It was a lot of fun and useful for us and we are happy that we had the opportunity to be a part of it.

Kristina.tomasa: /* The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation */

2021-07-19T15:59:31Z

The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 19 July 2021
Line 431:		Line 431:

	'''Local government''' - although they were not directly involved in our process, they are a very important part of this puzzle because they have the power to make decisions and implement our projects. In order for the project to go further, they would certainly get involved and evaluate our project.		'''Local government''' - although they were not directly involved in our process, they are a very important part of this puzzle because they have the power to make decisions and implement our projects. In order for the project to go further, they would certainly get involved and evaluate our project.


	== Reflection on the Online Seminar ==		== Reflection on the Online Seminar ==

Kristina.tomasa: /* Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas */

2021-07-19T15:01:47Z

Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas

@@ Line 435: / Line 435: @@
 == Reflection on the Online Seminar ==
 At the online seminar we gained new knowledge, information, instructions and techniques, which then shaped and changed the way we think and look at our professional world. Through various lectures, presentations, discussions and workshops, we received inputs in an interesting way, which we then had the opportunity to research, analyze and apply. We made some new acquaintances and got a clearer idea of how to listen to the needs of the community, how to understand them and how to involve them in the planning process through an interesting way for them and useful way for us.
 == Your Living Lab Code of Conduct ==

Kristina.tomasa: /* Collaborative Evaluation, Landscape Democracy and Living Lab Reflection */

2021-07-19T15:01:25Z

Collaborative Evaluation, Landscape Democracy and Living Lab Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 19 July 2021
Line 352:		Line 352:

	= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =		= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =
	== Collaborative Evaluation, Landscape Democracy and Living Lab Reflection ==		== Collaborative Evaluation, Landscape Democracy and Living Lab Process Reflection ==
	We started the process with the formation of the main spatial problems and challenges, which were:		We started the process with the formation of the main spatial problems and challenges, which were:

Kristina.tomasa: /* Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection */

2021-07-19T15:00:59Z

Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 19 July 2021
Line 352:		Line 352:

	= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =		= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =
	== Collaborative Evaluation ~~and~~ Landscape Democracy Reflection ==		== Collaborative Evaluation, Landscape Democracy and Living Lab Reflection ==
	We started the process with the formation of the main spatial problems and challenges, which were:		We started the process with the formation of the main spatial problems and challenges, which were:

Line 420:		Line 420:
	'''Conclusion: '''		'''Conclusion: '''
	Given the highlights, it can be concluded that the challenges that were imposed 7-8 years ago have continued to this day and that not much has changed in the city for the better in terms of cycling. Today we certainly have more bike paths than 7-8 years ago, but the problems are still the same, bike paths are non-existent in some parts of the city, while the existing ones are discontinuous and poorly maintained, technically defective, low quality and unsatisfactory. After 8 years, the importance of educating all traffic participants, the need for bicycle traffic (along with public and pedestrian) to become dominant, as well as the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to promote cycling are still to this day being emphasized. All of the above reflects the still insufficient development of the cycling infrastructure in the city of Zagreb. Based on the comparison of our views on problems and solutions and the views of the community, we conclude that our views definitely coincide and that we did not omit any important items for understanding and further solving the problem and continuing the project. In addition to the obvious technical and planning nature, we additionally focused on the social nature, so in addition to educating traffic participants and the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to encourage cycling, we placed great emphasis on active public involvement in the project process, the importance of mutual social interaction and cooperation between different social groups as well as the importance of creating a strong and happy community. In addition, an important focus was the integration of the bike path within a neighborhood level as well as the city level, where we want to see that one day the cities will be networked and connected with the bike paths which will be interconnected with green public and open spaces.		Given the highlights, it can be concluded that the challenges that were imposed 7-8 years ago have continued to this day and that not much has changed in the city for the better in terms of cycling. Today we certainly have more bike paths than 7-8 years ago, but the problems are still the same, bike paths are non-existent in some parts of the city, while the existing ones are discontinuous and poorly maintained, technically defective, low quality and unsatisfactory. After 8 years, the importance of educating all traffic participants, the need for bicycle traffic (along with public and pedestrian) to become dominant, as well as the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to promote cycling are still to this day being emphasized. All of the above reflects the still insufficient development of the cycling infrastructure in the city of Zagreb. Based on the comparison of our views on problems and solutions and the views of the community, we conclude that our views definitely coincide and that we did not omit any important items for understanding and further solving the problem and continuing the project. In addition to the obvious technical and planning nature, we additionally focused on the social nature, so in addition to educating traffic participants and the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to encourage cycling, we placed great emphasis on active public involvement in the project process, the importance of mutual social interaction and cooperation between different social groups as well as the importance of creating a strong and happy community. In addition, an important focus was the integration of the bike path within a neighborhood level as well as the city level, where we want to see that one day the cities will be networked and connected with the bike paths which will be interconnected with green public and open spaces.


	== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==		== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==

Kristina.tomasa: /* Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas */

2021-07-19T13:18:40Z

Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 19 July 2021
Line 421:		Line 421:
	Given the highlights, it can be concluded that the challenges that were imposed 7-8 years ago have continued to this day and that not much has changed in the city for the better in terms of cycling. Today we certainly have more bike paths than 7-8 years ago, but the problems are still the same, bike paths are non-existent in some parts of the city, while the existing ones are discontinuous and poorly maintained, technically defective, low quality and unsatisfactory. After 8 years, the importance of educating all traffic participants, the need for bicycle traffic (along with public and pedestrian) to become dominant, as well as the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to promote cycling are still to this day being emphasized. All of the above reflects the still insufficient development of the cycling infrastructure in the city of Zagreb. Based on the comparison of our views on problems and solutions and the views of the community, we conclude that our views definitely coincide and that we did not omit any important items for understanding and further solving the problem and continuing the project. In addition to the obvious technical and planning nature, we additionally focused on the social nature, so in addition to educating traffic participants and the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to encourage cycling, we placed great emphasis on active public involvement in the project process, the importance of mutual social interaction and cooperation between different social groups as well as the importance of creating a strong and happy community. In addition, an important focus was the integration of the bike path within a neighborhood level as well as the city level, where we want to see that one day the cities will be networked and connected with the bike paths which will be interconnected with green public and open spaces.		Given the highlights, it can be concluded that the challenges that were imposed 7-8 years ago have continued to this day and that not much has changed in the city for the better in terms of cycling. Today we certainly have more bike paths than 7-8 years ago, but the problems are still the same, bike paths are non-existent in some parts of the city, while the existing ones are discontinuous and poorly maintained, technically defective, low quality and unsatisfactory. After 8 years, the importance of educating all traffic participants, the need for bicycle traffic (along with public and pedestrian) to become dominant, as well as the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to promote cycling are still to this day being emphasized. All of the above reflects the still insufficient development of the cycling infrastructure in the city of Zagreb. Based on the comparison of our views on problems and solutions and the views of the community, we conclude that our views definitely coincide and that we did not omit any important items for understanding and further solving the problem and continuing the project. In addition to the obvious technical and planning nature, we additionally focused on the social nature, so in addition to educating traffic participants and the importance of encouraging the city government to a number of activities to encourage cycling, we placed great emphasis on active public involvement in the project process, the importance of mutual social interaction and cooperation between different social groups as well as the importance of creating a strong and happy community. In addition, an important focus was the integration of the bike path within a neighborhood level as well as the city level, where we want to see that one day the cities will be networked and connected with the bike paths which will be interconnected with green public and open spaces.

	~~<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_18.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_18.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_18.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~</gallery>~~

	== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==		== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==
Line 438:		Line 433:
	'''Local government''' - although they were not directly involved in our process, they are a very important part of this puzzle because they have the power to make decisions and implement our projects. In order for the project to go further, they would certainly get involved and evaluate our project.		'''Local government''' - although they were not directly involved in our process, they are a very important part of this puzzle because they have the power to make decisions and implement our projects. In order for the project to go further, they would certainly get involved and evaluate our project.


	~~<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_19.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_19.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_19.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~</gallery>~~

	== Reflection on the Online Seminar ==		== Reflection on the Online Seminar ==
	At the online seminar we gained new knowledge, information, instructions and techniques, which then shaped and changed the way we think and look at our professional world. Through various lectures, presentations, discussions and workshops, we received inputs in an interesting way, which we then had the opportunity to research, analyze and apply. We made some new acquaintances and got a clearer idea of how to listen to the needs of the community, how to understand them and how to involve them in the planning process through an interesting way for them and useful way for us.		At the online seminar we gained new knowledge, information, instructions and techniques, which then shaped and changed the way we think and look at our professional world. Through various lectures, presentations, discussions and workshops, we received inputs in an interesting way, which we then had the opportunity to research, analyze and apply. We made some new acquaintances and got a clearer idea of how to listen to the needs of the community, how to understand them and how to involve them in the planning process through an interesting way for them and useful way for us.


	~~<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_20.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_20.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~File:PlaceholderImage_20.jpg\|''insert text here''~~
	~~</gallery>~~

	== Reflection on the Living Lab Process ==		== Reflection on the Living Lab Process ==

Kristina.tomasa: /* Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection */

2021-07-19T13:15:58Z

Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection

@@ Line 353: / Line 353: @@
 = Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =
 == Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection ==
-*insert text here
+We started the process with the formation of the main spatial problems and challenges, which were:
 <gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

Kristina.tomasa: /* Welcome to Our Community and Their Landscape */

2021-07-19T11:15:16Z

Welcome to Our Community and Their Landscape

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 19 July 2021
Line 46:		Line 46:

	Main spatial problems are:		Main spatial problems are:
	* discontinuity of the ~~highway~~		* discontinuity of the cycleway
	* the current inadequate width		* the current inadequate width
	* the railway that acts as an obstacle in space, it divides the city of Zagreb into two parts: north and south and act as border between the neighborhoods		* the railway that acts as an obstacle in space, it divides the city of Zagreb into two parts: north and south and act as border between the neighborhoods

Kristina.tomasa: /* Process Reflection */

2021-07-19T10:04:51Z

Process Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, 19 July 2021
Line 408:		Line 408:

	== Process Reflection ==		== Process Reflection ==
	*insert text here		This whole process was a great experience that definitely changed our perspective of looking at things and gave us some new filters through which to study the world around us. It was a lot of fun and useful for us and we are happy that we had the opportunity to be a part of it.

Kristina.tomasa: /* Reflection on the Online Seminar */

2021-07-19T10:03:37Z

Reflection on the Online Seminar

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:03, 19 July 2021
Line 380:		Line 380:

	== Reflection on the Online Seminar ==		== Reflection on the Online Seminar ==
	*insert text here		At the online seminar we gained new knowledge, information, instructions and techniques, which then shaped and changed the way we think and look at our professional world. Through various lectures, presentations, discussions and workshops, we received inputs in an interesting way, which we then had the opportunity to research, analyze and apply. We made some new acquaintances and got a clearer idea of how to listen to the needs of the community, how to understand them and how to involve them in the planning process through an interesting way for them and useful way for us.


	<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">		<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">