LED2LEAP 2020 - Parc Regional Aubrac - Revision history

Remyteyssedre: /* Your Living Lab Code of Conduct */

2020-07-19T19:33:38Z

Your Living Lab Code of Conduct

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 19 July 2020
Line 505:		Line 505:
	File:Evaluated_RemyT-Aubrac (6).jpg\|''add a caption''		File:Evaluated_RemyT-Aubrac (6).jpg\|''add a caption''
	</gallery>		</gallery>

			== Process Reflection ==

	* '' What limitations have you encountered? ''		* '' What limitations have you encountered? ''

Remyteyssedre: /* Process Reflection */

2020-07-19T19:32:17Z

Process Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 19 July 2020
Line 506:		Line 506:
	</gallery>		</gallery>

	~~= Process Reflection =~~		* '' What limitations have you encountered? ''
	*''~~Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''~~		The project imagined during the seminar cannot accurately reflect reality. The participants can be more or less numerous, more or less involved. It is difficult to imagine the process correctly without interlocutors.
	*''Which limitations ~~were~~ you ~~facing~~?''
	*''What have you learnt from each other?''		* '' What would you do differently next time? ''
	*''What would you do differently next time?''		I would develop more action on the landscape, and I would explain two or three ways of prototyping the ideas of the inhabitants.
	*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
	*''250 words text''

	----		----
	[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]		[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
	[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]		[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

Remyteyssedre: /* Your Living Lab Code of Conduct */

2020-07-19T19:23:06Z

Your Living Lab Code of Conduct

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 19 July 2020
Line 496:		Line 496:

	== Your Living Lab Code of Conduct ==		== Your Living Lab Code of Conduct ==
	*’’What were the ~~main values driving your lab~~, and ~~what ground rules were set up as a result~~ of ~~that same reflection?’’~~		The next step for the landscape challenge is to measure interest of prototype and present the action plan and all project to the municipality. If they measure the interest of project we can imagine that they implement all action, with more means. This link with mayor and elected is very important.
	*''~~add~~ the ~~corresponding visual from your presentation to~~ the ~~image gallery below''~~		To convince them is essential for the continuation of the project.
			Often, without their agreements, no project is possible, participation or not. In general, they are not very open to participatory process because they don't know well.

			The principal that I'm learning from the LED seminar is the steps of process and the sequence. And, I have see tools, like design process, no used in landscape project in France. It’s tools that I use, but I don’t see landscape designer use them. This diversity of tools and example is of great interest.

	<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">		<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">
	File:~~Evaluation_conduct1~~.jpg\|''add a caption''		File:Evaluated_RemyT-Aubrac (6).jpg\|''add a caption''
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Remyteyssedre: /* Reflection of the Living Lab Process */

2020-07-19T19:22:08Z

Reflection of the Living Lab Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 19 July 2020
Line 487:		Line 487:

	== Reflection of the Living Lab Process ==		== Reflection of the Living Lab Process ==
	*’'How did COVID-19 affect the ~~living lab~~ and ~~it’s activities~~. ~~Were you~~ and the ~~community satisfied~~ with ~~them? What were~~ the ~~greatest outcomes~~, ~~outputs and impacts of~~ the ~~project? What indicators did you use to evaluate them?’'~~
	*''add the ~~corresponding visual from your presentation to~~ the ~~image gallery below''~~		The greatest outputs of project are the dynamic created between inhabitants and the awareness of locals problems by people. When they take a place for changing situation, I think that is the better. The last week I have evaluated the prototype and is interesting to do the link with the global process. The goals are almost same. The visibility is the thirst goal, but for transform the village, it’s a very long process. The transformations will be visible in 10 years.
			For measure the performances, the involve of a large part of resident is a good indicator. The goal is changed the mind, not necessary transform immediately the problem. It takes time !

	<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">		<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">
	File:~~Evaluation_process1~~.jpg\|''add a caption''		File:Evaluated_RemyT-Aubrac (4).jpg\|''add a caption''
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Remyteyssedre: /* Reflection of the Online Seminar */

2020-07-19T19:21:03Z

Reflection of the Online Seminar

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 19 July 2020
Line 472:		Line 472:

	== Reflection of the Online Seminar ==		== Reflection of the Online Seminar ==
	*’'How did the ~~pandemic affect your learning~~ and ~~your team work? Did~~ the ~~theoretical material support your~~ project ~~or did it confuse~~ the ~~process? How well did~~ the ~~assignments~~ and the ~~online challenges reflect on~~ the ~~nature of landscape democracy challenges?’~~'		The exercise offert by the team of Led2 help me during my PHD project. I have done a focus on landscape and on the link with the participatory process.
	*’'add the ~~corresponding visual from your presentation to~~ the ~~image gallery below~~''v
			The seminar Led2 and his tools is very interesting, specially all the example of project. They present many tools, methods, and implement all different. On the field, the context is very strong, and the example that you have expose are done in many situations.

			The COVID, for me isn’t directly a problem, because I’m not in a team. With the crisis I have more time for do seminar's exercises that in normal situation I can't do.

			But when I think at the precedent testing, with the natural regional park, the COVID-19 would have created lots of problems. The elderly population is very concerned by crisis and is very brittle in all territory. Do a participatory process during the COVID-19, is very difficult. Elected and institution don't take risks.

			The work phases serve the lining lab, but sometime she is long or repetitive.

	<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="4">		<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="4">
	File:~~Evaluation_seminar1~~.jpg\|''add a caption''		File:Evaluated_RemyT-Aubrac (3).jpg\|''add a caption''
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Remyteyssedre: /* The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation */

2020-07-19T19:20:15Z

The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 19 July 2020
Line 468:		Line 468:

	<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">		<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">
	~~File:~~File:Evaluated_RemyT-Aubrac (2).jpg\|’'add a caption''		File:Evaluated_RemyT-Aubrac (2).jpg\|’'add a caption''
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Remyteyssedre: /* The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation */

2020-07-19T19:19:22Z

The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 19 July 2020
Line 460:		Line 460:

	== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==		== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==
	*’'Reintroduce the ~~stakeholders that~~ are ~~going to participate in~~ the ~~visioning~~ phase~~, what~~ is the ~~existing~~ power structure~~? How has~~ that ~~structure shifted leading up to evaluation~~, and ~~how has your understanding of your role shifted?~~		The participants of project are mainly the inhabitants. In the first phase there are many, but during the prototyping, there are less, because this phase take more time and request more involvement of people. The involvement of large group of people is very interesting because she testifies of their interest.
	*''add the ~~corresponding visual from your presentation~~ to the ~~image gallery below''~~		More the group is important and more the listening of elected and of power structure are bigger.

			The mediator and the process of project have a central rôle. They are the interface between inhabitants and municipality or another institution. Elected, owners or public agents are more listened a group who develop a project, that twenty people who explain their ideas at the mayor. Together, they are more strong and there is a collective consciousness and energy.

			The mediator can be more present, and involved elected more in the participatory process. This link to local power is important for facilitated the implement of actions and the help of electeds and all resources during the prototyping.

	<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">		<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">
	File:~~Evaluation_actors1~~.jpg\|’'add a caption''		File:File:Evaluated_RemyT-Aubrac (2).jpg\|’'add a caption''
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Remyteyssedre: /* Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection */

2020-07-19T19:18:44Z

Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 19 July 2020
Line 443:		Line 443:
	= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =		= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =
	== Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection ==		== Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection ==
	*''Reiterate your landscape democracy challenge, ~~by listing~~ the ~~relevant UN Sustainable~~ Development Goals. ~~How has~~ the ~~your work with he community~~ this ~~far affect your perceptions~~ of ~~theses goals~~ in ~~regards to~~ the ~~LD challenge? How has your team~~, or ~~community partner~~, ~~modified these goals~~ over the ~~course of this course?’'~~		The first challenge consist to answer with inhabitants to the problem of the abandonment of the territory. The population is few, and more and more little. It’s abandonment concern the farming activities too, the local shops and less strong the tourism. Mainly, four elements of sustainable Development Goals are relevant of my context.
	*''add the ~~corresponding visual from your presentation~~ to the ~~image gallery below''~~		The first is the DECENT WORK AND ECONOMIC GROWTH. In this rural area there are few job. Lots of family go to neighboring city for their job. But there are many opportunities in biologic farming, in tourism, if the community develop project.

			INDUSTRIES INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE is the second goal. For develop the projects, the municipality must create or improve infrastructures. The elements are present, but in bad condition. There aren't need big infrastructures, only way for tourism, renovate heritage, terraces for vineyard and new project.

			The infrastructure must be good for territory and in agreement with the landscape.
			The third is the SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES. The village have lots of houses and heritage without occupation. It is a resource for develop the village. In the past the same village have over one thousand five hundred inhabitants, against less five hundred today. And with the agricultural area, they can develop projects sustainable.

			The last is the LIFE ON LAND. Is goal is in link to the work of human. In the past, the community have created lots of ecosystems by the agriculture. The vineyard, with is terrace, is an artificial ecosystem very rich, that the forest eat because there are less and fewer activities.

			All community goals, with a vision, of inhabit the territory, are goals for long run.

	<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">		<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">
	File:~~Evaluation_scene1~~.jpg\|''add a caption''		File:Evaluated_RemyT-Aubrac (1).jpg\|''add a caption''
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Nicolasr: /* Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning */

2020-07-10T21:49:23Z

Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning

@@ Line 441: / Line 441: @@
 </gallery>
-= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
+= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =
-''* template coming''
+== Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection ==
-= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
+<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="5">
-''* template coming''
+File:Evaluation_scene1.jpg|''add a caption''
 = Process Reflection =

Remyteyssedre: /* Your Prototyping Action */

2020-07-06T13:16:32Z

Your Prototyping Action

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:16, 6 July 2020
Line 383:		Line 383:

	<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="3">		<gallery caption=" " widths="400px" heights="300px" perrow="3">
	File:~~yourcase_prototype1~~.jpg\|''Goals and prototyping action''		File:PhaseD-Prototyping_Plan_de_travail_1.jpg\|''Goals and prototyping action''
	</gallery>		</gallery>