LED2LEAP 2020 - Nuertingen Team 3 - Revision history

Thaserv: /* Process Reflection */

2020-07-18T12:05:30Z

Process Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 18 July 2020
Line 325:		Line 325:

	= Process Reflection =		= Process Reflection =
	*~~''Reflect in your intercultural~~ and ~~interdisciplinary~~ team on the ~~outcomes~~ of ~~your study''~~		*Reflection on the work and team
	*''Which limitations were ~~you~~ facing?''		We had interesting and enriching session-times. It was a great possibility to get to know the mode of operation and the mindset of people from all over the world.
	*''What have ~~you~~ learnt ~~from each other?''~~		Impressive to see how large the bandwidth of projects with regards to landscape democracy challenges are.
	*''What would ~~you~~ do differently ~~next~~ time~~?''~~		We enjoyed getting an impression from other projects. Not just seeing the results but being kind of a part of the process and receiving updates about the development of the different projects.
	*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
	*''250 words text''		*Which limitations we were facing
			Sometimes the language was quite a barrier. We had to concentrate strongly to stay with in. Often it was difficult to understand the people. And it was challenging to relate to persons because only having a black or just small picture doesn't makes them recognizable.

			*What we have learnt
			We learnt to strengthen our values about interaction and integration of the residents. Because of the Corona-Situation we had to be creative in terms of the participation method. To get in touch with the people we had to think of new ways and possibilities, which in the end was quite successful.
			We liked the external view on our project. New questions and suggestions were coming up and promoted us.

			*What we would do differently
			Not having the Corona background it would have been much easier. Next time we would like to get in touch and interact with the people in real, not just through postcards. We think that would be even more intensive and lead to dialogues which is very important.

Thaserv: /* Your Living Lab Code of Conduct */

2020-07-18T12:01:52Z

Your Living Lab Code of Conduct

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 18 July 2020
Line 318:		Line 318:

	== Your Living Lab Code of Conduct ==		== Your Living Lab Code of Conduct ==
	*’’What were the main values ~~driving your lab~~, and ~~what~~ ground rules ~~were set up as~~ a ~~result~~ of that ~~same reflection?’’~~		The main values are sense of identity, sense of community and also safety on the streets. For the top ground rules the reflection is a very important step in every process and to test ideas on friends and acquaintances before using them. The possibility to always ask for feedback is essentially important, because you are often restricted in your own way of thinking and lose the overall view. To finish with our key values and principles that got indispensable in the whole intervention process are creating together, rethink old values to integrate new, encourage exchange, promote diversity, design for people and to share the power of design, so everybody gets involved in the designing process and can voice their ideas.
	*''add the ~~corresponding visual from your presentation~~ to the ~~image gallery below''~~

	<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">		<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">

Thaserv: /* Reflection of the Living Lab Process */

2020-07-18T12:00:41Z

Reflection of the Living Lab Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:00, 18 July 2020
Line 299:		Line 299:

	== Reflection of the Living Lab Process ==		== Reflection of the Living Lab Process ==
	*~~’'How did COVID~~-19 ~~affect~~ the ~~living lab~~ and ~~it’s activities~~. ~~Were you~~ and the ~~community satisfied~~ with ~~them? What were~~ the ~~greatest outcomes~~, ~~outputs~~ and ~~impacts~~ of the ~~project? What indicators did you~~ use ~~to evaluate them?’'~~		*The greatest outputs were the results we got from different age groups and the variety of different ideas. The citizens have used the postcards not only to communicate good ideas and inspiration but also to vent their frustration. It has been a good valve to relieve frustration, for a large group.

			We had also no chance to get in direct contact with the residents, only when we delivered the postcards, we talked to some about our project. In this situation, they were able to contribute well to our design process of the whole project because of the postcard intervention.

			One indicator to measure the performance is the amount of feedback and we fortunately got a lot of feedback.

			The participants of the intervention got to see some new ideas how some problematic locations could be turned into something new. We think that they liked the intervention, not at least because it was anonymously. The intervention also gave them the possibility to participate during the design process of the whole intervention despite of this Covid-19 situation.
			*The challenge is not always what we thought in the beginning, they are often more deeply rooted. A detailed analysis leads to the important and essential challenges. The next step would be to incorporate the results of the postcards of the residents into the draft and to present the drafts again to them in a public participation.

			The five aspects that we learned during the Led2Leap seminar are how important reflection is in the whole process of discovering the challenges and also the participative intervention. We tried our best with the framework of the postcard intervention this time, but the next time we would change some things and evaluate more. Giving the residents an even better opportunity to follow the evaluation process is also an important lesson for us. To use the learnt possibilities and also the knowledge from the postcard intervention in the future could be a good experience to make use of it. And the last one is to gather more experience to be able to use it for yourself and fall back on it.

	<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">		<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">

Thaserv: /* Reflection of the Online Seminar */

2020-07-18T11:57:06Z

Reflection of the Online Seminar

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:57, 18 July 2020
Line 285:		Line 285:

	== Reflection of the Online Seminar ==		== Reflection of the Online Seminar ==
	*’'How did the ~~pandemic affect your learning~~ and ~~your team~~ work~~? Did~~ the ~~theoretical material support your project or did~~ it ~~confuse~~ the ~~process? How well did~~ the ~~assignments~~ and the ~~online challenges~~ reflect on the ~~nature~~ of ~~landscape democracy challenges?’'~~		The teaching and learning method helped us to get very clear about the present challenges and to concretize the problems. We learned a lot of different methods to incorporate the community and to be very creative in the interventions, which helped us to be free in our design process of the postcards intervention. It also helped us to reflect on our process and if our method will work how we think it will.

			We couldn’t work in one place at first and everything took much more time and was less effective. But some months later in the design process of our intervention we worked together, so it was a lot easier for us to discuss about our ideas for the first prototypes. So later everything became more interactive again and our project made good progress.

			The course phases helped us to reflect our landscape democracy challenge from the beginning and dive deeper into that topic step by step.

			The assignment of the different phases helped us to reflect the phase in which we were in the intervention, to look back and see what was good and what should be changed the next time. So because of the good reflection, we learned very much about participative intervention and we collected first experiences in this specific field of work of our job.

	<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">		<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">

Thaserv: /* The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation */

2020-07-18T11:55:11Z

The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:55, 18 July 2020
Line 272:		Line 272:

	== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==		== The Actors in your Collaborative Evaluation ==
	*’'Reintroduce the stakeholders ~~that~~ are ~~going~~ to ~~participate~~ in the ~~visioning phase, what is~~ the ~~existing power structure? How has~~ that ~~structure shifted leading up to evaluation~~, and ~~how has your understanding~~ of ~~your~~ role ~~shifted?~~		The power structure in the quarter is in a constant change. Through the intervention process of the postcards, we got to know which stakeholders are important for the residents of Klein-Tischardt and which should have more influence and power. Some of them are the city administration, because they must take their leading role to change the problematic situations and also the gastronomy and the small businesses must have a stronger voice and be more present. Less visible in the postcard intervention were the senior citizens and also the tourists as stakeholders in Klein-Tischardt are not that visible.

			Trough our method, we created a connection for the different interest groups and one aspect of our role was also to set the frame for the intervention and the whole designing process that comes with it. We had to organize everything like to obtain the mail boxes and the other materials.

			Some aspects which we would change in retrospect are to make the framework easier to understand and to plan more time to evaluate the postcards. Also one important point is distributing the exact same postcards to each household.

	<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">		<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">

Thaserv: /* Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection */

2020-07-18T11:53:16Z

Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 18 July 2020
Line 262:		Line 262:
	== Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection ==		== Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection ==
	The four main challenges in Klein-Tischardt are strengthening diversity and preserving traditions, entrances and hotspots, Klein-Tischardt by the water and revitalize public space. Those four challenges have accompanied us from the beginning. For the sustainable development goals the goal 9, 10 and 11 are the most important for our project. So the industry, innovation and infrastructure are important for us, because we want to revive the ground floor zone to revitalize the street and public space. Also to reduce inequalities and to strengthen the diversity is a big challenge for us and an important topic in our project. The sustainable cities and communities reflects our third challenge Klein-Tischardt by the water and our goal to bring the green infrastructure from the Neckarufer to the quarter and to make it more visible.		The four main challenges in Klein-Tischardt are strengthening diversity and preserving traditions, entrances and hotspots, Klein-Tischardt by the water and revitalize public space. Those four challenges have accompanied us from the beginning. For the sustainable development goals the goal 9, 10 and 11 are the most important for our project. So the industry, innovation and infrastructure are important for us, because we want to revive the ground floor zone to revitalize the street and public space. Also to reduce inequalities and to strengthen the diversity is a big challenge for us and an important topic in our project. The sustainable cities and communities reflects our third challenge Klein-Tischardt by the water and our goal to bring the green infrastructure from the Neckarufer to the quarter and to make it more visible.

	By forming a strategy, we could master our four landscape democracy challenges. In order to approach our challenges, we planned long term and short term interventions, which helped us to face some difficult problems and to overcome them. By planning this intervention we want to draw attention to the present problems. And to add more dimensions, we wanted to add our tool, which was the postcards from the future. With this tool, the residents got a possibility to let us know about their voice, so they can express their thoughts. This also has the aim to strengthen the exchange between the residents. In the process, we took the leading role to organize the whole project and the intervention. Our role was also to encourage the residents to think about their wishes and goals for the future. The idea was to give input to criticize given situations and to promote their creativity, to overthink those situations and to search for good solutions for everybody.		By forming a strategy, we could master our four landscape democracy challenges. In order to approach our challenges, we planned long term and short term interventions, which helped us to face some difficult problems and to overcome them. By planning this intervention we want to draw attention to the present problems. And to add more dimensions, we wanted to add our tool, which was the postcards from the future. With this tool, the residents got a possibility to let us know about their voice, so they can express their thoughts. This also has the aim to strengthen the exchange between the residents. In the process, we took the leading role to organize the whole project and the intervention. Our role was also to encourage the residents to think about their wishes and goals for the future. The idea was to give input to criticize given situations and to promote their creativity, to overthink those situations and to search for good solutions for everybody.

Thaserv: /* Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection */

2020-07-18T11:53:05Z

Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:53, 18 July 2020
Line 261:		Line 261:
	= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =		= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas =
	== Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection ==		== Collaborative Evaluation and Landscape Democracy Reflection ==
	*''Reiterate your landscape democracy challenge, by ~~listing~~ the ~~relevant UN Sustainable Development Goals~~. ~~How has~~ the ~~your work with he community this far affect your perceptions of theses~~ goals in ~~regards~~ to the ~~LD challenge? How~~ has ~~your team~~, ~~or community partner, modified these~~ goals ~~over~~ the ~~course of this course?’'~~		The four main challenges in Klein-Tischardt are strengthening diversity and preserving traditions, entrances and hotspots, Klein-Tischardt by the water and revitalize public space. Those four challenges have accompanied us from the beginning. For the sustainable development goals the goal 9, 10 and 11 are the most important for our project. So the industry, innovation and infrastructure are important for us, because we want to revive the ground floor zone to revitalize the street and public space. Also to reduce inequalities and to strengthen the diversity is a big challenge for us and an important topic in our project. The sustainable cities and communities reflects our third challenge Klein-Tischardt by the water and our goal to bring the green infrastructure from the Neckarufer to the quarter and to make it more visible.
			By forming a strategy, we could master our four landscape democracy challenges. In order to approach our challenges, we planned long term and short term interventions, which helped us to face some difficult problems and to overcome them. By planning this intervention we want to draw attention to the present problems. And to add more dimensions, we wanted to add our tool, which was the postcards from the future. With this tool, the residents got a possibility to let us know about their voice, so they can express their thoughts. This also has the aim to strengthen the exchange between the residents. In the process, we took the leading role to organize the whole project and the intervention. Our role was also to encourage the residents to think about their wishes and goals for the future. The idea was to give input to criticize given situations and to promote their creativity, to overthink those situations and to search for good solutions for everybody.

	<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">		<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">

Thaserv at 10:51, 16 July 2020

2020-07-16T10:51:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 16 July 2020
Line 15:		Line 15:
	\| '''Country''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|Germany		\| '''Country''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|Germany
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''Topics''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|Strengthening diversity and preserving traditions		\| '''Topics''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|Strengthening diversity and preserving traditions, entrances and hotspots, Klein-Tischardt by the water and revitalize public space
	\|-		\|-
	\| '''Author(s)''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|Leila Hoffmann, Carolin Lenz, Chiara Marquart, Vanessa Thaser		\| '''Author(s)''' \|\| style="background:Lavender"\|Leila Hoffmann, Carolin Lenz, Chiara Marquart, Vanessa Thaser

Thaserv: /* Your Living Lab Code of Conduct */

2020-07-15T14:35:55Z

Your Living Lab Code of Conduct

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 15 July 2020
Line 301:		Line 301:

	<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">		<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
	File:~~Evaluation_conduct1~~.jpg\|~~''add a caption''~~		File:Code of conduct.jpg\|Code of conduct
	</gallery>		</gallery>

Thaserv: /* Reflection of the Living Lab Process */

2020-07-15T14:35:02Z

Reflection of the Living Lab Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 15 July 2020
Line 292:		Line 292:
	File:Reflection on our Living Lab process.jpg\|Reflection on our Living Lab process		File:Reflection on our Living Lab process.jpg\|Reflection on our Living Lab process
	File:Reflection on our Living Lab process 2.jpg\|Reflection on our Living Lab process		File:Reflection on our Living Lab process 2.jpg\|Reflection on our Living Lab process
			File:What we have learned - translating the evaluation results into goals and actions.jpg\|What we have learned - translating the evaluation results into goals and actions for the future
			File:What we have learned.jpg\|What we have learned
	</gallery>		</gallery>