Ledwiki - User contributions [en]

LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

2016-05-15T18:35:05Z

Verah: /* What are the major challenges for changing the situation? */

'''--> [[LED_Online_Seminar_2016_-_Working_Group_B|back to your group page]]'''

'''''Please add the title of your case study here and replace the dummy image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="250pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Tempelhofer Feld''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Vera Hausmanns''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Das Tempelhofer Feld.jpeg|250px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==

I have chosen the challenge of the "Tempelhofer Feld" because I have examined this case very detailed for another seminar which had the topic of collective processes in the society here in Germany. This challenge can show you how top-down participation can fail and how the people start to fight for their own interests because they were ignored by the government.

In the 1990s planning for a new airport in Berlin has been started and within the planning to close the Tempelhof airport. But what should you do with such a big open space in Berlin. So the government planned to build some houses at the edge of airfield and in the middle of the ring of houses there should be a planned park. In 2008 the government closed the airport, because in 2017 there should be the international horticulture exhibition at this place and the Berlin-Brandenburg airport should be opened. For the planning of the international horticulture exhibition there has been a competition with participation after the winner has been chosen. The "Tempelhofer Feld" has been closed for two years. After these two years the government has opened this place for the citizens and for chosen urban pioneers. During this two years the top down participation of the competition has failed and the people start to protest against the plans of the government, because I they like the new open space very much. They didn't want to have buildings on the airfield and they didn't want to have an international horticulture exhibition there. They have started to collect signatures to realise a referendum. They needed three tries to realise it. Then the day of the referendum has come and the citizens of Berlin have decided that the "Tempelhofer Feld" should be an open space. The government has to sign a "Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz", a law that this place has to be open space.

== Representation of your observations ==
* ''you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques''
* ''possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay''
* ''please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 1.jpg|case representation
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg|new developments

</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
*I think here in Germany governmental planning projects need too much time. The government has made plans for the “Tempelhofer Feld” and has started to participate people and their ideas. The failure of the governmental plans has been that they opened the old airfield for the public, the people like it and after two years when it’s time to start the construction process for the international horticulture exhibition 2017 they wanted to close the area again. That’s why people started to protest. You can’t give an area to them, they love it and you can’t subduct it in such an easy way. And now they are going to make a mistake again. They gave the “Templerhofer Feld Gesetz” to the people to protect the area of building houses after the referendum. Now the government is going to change that law for building some parts of a refugee camp on it. How should a citizen believe such a government?

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===
*According to the “Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz” it is forbidden to build something on the protected area. A solution for losing the last believe into the government might be to assemble tents on meadow area or other temporary buildings. Because we all know that the refugees have underwent a lot of bad things and we have the responsibility to let them live like “normal” people and not like nomads. I think any kind of temporary buildings might be a reasonable compromise between the promises of the government and current refugee situation here in Germany. So you have the possibility to remove the temporary buildings when the refugee camp will close and you can give the old appearance to the meadow area. Thereby it would be a temporary infringement of the “Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz”. In my opinion, this could be a solution with that all involved parties could be happy.

== References ==
*http://www.thf-berlin.de/tempelhofer-feld/ (Only German)
*http://www.thf100.de/start.html (Only German)

* ''Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''
* ''Do '''not''' use any images of which you do '''not''' hold the copyright.''
* ''Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Challenge 2016]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

2016-05-15T18:34:42Z

Verah: /* Representation of your observations */

'''--> [[LED_Online_Seminar_2016_-_Working_Group_B|back to your group page]]'''

'''''Please add the title of your case study here and replace the dummy image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="250pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Tempelhofer Feld''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Vera Hausmanns''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Das Tempelhofer Feld.jpeg|250px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==

I have chosen the challenge of the "Tempelhofer Feld" because I have examined this case very detailed for another seminar which had the topic of collective processes in the society here in Germany. This challenge can show you how top-down participation can fail and how the people start to fight for their own interests because they were ignored by the government.

In the 1990s planning for a new airport in Berlin has been started and within the planning to close the Tempelhof airport. But what should you do with such a big open space in Berlin. So the government planned to build some houses at the edge of airfield and in the middle of the ring of houses there should be a planned park. In 2008 the government closed the airport, because in 2017 there should be the international horticulture exhibition at this place and the Berlin-Brandenburg airport should be opened. For the planning of the international horticulture exhibition there has been a competition with participation after the winner has been chosen. The "Tempelhofer Feld" has been closed for two years. After these two years the government has opened this place for the citizens and for chosen urban pioneers. During this two years the top down participation of the competition has failed and the people start to protest against the plans of the government, because I they like the new open space very much. They didn't want to have buildings on the airfield and they didn't want to have an international horticulture exhibition there. They have started to collect signatures to realise a referendum. They needed three tries to realise it. Then the day of the referendum has come and the citizens of Berlin have decided that the "Tempelhofer Feld" should be an open space. The government has to sign a "Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz", a law that this place has to be open space.

== Representation of your observations ==
* ''you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques''
* ''possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay''
* ''please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 1.jpg|case representation
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg|new developments

</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
*I think here in Germany governmental planning projects need to much time. The government has made plans for the “Tempelhofer Feld” and has started to participate people and their ideas. The failure of the governmental plans has been that they opened the old airfield for the public, the people like it and after two years when it’s time to start the construction process for the international horticulture exhibition 2017 they wanted to close the area again. That’s why people started to protest. You can’t give an area to them, they love it and you can’t subduct it in such an easy way. And now they are going to make a mistake again. They gave the “Templerhofer Feld Gesetz” to the people to protect the area of building houses after the referendum. Now the government is going to change that law for building some parts of a refugee camp on it. How should a citizen believe such a government?

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===
*According to the “Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz” it is forbidden to build something on the protected area. A solution for losing the last believe into the government might be to assemble tents on meadow area or other temporary buildings. Because we all know that the refugees have underwent a lot of bad things and we have the responsibility to let them live like “normal” people and not like nomads. I think any kind of temporary buildings might be a reasonable compromise between the promises of the government and current refugee situation here in Germany. So you have the possibility to remove the temporary buildings when the refugee camp will close and you can give the old appearance to the meadow area. Thereby it would be a temporary infringement of the “Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz”. In my opinion, this could be a solution with that all involved parties could be happy.

== References ==
*http://www.thf-berlin.de/tempelhofer-feld/ (Only German)
*http://www.thf100.de/start.html (Only German)

* ''Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''
* ''Do '''not''' use any images of which you do '''not''' hold the copyright.''
* ''Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Challenge 2016]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

2016-05-15T18:32:32Z

Verah: /* References */

'''--> [[LED_Online_Seminar_2016_-_Working_Group_B|back to your group page]]'''

'''''Please add the title of your case study here and replace the dummy image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="250pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Tempelhofer Feld''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Vera Hausmanns''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Das Tempelhofer Feld.jpeg|250px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==

I have chosen the challenge of the "Tempelhofer Feld" because I have examined this case very detailed for another seminar which had the topic of collective processes in the society here in Germany. This challenge can show you how top-down participation can fail and how the people start to fight for their own interests because they were ignored by the government.

In the 1990s planning for a new airport in Berlin has been started and within the planning to close the Tempelhof airport. But what should you do with such a big open space in Berlin. So the government planned to build some houses at the edge of airfield and in the middle of the ring of houses there should be a planned park. In 2008 the government closed the airport, because in 2017 there should be the international horticulture exhibition at this place and the Berlin-Brandenburg airport should be opened. For the planning of the international horticulture exhibition there has been a competition with participation after the winner has been chosen. The "Tempelhofer Feld" has been closed for two years. After these two years the government has opened this place for the citizens and for chosen urban pioneers. During this two years the top down participation of the competition has failed and the people start to protest against the plans of the government, because I they like the new open space very much. They didn't want to have buildings on the airfield and they didn't want to have an international horticulture exhibition there. They have started to collect signatures to realise a referendum. They needed three tries to realise it. Then the day of the referendum has come and the citizens of Berlin have decided that the "Tempelhofer Feld" should be an open space. The government has to sign a "Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz", a law that this place has to be open space.

== Representation of your observations ==
* ''you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques''
* ''possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay''
* ''please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 1.jpg|case representation
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg|new developments
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
*I think here in Germany governmental planning projects need to much time. The government has made plans for the “Tempelhofer Feld” and has started to participate people and their ideas. The failure of the governmental plans has been that they opened the old airfield for the public, the people like it and after two years when it’s time to start the construction process for the international horticulture exhibition 2017 they wanted to close the area again. That’s why people started to protest. You can’t give an area to them, they love it and you can’t subduct it in such an easy way. And now they are going to make a mistake again. They gave the “Templerhofer Feld Gesetz” to the people to protect the area of building houses after the referendum. Now the government is going to change that law for building some parts of a refugee camp on it. How should a citizen believe such a government?

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===
*According to the “Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz” it is forbidden to build something on the protected area. A solution for losing the last believe into the government might be to assemble tents on meadow area or other temporary buildings. Because we all know that the refugees have underwent a lot of bad things and we have the responsibility to let them live like “normal” people and not like nomads. I think any kind of temporary buildings might be a reasonable compromise between the promises of the government and current refugee situation here in Germany. So you have the possibility to remove the temporary buildings when the refugee camp will close and you can give the old appearance to the meadow area. Thereby it would be a temporary infringement of the “Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz”. In my opinion, this could be a solution with that all involved parties could be happy.

== References ==
*http://www.thf-berlin.de/tempelhofer-feld/ (Only German)
*http://www.thf100.de/start.html (Only German)

* ''Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''
* ''Do '''not''' use any images of which you do '''not''' hold the copyright.''
* ''Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Challenge 2016]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

2016-05-15T18:27:24Z

Verah: /* What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? */

'''--> [[LED_Online_Seminar_2016_-_Working_Group_B|back to your group page]]'''

'''''Please add the title of your case study here and replace the dummy image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="250pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Tempelhofer Feld''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Vera Hausmanns''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Das Tempelhofer Feld.jpeg|250px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==

I have chosen the challenge of the "Tempelhofer Feld" because I have examined this case very detailed for another seminar which had the topic of collective processes in the society here in Germany. This challenge can show you how top-down participation can fail and how the people start to fight for their own interests because they were ignored by the government.

In the 1990s planning for a new airport in Berlin has been started and within the planning to close the Tempelhof airport. But what should you do with such a big open space in Berlin. So the government planned to build some houses at the edge of airfield and in the middle of the ring of houses there should be a planned park. In 2008 the government closed the airport, because in 2017 there should be the international horticulture exhibition at this place and the Berlin-Brandenburg airport should be opened. For the planning of the international horticulture exhibition there has been a competition with participation after the winner has been chosen. The "Tempelhofer Feld" has been closed for two years. After these two years the government has opened this place for the citizens and for chosen urban pioneers. During this two years the top down participation of the competition has failed and the people start to protest against the plans of the government, because I they like the new open space very much. They didn't want to have buildings on the airfield and they didn't want to have an international horticulture exhibition there. They have started to collect signatures to realise a referendum. They needed three tries to realise it. Then the day of the referendum has come and the citizens of Berlin have decided that the "Tempelhofer Feld" should be an open space. The government has to sign a "Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz", a law that this place has to be open space.

== Representation of your observations ==
* ''you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques''
* ''possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay''
* ''please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 1.jpg|case representation
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg|new developments
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
*I think here in Germany governmental planning projects need to much time. The government has made plans for the “Tempelhofer Feld” and has started to participate people and their ideas. The failure of the governmental plans has been that they opened the old airfield for the public, the people like it and after two years when it’s time to start the construction process for the international horticulture exhibition 2017 they wanted to close the area again. That’s why people started to protest. You can’t give an area to them, they love it and you can’t subduct it in such an easy way. And now they are going to make a mistake again. They gave the “Templerhofer Feld Gesetz” to the people to protect the area of building houses after the referendum. Now the government is going to change that law for building some parts of a refugee camp on it. How should a citizen believe such a government?

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===
*According to the “Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz” it is forbidden to build something on the protected area. A solution for losing the last believe into the government might be to assemble tents on meadow area or other temporary buildings. Because we all know that the refugees have underwent a lot of bad things and we have the responsibility to let them live like “normal” people and not like nomads. I think any kind of temporary buildings might be a reasonable compromise between the promises of the government and current refugee situation here in Germany. So you have the possibility to remove the temporary buildings when the refugee camp will close and you can give the old appearance to the meadow area. Thereby it would be a temporary infringement of the “Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz”. In my opinion, this could be a solution with that all involved parties could be happy.

== References ==
*...
*....
*...

* ''Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''
* ''Do '''not''' use any images of which you do '''not''' hold the copyright.''
* ''Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Challenge 2016]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

2016-05-15T18:05:43Z

Verah: /* What are the major challenges for changing the situation? */

'''--> [[LED_Online_Seminar_2016_-_Working_Group_B|back to your group page]]'''

'''''Please add the title of your case study here and replace the dummy image with a characteristic image of your site'''''

{| align="right" width="250pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Place name''' ||style="background:Lavender"| '' Tempelhofer Feld''
|-
| '''Location''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Berlin''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Vera Hausmanns''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Das Tempelhofer Feld.jpeg|250px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

== Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? ==

I have chosen the challenge of the "Tempelhofer Feld" because I have examined this case very detailed for another seminar which had the topic of collective processes in the society here in Germany. This challenge can show you how top-down participation can fail and how the people start to fight for their own interests because they were ignored by the government.

In the 1990s planning for a new airport in Berlin has been started and within the planning to close the Tempelhof airport. But what should you do with such a big open space in Berlin. So the government planned to build some houses at the edge of airfield and in the middle of the ring of houses there should be a planned park. In 2008 the government closed the airport, because in 2017 there should be the international horticulture exhibition at this place and the Berlin-Brandenburg airport should be opened. For the planning of the international horticulture exhibition there has been a competition with participation after the winner has been chosen. The "Tempelhofer Feld" has been closed for two years. After these two years the government has opened this place for the citizens and for chosen urban pioneers. During this two years the top down participation of the competition has failed and the people start to protest against the plans of the government, because I they like the new open space very much. They didn't want to have buildings on the airfield and they didn't want to have an international horticulture exhibition there. They have started to collect signatures to realise a referendum. They needed three tries to realise it. Then the day of the referendum has come and the citizens of Berlin have decided that the "Tempelhofer Feld" should be an open space. The government has to sign a "Tempelhofer Feld Gesetz", a law that this place has to be open space.

== Representation of your observations ==
* ''you are basically free to use one or a mix of different presentation techniques''
* ''possibilities are: analytical drawings, graphical representations, collages, video clips, comic/graphic novel, written essay/visual essay''
* ''please add any visual material to the gallery, videos can be placed below, you may add text as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 1.jpg|case representation
Image:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg|new developments
Image:yourfilename3.jpg|case representation
Image:yourfilename4.jpg|case representation
</gallery>

== Reflection ==
=== What are the major challenges for changing the situation? ===
*I think here in Germany governmental planning projects need to much time. The government has made plans for the “Tempelhofer Feld” and has started to participate people and their ideas. The failure of the governmental plans has been that they opened the old airfield for the public, the people like it and after two years when it’s time to start the construction process for the international horticulture exhibition 2017 they wanted to close the area again. That’s why people started to protest. You can’t give an area to them, they love it and you can’t subduct it in such an easy way. And now they are going to make a mistake again. They gave the “Templerhofer Feld Gesetz” to the people to protect the area of building houses after the referendum. Now the government is going to change that law for building some parts of a refugee camp on it. How should a citizen believe such a government?

=== What could be a starting point for democractically-based change? ===
*''Please add approx. 150 words in essay style''

== References ==
*...
*....
*...

* ''Please make sure that you give proper references of all external resources used.''
* ''Do '''not''' use any images of which you do '''not''' hold the copyright.''
* ''Please add internet links to other resources if necessary.''

----
[[Category:Landscape Democracy Challenge 2016]]

About categories: You can add more categories with this tag: "[[Category:Category Name]]", add your categories

File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg

2016-05-15T17:32:36Z

Verah: Verah uploaded a new version of File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg

File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg

2016-05-15T17:32:09Z

Verah: Verah uploaded a new version of File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg

File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg

2016-05-15T17:30:19Z

Verah: Verah uploaded a new version of File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg

LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

2016-05-15T17:13:39Z

Verah: /* Representation of your observations */

File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg

2016-05-15T17:09:57Z

Verah: Verah uploaded a new version of File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg

File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 2.jpg

2016-05-15T17:02:52Z

Verah:

File:TempelhoferFeld1 Seite 1 Seite 1.jpg

2016-05-15T17:01:49Z

Verah:

LED Online Seminar 2016 Groups Readings Selection Page

2016-05-15T10:50:23Z

Verah: /* Reading Selection Group B */

'''--> Back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2016|working group overview]]'''

'''--> Back to [[Resources_and_Literature_Landscape_and_Democracy|literature overview]]'''

*''Please add your reading selections per group per topic, minimum: one selection per topic for the [[Assignment_1:_Reading_and_Synthesizing_Core_Terminology|terminology exercise]]''

== Reading Selection Group A ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:

* Landscape Concepts:
* [HD] "Reading the landscape. An appreciation of W.G. Hoskins and J-B. Jackson
* HG: Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful? in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)
* PF: Kucan, Ana (2007). Constructing Landscape Conceptions. In: ECLAS (ed.). JoLA spring 2007, 30-41. Munich: Callwey
* AK: Antrop, Marc; Kühne, Olaf (2015) Concepts of Landscape, in: Landscape Culture - Culturing Landscapes. The Differentiated Construction of Landscapes (Bruns, Kühne, Schönwald, Theile ed.).

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* [HD] Hester, Randolph (1999): A Refrain with a View,
* PF: Davis, Mike (1990): Fortress Los Angeles: The Militarization of Urban Space, From: City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles
* AK: Gaventa, John: The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts.

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* PF: Spirn, Anne (2005): Restoring Mill Creek
* AK: Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.

'''D: The Design Process'''
* HG: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities
* PF: Salgado, Mariana, et al. (2015): Designing with Immigrants
* AK: Salgado, Mariana, et al. (2015): Designing with Immigrants

'''E: Communication'''
* PF: 'Reading the Landscape' by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu
* AK: Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands

== Reading Selection Group B ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions: ''add your selection''
* Landscape Concepts: (reader Serena Indaco) Meinig, D. W. (1979): "The Beholding Eye: Ten Versions of the Same Scene

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press
* VH: Burckhardt, Lucius (1974): Who plans the planning? in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* ''Hester, Randolph (2006). Design of Ecological Democracy'':

'''D: The Design Process'''
* ''add your selection'':

'''E: Communication'''
* ''add your selection''

== Reading Selection Group C ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* '''Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''':
* DE: The Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
* NT: The European Landscape Convention
* HO: The European Landscape Convention
* '''Landscape Concepts''':
* DE: Meinig, D. W. (1979): "The Beholding Eye: Ten Versions of the Same Scene." In: The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays, edited by D. W. Meinig and John Brinckerhoff Jackson, 33-48. New York: Oxford University Press.
* DE: Sieverts, Thomas (2003): Cities without cities. An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. English language ed. London: Spon Press.
* NT: Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City
* HO: Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful? in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)
* HO: Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City
'''B: Concepts of Participation''':
* DE: Hester, Randolph (1999): A Refrain with a View, UC Berkeley
* NT: Hester, Randolph (2012): Evaluating Community Design, Landscape Journal
* HO: Burckhardt, Lucius (1957): Urban Planning and Democracy in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)
'''C: Community and Identity''':
* DE: Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.
* HO: Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure, Landscape Ecology, vol. 10 no. 4.
'''D: The Design Process''':
* DE: Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness
* DE: Hester, Randolph: Democratic Drawing - Techniques for Participatory Design
* NT: Pritzker Prize winning architect Alejandro Aravena on sustainable design and community involvement in Chile
* HO: Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness
'''E: Communication''':
* DE: Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands

== Reading Selection Group D ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''

'''* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:'''
* [JS] The European Landscape Convention

'''* Landscape Concepts:'''
* [TH] JB Jackson (1980): The necessity for ruins and other topics, 113-126.

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* [TH] Consensus Design by Christopher Day (2002)''
* [JS] Gaventa, John: The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts
* [EN] Landscape and sustainability, theme 2: Social learning, rights and responsibilities

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* [EF] Culture and Changing Landscape Structure

'''D: The Design Process'''
* [EN] Design for social sustainability, a framework for creating a thriving new communities

'''E: Communication'''
* [JS] Reading the Landscape' by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu

== Reading Selection Group E ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:

* ''Kjersti: Presentation of the report Landscape and democracy: prospects by Yves Luginbühl for the Council of Europe''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'The Aarhus Convention':
* ''Gabriela: '': Water Framework Directive
* ''Sanaz: '': Landscape Democracy Resolution(IFLA-Europe)

* Landscape Concepts:

* ''Kjersti: Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Sieverts, Thomas (2003): Cities without cities. An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt':
* ''Gabriela: '': 'Meinig, D. W. (1979): "The Beholding Eye: Ten Versions of the Same Scene'
* ''Sanaz: '': Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design':
* ''Gabriela: '': Sanoff, Henry (2014): Multiple Views of Participatory Design, Focus
* ''Sanaz: '': Gaventa, John: The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts
* ''Kjersti: David, Harvey (2003): The Right to the City + LIFEscape Handbook on Participative Landscape Planning'':

'''C: Community and Identity'''

* ''Kjersti: SEISMIC project, An urban research and innovation project across 10 European countries'':

* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure':
* ''Gabriela: '': Francis, Mark: A Case Study Method for Landscape Architecture
* ''Sanaz: '': Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy, The MIT Press

'''D: The Design Process'''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Pritzker Prize winning architect Alejandro Aravena on sustainable design and community involvement in Chile':
* ''Gabriela: '': Hester, Randolph: Democratic Drawing - Techniques for Participatory Design
* ''Sanaz: '': Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities
* ''Kjersti: Ruggeri, Deni (2004): Crafting Westport + Hussain, Sofia, et al. (2012): Participatory Design with Marginalized People in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunties Experienced in a Field Study in Cambodia'':

'''E: Communication'''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands':
* ''Gabriela: '': 'Reading the Landscape' by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu
* ''Sanaz: '': 'Reading the Landscape' by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu

* ''Kjersti: online decisionmaking with Loomio'':

== Reading Selection Group F ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''

'''Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''':
* ''Mario: Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive''
'''Landscape Concepts''':
* ''Mario: Cosgrove, Denis. (1985): Prospect, Perspective and the Evolution of the Landscape Idea. In: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, Vol. 10, No. 1 (1985),pp. 45-62. Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).''
* '''(IM)'' Kucan, Ana (2007). Constructing Landscape Conceptions. In: ECLAS (ed.). JoLA spring 2007, 30-41. Munich: Callwey.''
* '''''(TG),(IM)''' Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful? in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)''
* ''(FF)Sieverts, Thomas (2003): Cities without cities. An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. English language ed. London: Spon Press.''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* '''''(TG)''' Burckhardt, Lucius (1957): Urban Planning and Democracy in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)
* ''Mario: Hester, Randolph (2012): Evaluating Community Design, Landscape Journal'':
* ''Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press''
* ''(FF)David, Harvey (2003): The Right to the City, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Volume 27, Issue 4, pages 939–941''

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* '''''(TG)''' Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure, Landscape Ecology, vol. 10 no. 4.
* ''Mario: Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014'':
* ''(FF)Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure, Landscape Ecology, vol. 10 no. 4.''

'''D: The Design Process'''
* '''''(TG)''' Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness
* ''Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities'':
* ''(FF)Woodcraft, Saffron, et al.: Design for Social Sustainability: A Framework for Creating Thriving New Communities''
* ''(FF)Salgado, Mariana, et al. (2015): Designing with Immigrants''

'''E: Communication'''
* ''Mario:'(IM)'' Reading the Landscape by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu'':

== Reading Selection Group G ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''

'''* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:'''
* ''The Aarhus Convention'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''
* ''The European landscape convention''
* ''Directive on public access to environmental information'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Directive providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive''
* ''Water Framework Directive''

'''* Landscape Concepts:'''
* ''Concepts of Landscape'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* ''Hester, Randolph (2005): Whose Politics, Landscape Architecture'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''
* ''Gaventa, John: The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts''
* ''Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Furco, Andrew (1996): Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education'' '''(Everybody)'''

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* ''Gafford, Farrah D. (2013): It Was a Real Village: Community Identity Formation Among Black Middle-Class Residents in Pontchartrain Park, Journal of Urban History 39:36'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''
* ''Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''

'''D: The Design Process'''
* ''Hester, Randolph: Democratic Drawing - Techniques for Participatory Design'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Kot, Douglas and Ruggeri, Deni: Westport Case Study''
* ''Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness" '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''

'''E: Communication'''
* ''Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Online decision making with loomio'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''

== Reading Selection Group H ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''

'''Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:'''
* ''(MG) EU"Directive providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment"''
* '''(NR)''' "IFLA-Europe: Landscape Democracy Resolution"
* (ST) Council of Europe - The European Landscape Convention
* '''(RR)'''''European Union (Parliament and Council), ''Water Framework Directive''''
* "(EB) European Charter on Participatory Democracy (under consultation)"

'''Landscape Concepts:'''
* ''(MG) Antrop, Marc; Kühne, Olaf (2015) Concepts of Landscape, in: Landscape Culture - Culturing Landscapes. The Differentiated Construction of Landscapes (Bruns, Kühne, Schönwald, Theile ed.)''
* '''(RR)'''''Jackson, John Brinckerhoff (1980): "By way of conclusion. How to study the landscape" In: The necessity for ruins, and other topics, 113-126. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.'':
* '''(NR)''' Meinig, D. W. (1979): "The Beholding Eye: Ten Versions of the Same Scene"
* (EB) ''Olwig, Kenneth R. (1996): "Recovering the Substantive Nature of Landscape''
* ''(ST) Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
*''(MG) Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press''
* '''(NR)''' Gaventa, John: The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts
* '''(RR)''' Hester, Randolph (2012): Evaluating Community Design, Landscape Journal
* "(EB) David, Harvey (2003): The Right to the City"
* "(ST) Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy - Fairness, The MIT Press"

'''C: Community and Identity'''
*''(MG) Girling, Cynthia (2006): Informing Design Charrettes, The Integrated Assessment Journal
* '''(NR)''' Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy
* '''(RR)'''Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.
*"(EB) Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure"
*"(ST) Spirn, Anne (2005): Restoring Mill Creek"

'''D: The Design Process'''
*''(MG) D’hondt, Frank (2014): Better Cities for Kosovo: Visioning as Participatory Planning Tool,UN-Habitat report
* '''(NR)''' Hester, Randolph: Democratic Drawing - Techniques for Participatory Design
* '''(RR)'''Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities
*"(EB) Hussain, Sofia, et al. (2012): Participatory Design with Marginalized People in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunties Experienced in a Field Study in Cambodia"
*"(ST) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities"

'''E: Communication'''
* ''(MG) Online decision making with loomio
* '''(NR)''' Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands
*"(EB)'Reading the Landscape' by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu"

== Reading Selection Group I ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions: ''
**(SASA)Council of Europe - The European Landscape Convention''
* Landscape Concepts: ''add your selection''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* ''add your selection'':

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* ''AJ: A case study method for Landscape architecture ''

'''D: The Design Process'''
* ''Lucas Passold: Design for Social Sustainability''
* ''AJ: Designe Charrette- a vechicle for consultation or collaboration ''
* ''SS: Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Places in the Making- How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities''

'''E: Communication'''
* ''AJ: Reading the landscape ''
* ''add your selection'':

LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

2016-05-13T14:46:54Z

Verah:

LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

2016-05-13T14:45:17Z

Verah:

File:Das Tempelhofer Feld.jpeg

2016-05-13T14:37:23Z

Verah:

LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2

2016-05-13T12:04:33Z

Verah: /* Rationale: Why have you chosen this case for the landscape and democracy seminar? */

LED Online Seminar 2016 - Working Group B

2016-05-12T18:26:49Z

Verah: /* Your Landscape Democracy Challenges */

'''--> Back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2016|working group overview]]'''

''Dear working group members. This is your group page and you will be completing the template gradually as we move through the seminar. Good luck and enjoy your collaboration!''

== Assignment 1 - Reading and Synthesizing Core Terminology ==
*You can read more details about this assignment [[Assignment_1:_Reading_and_Synthesizing_Core_Terminology|here]]
*Readings are accessible via the [[Resources_and_Literature_Landscape_and_Democracy|resources page]]

=== Step 1 - Define your readings ===
*Please add your readings selection for the terminology exercise before '''25th of April''' on the [[LED Online Seminar 2016 Groups Readings Selection Page|readings selection page]].

=== Step 2 - Concept mapping of core terms ===
*Please add here the link to your concept map on the Cmaps cloud. You will receive an invitation to the cloud per e-mail.

=== Step 3 - Reporting ===
*Please write, as a group, a 250 words reflection on your concept mapping process
*[[Group B Reflections on Readings, LED Seminar 2016|Group reflection on the readings - add them here]]

== Assignment 2 - Your Landscape Symbols ==
*You can read more details about this assignment [[Assignment_2:_Your_Landscape_Symbols|here]]
*There is an own page for this assignment, please click to find further details
*'''go to --> [[LED Seminar 2016 - Landscape Symbols Reflection Group B |Landscape Symbols Reflection Group B]]'''

=== Presentation slides 'Your Landscape Symbols' ===
''After the presentation on '''April 21''' please save your PPT slides to jpgs, upload them and add them to this gallery:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:LED_LS_B_01.JPG|slide 1
File:Serenaindaco assigment2 1.JPG|slide 2
File:Serenaindaco assigment2 2.JPG|slide 3
Image:LED_LS_B_04.JPG|slide 4
Image:LED_LS_B_05.JPG|slide 5
Image:LED_LS_B_06.JPG|slide 6
Image:LED_LS_B_07.JPG|slide 7
Image:LED_LS_B_08.JPG|slide 8
Image:LED_LS_B_09.JPG|slide 9
File:Final Pagenew.jpg
</gallery>

== Assignment 3 - Role Play on Landscape Democracy "movers and shakers" ==
*You can read more details about this assignment [[Assignment_3:_Role_Play_on_Landscape_Democracy_"movers_and_shakers"|here]]

== Assignment 4 - Your Landscape Democracy Challenge ==
*You can read more details about this assignment [[Assignment_4:_Your_Landscape_Democracy_Challenge|here]]
*Each group member will specify a landscape democracy challenge in his/her environment

=== Your Landscape Democracy Challenges ===
* '''[[LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 1|Landscape Democracy Challenge 1]]'''
* '''[[LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 2|Tempelhofer Feld Berlin]]'''
* '''[[LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 3|Landscape Democracy Challenge 3]]'''
* '''[[LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 4|Landscape Democracy Challenge 4]]'''
* '''[[LED 2016 Group B Landscape Democracy Challenge 5|Landscape Democracy Challenge 5]]'''

=== Presentation slides 'Your Landscape Democracy Challenges' ===
''After the presentation on '''May 19''' please save your PPT slides to jpgs, upload them and add them to this gallery:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:group_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:group_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:group_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:group_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:group_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

== Assignment 5 - Your Democratic Change Process ==
*You can read more details about this assignment [[Your Democratic Change Process|here]]
*After documenting and reflecting on your challenges you will continue jointly with one of these challenges and design a democratic change process

=== Your Democratic Change Model ===
* '''[[LED 2016 Group B Democratic Change Process|Your democractic change process]]'''

=== Presentation slides 'Your Democractic Change Process' ===
''After the presentation on '''June 16''' please save your PPT slides to jpgs, upload them and add them to this gallery:''

<gallery caption=" " widths="150px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
Image:group_slide1.JPG|slide 1
Image:group_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:group_slide3.JPG|slide 3
Image:group_slide4.JPG|slide 4
Image:group_slide5.JPG|slide 5
</gallery>

LED Online Seminar 2016 Groups Readings Selection Page

2016-05-02T08:55:28Z

Verah: /* Reading Selection Group B */

'''--> Back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2016|working group overview]]'''

'''--> Back to [[Resources_and_Literature_Landscape_and_Democracy|literature overview]]'''

*''Please add your reading selections per group per topic, minimum: one selection per topic for the [[Assignment_1:_Reading_and_Synthesizing_Core_Terminology|terminology exercise]]''

== Reading Selection Group A ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:

* Landscape Concepts:
* [HD] "Reading the landscape. An appreciation of W.G. Hoskins and J-B. Jackson
* Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful? in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* [HD] Hester, Randolph (1999): A Refrain with a View,
'''C: Community and Identity'''
* PF: Spirn, Anne (2005): Restoring Mill Creek

'''D: The Design Process'''
* Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities

'''E: Communication'''
* ''add your selection''

== Reading Selection Group B ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions: ''add your selection''
* Landscape Concepts: Meinig, D. W. (1979): "The Beholding Eye: Ten Versions of the Same Scene

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press
* VH: Burckhardt, Lucius (1974): Who plans the planning? in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* ''Hester, Randolph (2006). Design of Ecological Democracy'':

'''D: The Design Process'''
* ''add your selection'':

'''E: Communication'''
* VH:''Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands''

== Reading Selection Group C ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* '''Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''':
* DE: The Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
* NT: The European Landscape Convention
* HO: The European Landscape Convention
* '''Landscape Concepts''':
* DE: Meinig, D. W. (1979): "The Beholding Eye: Ten Versions of the Same Scene." In: The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays, edited by D. W. Meinig and John Brinckerhoff Jackson, 33-48. New York: Oxford University Press.
* DE: Sieverts, Thomas (2003): Cities without cities. An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. English language ed. London: Spon Press.
* NT: Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City
* HO: Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful? in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)
* HO: Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City
'''B: Concepts of Participation''':
* DE: Hester, Randolph (1999): A Refrain with a View, UC Berkeley
* NT: Hester, Randolph (2012): Evaluating Community Design, Landscape Journal
* HO: Burckhardt, Lucius (1957): Urban Planning and Democracy in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)
'''C: Community and Identity''':
* DE: Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.
* HO: Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure, Landscape Ecology, vol. 10 no. 4.
'''D: The Design Process''':
* DE: Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness
* DE: Hester, Randolph: Democratic Drawing - Techniques for Participatory Design
* NT: Pritzker Prize winning architect Alejandro Aravena on sustainable design and community involvement in Chile
* HO: Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness
'''E: Communication''':
* DE: Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands

== Reading Selection Group D ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''

'''* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:'''
* [JS] The European Landscape Convention

'''* Landscape Concepts:'''
* [TH] JB Jackson (1980): The necessity for ruins and other topics, 113-126.

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* [TH] Consensus Design by Christopher Day (2002)''
* [JS] Gaventa, John: The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts
* [EN] Landscape and sustainability, theme 2: Social learning, rights and responsibilities

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* [EF] Culture and Changing Landscape Structure

'''D: The Design Process'''
* [EN] Design for social sustainability, a framework for creating a thriving new communities

'''E: Communication'''
* [JS] Reading the Landscape' by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu

== Reading Selection Group E ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:

* ''Kjersti: Presentation of the report Landscape and democracy: prospects by Yves Luginbühl for the Council of Europe''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'The Aarhus Convention':
* ''Gabriela: '':
* ''Sanaz: '': Landscape Democracy Resolution(IFLA-Europe)

* Landscape Concepts:

* ''Kjersti: Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Sieverts, Thomas (2003): Cities without cities. An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt':
* ''Gabriela: '':
* ''Sanaz: '': Lynch, Kevin. (1960): The Image of the City''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design':
* ''Gabriela: '':
* ''Sanaz: '': Gaventa, John: The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts
* ''Kjersti: David, Harvey (2003): The Right to the City + LIFEscape Handbook on Participative Landscape Planning'':

'''C: Community and Identity'''

* ''Kjersti: SEISMIC project, An urban research and innovation project across 10 European countries'':

* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure':
* ''Gabriela: '':
* ''Sanaz: '': Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy, The MIT Press

'''D: The Design Process'''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Pritzker Prize winning architect Alejandro Aravena on sustainable design and community involvement in Chile':
* ''Gabriela: '':
* ''Sanaz: '': Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities
* ''Kjersti: Ruggeri, Deni (2004): Crafting Westport + Hussain, Sofia, et al. (2012): Participatory Design with Marginalized People in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunties Experienced in a Field Study in Cambodia'':

'''E: Communication'''
* ''Joseph: '':
* ''Davide: 'Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands':
* ''Gabriela: '':
* ''Sanaz: '': 'Reading the Landscape' by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu

* ''Kjersti: online decisionmaking with Loomio'':

== Reading Selection Group F ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''

'''Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions''':
* ''Mario: Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive''
'''Landscape Concepts''':
* ''Mario: Cosgrove, Denis. (1985): Prospect, Perspective and the Evolution of the Landscape Idea. In: Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, Vol. 10, No. 1 (1985),pp. 45-62. Published by: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).''
* '''(IM)'' Kucan, Ana (2007). Constructing Landscape Conceptions. In: ECLAS (ed.). JoLA spring 2007, 30-41. Munich: Callwey.''
* '''''(TG),(IM)''' Burckhardt, Lucius (1979): Why is landscape beautiful? in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)''
* ''(FF)Sieverts, Thomas (2003): Cities without cities. An interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. English language ed. London: Spon Press.''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* '''''(TG)''' Burckhardt, Lucius (1957): Urban Planning and Democracy in: Fezer/Schmitz (Eds.) Rethinking Man-made Environments (2012)
* ''Mario: Hester, Randolph (2012): Evaluating Community Design, Landscape Journal'':
* ''Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press''
* ''(FF)David, Harvey (2003): The Right to the City, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Volume 27, Issue 4, pages 939–941''

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* '''''(TG)''' Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure, Landscape Ecology, vol. 10 no. 4.
* ''Mario: Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014'':
* ''(FF)Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure, Landscape Ecology, vol. 10 no. 4.''

'''D: The Design Process'''
* '''''(TG)''' Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness
* ''Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities'':
* ''(FF)Woodcraft, Saffron, et al.: Design for Social Sustainability: A Framework for Creating Thriving New Communities''
* ''(FF)Salgado, Mariana, et al. (2015): Designing with Immigrants''

'''E: Communication'''
* ''Mario:'(IM)'' Reading the Landscape by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu'':

== Reading Selection Group G ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''

'''* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:'''
* ''The Aarhus Convention'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''
* ''The European landscape convention''
* ''Directive on public access to environmental information'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Directive providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive''
* ''Water Framework Directive''

'''* Landscape Concepts:'''
* ''Concepts of Landscape'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* ''Hester, Randolph (2005): Whose Politics, Landscape Architecture'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''
* ''Gaventa, John: The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts''
* ''Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Furco, Andrew (1996): Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education'' '''(Everybody)'''

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* ''Gafford, Farrah D. (2013): It Was a Real Village: Community Identity Formation Among Black Middle-Class Residents in Pontchartrain Park, Journal of Urban History 39:36'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''
* ''Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''

'''D: The Design Process'''
* ''Hester, Randolph: Democratic Drawing - Techniques for Participatory Design'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Kot, Douglas and Ruggeri, Deni: Westport Case Study''
* ''Hester, Randolph: Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sustainable Happiness" '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''

'''E: Communication'''
* ''Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands'' '''(Tonje Cecilie Stordalen)'''
* ''Online decision making with loomio'' '''(Guido Maria Amorati)'''

== Reading Selection Group H ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''

'''Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions:'''
* ''(MG) EU"Directive providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment"''
* '''(NR)''' "IFLA-Europe: Landscape Democracy Resolution"
* (ST) Council of Europe - The European Landscape Convention
* '''(RR)'''''European Union (Parliament and Council), ''Water Framework Directive''''
* "(EB) European Charter on Participatory Democracy (under consultation)"

'''Landscape Concepts:'''
* ''(MG) Antrop, Marc; Kühne, Olaf (2015) Concepts of Landscape, in: Landscape Culture - Culturing Landscapes. The Differentiated Construction of Landscapes (Bruns, Kühne, Schönwald, Theile ed.)''
* '''(RR)'''''Jackson, John Brinckerhoff (1980): "By way of conclusion. How to study the landscape" In: The necessity for ruins, and other topics, 113-126. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.'':
* '''(NR)''' Meinig, D. W. (1979): "The Beholding Eye: Ten Versions of the Same Scene"
* (EB) ''Olwig, Kenneth R. (1996): "Recovering the Substantive Nature of Landscape''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
*''(MG) Day, Christopher (2002): Consensus Design, Architectural Press''
* '''(NR)''' Gaventa, John: The Powerful, the Powerless, and the Experts
* '''(RR)''' Hester, Randolph (2012): Evaluating Community Design, Landscape Journal
* "(EB) David, Harvey (2003): The Right to the City"

'''C: Community and Identity'''
*''(MG) Girling, Cynthia (2006): Informing Design Charrettes, The Integrated Assessment Journal
* '''(NR)''' Hester, Randolph (2006): Design for Ecological Democracy
* '''(RR)'''Welk Von Mossner, Alexa (2014): Cinematic Landscapes, In: Topos, No. 88, 2014.
*"(EB) Nassauer, Joan Iverson (1995): Culture and Changing Landscape Structure"

'''D: The Design Process'''
*''(MG) D’hondt, Frank (2014): Better Cities for Kosovo: Visioning as Participatory Planning Tool,UN-Habitat report
* '''(NR)''' Hester, Randolph: Democratic Drawing - Techniques for Participatory Design
* '''(RR)'''Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2013): Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities
*"(EB) Hussain, Sofia, et al. (2012): Participatory Design with Marginalized People in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunties Experienced in a Field Study in Cambodia"

'''E: Communication'''
* ''(MG) Online decision making with loomio
* '''(NR)''' Storytelling example from the Scottish Islands
*"(EB)'Reading the Landscape' by Simon Bell, EMU Tartu"

== Reading Selection Group I ==
'''A: Landscape and Democracy - Mapping the Terrain'''
* Policy frameworks, laws and resolutions: ''
**(ST)Council of Europe - The European Landscape Convention''
* Landscape Concepts: ''add your selection''

'''B: Concepts of Participation'''
* ''add your selection'':

'''C: Community and Identity'''
* ''AJ: A case study method for Landscape architecture ''

'''D: The Design Process'''
* ''LP: Design for Social Sustainability''
* ''AJ: Designe Charrette- a vechicle for consultation or collaboration ''
* ''SS: Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Places in the Making- How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities''

'''E: Communication'''
* ''AJ: Reading the landscape ''
* ''add your selection'':

'Mover and Shaker' Selection List

2016-04-28T15:03:56Z

Verah: /* Julian Petrin et al., Hamburg (nexthamburg, German only) */

'''Back to ---> [[Assignment_3:_Role_Play_on_Landscape_Democracy_"movers_and_shakers"|Assignment 3]]'''

* Please add your name to the 'Mover and Shaker' you would like to role play
* In order to achieve some diversity each 'Mover and Shaker' should be selected by not more than three participants

== Randy Hester (UC Berkeley, Manteo, Big Wild, The Spoonbill project) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Lawrence (Larry) Halprin, (The RSVP cycle, Levi’s Plaza and Headquarters) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Karl Linn (UC Berkeley, Community Gardens) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Mark Francis (Village homes) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Anne Spirn (Mill Creek Project) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Ken Reardon (University of Memphis, the East Saint Louis Project) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Jan Gehl (‘Life between buildings’, how to study public life) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Henry Sanoff (Planning Games) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Ralph Erskine (Byker Redevelopment) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Jeff Hou (Insurgent Urbanism, International district in Seattle) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Walter Hood (UC Berkeley, Lafayette Park Oakland, CA) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name
== Samuel Mockbee (The Rural Studio) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== James Rojas (place-it) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== ReBar (Parking day/parklets) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Giancarlo De Carlo (Team 10, Legitimizing architecture) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Paula Horrigan (Cornell University; Rust to Green project) ==
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

== Christopher Alexander (The Oregon Experiment, Pattern Language) ==
* Daniela Ellis
* add your name
* add your name

== Julian Petrin et al., Hamburg (nexthamburg, German only) ==
[http://www.nexthamburg.de/ Next Hamburg]

* Vera Hausmanns
* add your name
* add your name

== Leonie Sandercock (University of British Columbia, Collingwood Neighbourhood House) ==
* Tonje Cecilie Stordalen
* add your name
* add your name

== Klaus Overmeyer (Urban Catalyst Studio) ==
[http://www.urbancatalyst-studio.de/en/news.html Urban Catalyst]
* add your name
* add your name
* add your name

LED Online Seminar 2016 Groups Readings Selection Page

2016-04-25T17:27:20Z

Verah: /* Reading Selection Group B */

LED Online Seminar 2016 Groups Readings Selection Page

2016-04-25T10:31:45Z

Verah: /* Reading Selection Group B */

LED Online Seminar 2016 Groups Readings Selection Page

2016-04-25T10:30:45Z

Verah: /* Reading Selection Group B */

LED Seminar 2016 - Landscape Symbols Reflection Group B

2016-04-21T10:14:45Z

Verah: /* Representations and analytical drawings */

'''--> [[LED_Online_Seminar_2016_-_Working_Group_B|Back to your group page]]'''

== Landscape Symbol 1- Fields in Ås/Plantasjen, Mia Thun ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:groupI_slide1.JPG|Fields in Ås
Image:groupI_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupI_slide3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

=== Reflections ===
''Please write a 250 words text reflecting on the following questions, you can also take ideas from your group members into account''
*How and why did the symbols you identify appear in your landscape?
*Did their meaning change along with socio-political, economic, environmental or cultural changes in your region, or country?
*What do these symbols mean to you today? Are they meaningful to more than just one cultural group? Are they shared across cultures?

''add your text here''

== Landscape Symbol 2- Bologna's Symbols, Serena Indaco ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Bologna's symbols.jpg|Bologna's symbols
Image:groupI_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupI_slide3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

=== Reflections ===

In these pictures I have highlight the symbols leaving them colored while the background is black and white.

Arcades: Bologna is made by arcades in fact in the town there are nearly 44 km! This type of construction permit to all the visitors of the city to go everywhere without the problem of the weather. In medieval age they were built to increase the areas of the apartments leaving free the ground level. Today they appear as a characteristic of the streets. Walking under arcades give to the walker a sensation of protection from the car’s road but also give to him the possibility to have a glimpse to what is happening in the near road while his main attention is focused on the shops that are present in a great number in the other side. The arcades are diffused in the entire town, but are particularly present in the center. This network give sensations of continuity, identity and belonging to this particular visual landscape. Therefore, today, they appears useful but have an aesthetic value, too.

Representation of the Madonna: Under the Bologna’s arcades, there are a great number of Virgin Mary’s representations made with different technique and showing various scenes of her life. These underline the devotion of Bologna’s inhabitants that asked to these Madonnas to benedict their everyday life. Today people walk without raise up their heads and so they don’t pay attention to these artistic works, some of them wonderful, that make precious the walls of buildings. They are symbols referred to a Christian background but, also, there are important for their artistic and historical meaning.

Dalla’s sculpture: Lucio Dalla was a very famous Italian musician that died some years ago. He was born in Bologna and he related his life and his musical work with this town. One month ago, the municipality had decided to place , for a short period, a bronze Dalla’s sculpture in a small square near his house. In these days many tourist, inhabitants want to see this art craft especially to take a selfie with it. Therefore, there is always a small crowd of people near the sculpture. Usually people want to take a picture with objects that are representative of a town, but seldom they know the history or simply the name of what it is represented. In this case, people with different background are collected by their love for music and wanted a picture as the fans desire the sign of their idol.

== Landscape Symbol 3-Documenta 6 Kassel, Vera Hausmanns ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Art Installation "Rahmenbau" part of the documenta 6.jpeg|Art Installation "Rahmenbau" part of the documenta 6
Image:Analytical Sketch of the meaning.jpeg|Analytical Sketch of the meaning
Image:groupI_slide3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

This art installation is a work of art of the documenta. The documenta is an art exhibition of modern art, which takes place each seven years at Kassel. It is called "Rahmenbau" or "Landschaft im Dia", what means in English something like framing or landscape in a slide. It is built 1977 by a group of architects and artists on the occasion of the documenta 6. In former times on this place has been a building called "Auetor". The "Auetor" should depict a window to the landscape. When a big theater has been built at this place the "Auetor" is torn off. After World War II the view to the landscape has been free again. So they built this art installation for the documenta to remember on the "Auetor" and made a new window to the landscape possible.

I think, this work of art has a historical background. I am sure, that most of the people that visited it didn't know about this. They only see the art installation of the documenta 6. So I would like to say it has changed his meaning from a modern "reconstruction" of the "Auetor" to a work of art of the documenta 6. I would classify it as a change of meaning in a cultural way. And I think this meaning concern only Kassel.

Inside the frame you can see all the important parts that represent Kassel. In the front of the view, you can see the "Orangerie" which show you the history of the town. In the background you can see a smoke stack which represents the industry and in the front of the frame you see the "Friedrichsplatz" with all the people. For me these things are the parts that represent Kassel. I am not sure if this is only a very personal interpretation or if other people are thinking the same. In his properties as a work of art representing the documenta 6 as the exhibition of modern art it might have other meanings to other cultures and other people.

== Landscape Symbol 4- St. Petersburg, Russia Julia Sevrugova ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Symbols in the landscape of Saint Petersburg, Russia.jpg|Symbols in the landscape of Saint Petersburg, Russia
File:SPb 2.jpg|slide 2
File:SPb 3.jpg|slide 3
</gallery>

Color itself could be a significant symbol of Saint Petersburg. Since the foundation of the city, special attention has been paid to the color range used when designing facades of the buildings. The standards have been changing throughout the centuries, but some patterns still stay the same. Despite the fashion trends, warm colors have always dominated. This tendency can be explained quite easily. Saint Petersburg is a Nordic city, and it has rather cool and damp climate. Gloomy skies, cold weather and lack of the sunlight during the wintertime affect people both on physiological and psychological levels. Yellow, orange and light red colors of the buildings and street lighting imitate the sunshine and help to mitigate the negative effects of Nordic climate. Indirectly, this also influences different spheres of social life.

== Landscape Symbol 5- Bangladesh, Md Abdulla Al-Mamun ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:LS 02.jpg|Landscape symbol in Rajshahi, Bangladdesh
Image:Landscape symbols_02.jpg
|slide 2
Image:groupI_slide3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

=== Reflections ===
Climate, location and soil formation of the country allows agriculture as one of the important sector in the economy of Bangladesh. Similarly a large number of population are directly involved in this sector. According to the World Bank, the total arable land in Bangladesh is 61.2 percent of the total land area. Since, the specific landscape or the community where I grownup has a special contribution in agricultural sector, I have choose to explore it as a landscape symbol for this seminar.

‘Rajshahi’ is the north of Bangladesh and the climate is classified as tropical, also known as warmer city of the country. Therefore, the particular climate and soil formation permits to grow a mango trees. Almost every house has a single tree of it and outside of the town a huge horizon is covered by the mango gardens. At the same time is a pleasant green all over the year and large agro industry for a specific season. The amount of the production is much high that is exported to abroad after satisfying the need of the country.

The whole process, from the field to the market and till to the consumer, a large number of people involved. The farmers are the mail persons who confirm the supply. It’s an open market for all kind of people who are interested to buy. The two centered picture shows the circumstances of this process. Therefore, it has a large impact on the local economy. Likewise, the mango-based trade and business has changed the rural economic scenario of the region as a whole.

To praise the situation and as local pride in very often the representation can be seen as a form of sculpture or in printing media.

== Group reflection ==

''Please add a summary of your group reflection here''

[[Category:Landscape Symbols Group Reflection 2016]]

LED Seminar 2016 - Landscape Symbols Reflection Group B

2016-04-21T10:13:36Z

Verah: /* Representations and analytical drawings */

'''--> [[LED_Online_Seminar_2016_-_Working_Group_B|Back to your group page]]'''

== Landscape Symbol 1- Fields in Ås/Plantasjen, Mia Thun ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:groupI_slide1.JPG|Fields in Ås
Image:groupI_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupI_slide3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

=== Reflections ===
''Please write a 250 words text reflecting on the following questions, you can also take ideas from your group members into account''
*How and why did the symbols you identify appear in your landscape?
*Did their meaning change along with socio-political, economic, environmental or cultural changes in your region, or country?
*What do these symbols mean to you today? Are they meaningful to more than just one cultural group? Are they shared across cultures?

''add your text here''

== Landscape Symbol 2- Bologna's Symbols, Serena Indaco ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Bologna's symbols.jpg|Bologna's symbols
Image:groupI_slide2.JPG|slide 2
Image:groupI_slide3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

=== Reflections ===

In these pictures I have highlight the symbols leaving them colored while the background is black and white.

Arcades: Bologna is made by arcades in fact in the town there are nearly 44 km! This type of construction permit to all the visitors of the city to go everywhere without the problem of the weather. In medieval age they were built to increase the areas of the apartments leaving free the ground level. Today they appear as a characteristic of the streets. Walking under arcades give to the walker a sensation of protection from the car’s road but also give to him the possibility to have a glimpse to what is happening in the near road while his main attention is focused on the shops that are present in a great number in the other side. The arcades are diffused in the entire town, but are particularly present in the center. This network give sensations of continuity, identity and belonging to this particular visual landscape. Therefore, today, they appears useful but have an aesthetic value, too.

Representation of the Madonna: Under the Bologna’s arcades, there are a great number of Virgin Mary’s representations made with different technique and showing various scenes of her life. These underline the devotion of Bologna’s inhabitants that asked to these Madonnas to benedict their everyday life. Today people walk without raise up their heads and so they don’t pay attention to these artistic works, some of them wonderful, that make precious the walls of buildings. They are symbols referred to a Christian background but, also, there are important for their artistic and historical meaning.

Dalla’s sculpture: Lucio Dalla was a very famous Italian musician that died some years ago. He was born in Bologna and he related his life and his musical work with this town. One month ago, the municipality had decided to place , for a short period, a bronze Dalla’s sculpture in a small square near his house. In these days many tourist, inhabitants want to see this art craft especially to take a selfie with it. Therefore, there is always a small crowd of people near the sculpture. Usually people want to take a picture with objects that are representative of a town, but seldom they know the history or simply the name of what it is represented. In this case, people with different background are collected by their love for music and wanted a picture as the fans desire the sign of their idol.

== Landscape Symbol 3-Documenta 6 Kassel, Vera Hausmanns ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Art Installation "Rahmenbau" part of the documenta 6.jpeg|Art Installation "Rahmenbau" part of the documenta 6
Image:Analytical Sketch of the meaning.jpeg
Image:groupI_slide3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

This art installation is a work of art of the documenta. The documenta is an art exhibition of modern art, which takes place each seven years at Kassel. It is called "Rahmenbau" or "Landschaft im Dia", what means in English something like framing or landscape in a slide. It is built 1977 by a group of architects and artists on the occasion of the documenta 6. In former times on this place has been a building called "Auetor". The "Auetor" should depict a window to the landscape. When a big theater has been built at this place the "Auetor" is torn off. After World War II the view to the landscape has been free again. So they built this art installation for the documenta to remember on the "Auetor" and made a new window to the landscape possible.

I think, this work of art has a historical background. I am sure, that most of the people that visited it didn't know about this. They only see the art installation of the documenta 6. So I would like to say it has changed his meaning from a modern "reconstruction" of the "Auetor" to a work of art of the documenta 6. I would classify it as a chnange of meaning in a cultural way. And I think this meaning concern only Kassel.

Inside the frame you can see all the important parts that represent Kassel. In the front of the view, you can see the "Orangerie" which show you the history of the town. In the background you can see a smoke stack which represents the industry and in the front of the frame you see the "Friedrichsplatz" with all the people. For me these things are the parts that represent Kassel. I am not sure if this is only a very personal interpretation or if other people are thinking the same. In his properties as a work of art representing the documenta 6 as the exhibition of modern art it might have other meanings to other cultures and other people.

== Landscape Symbol 4- St. Petersburg, Russia Julia Sevrugova ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:Symbols in the landscape of Saint Petersburg, Russia.jpg|Symbols in the landscape of Saint Petersburg, Russia
File:SPb 2.jpg|slide 2
File:SPb 3.jpg|slide 3
</gallery>

Color itself could be a significant symbol of Saint Petersburg. Since the foundation of the city, special attention has been paid to the color range used when designing facades of the buildings. The standards have been changing throughout the centuries, but some patterns still stay the same. Despite the fashion trends, warm colors have always dominated. This tendency can be explained quite easily. Saint Petersburg is a Nordic city, and it has rather cool and damp climate. Gloomy skies, cold weather and lack of the sunlight during the wintertime affect people both on physiological and psychological levels. Yellow, orange and light red colors of the buildings and street lighting imitate the sunshine and help to mitigate the negative effects of Nordic climate. Indirectly, this also influences different spheres of social life.

== Landscape Symbol 5- Bangladesh, Md Abdulla Al-Mamun ==

=== Representations and analytical drawings ===
''in addition to your initial visual please add two further analytical drawings of your symbol''
<gallery caption=" " widths="250px" heights="150px" perrow="3">
Image:LS 02.jpg|Landscape symbol in Rajshahi, Bangladdesh
Image:Landscape symbols_02.jpg
|slide 2
Image:groupI_slide3.JPG|slide 3
</gallery>

=== Reflections ===
Climate, location and soil formation of the country allows agriculture as one of the important sector in the economy of Bangladesh. Similarly a large number of population are directly involved in this sector. According to the World Bank, the total arable land in Bangladesh is 61.2 percent of the total land area. Since, the specific landscape or the community where I grownup has a special contribution in agricultural sector, I have choose to explore it as a landscape symbol for this seminar.

‘Rajshahi’ is the north of Bangladesh and the climate is classified as tropical, also known as warmer city of the country. Therefore, the particular climate and soil formation permits to grow a mango trees. Almost every house has a single tree of it and outside of the town a huge horizon is covered by the mango gardens. At the same time is a pleasant green all over the year and large agro industry for a specific season. The amount of the production is much high that is exported to abroad after satisfying the need of the country.

The whole process, from the field to the market and till to the consumer, a large number of people involved. The farmers are the mail persons who confirm the supply. It’s an open market for all kind of people who are interested to buy. The two centered picture shows the circumstances of this process. Therefore, it has a large impact on the local economy. Likewise, the mango-based trade and business has changed the rural economic scenario of the region as a whole.

To praise the situation and as local pride in very often the representation can be seen as a form of sculpture or in printing media.

== Group reflection ==

''Please add a summary of your group reflection here''

[[Category:Landscape Symbols Group Reflection 2016]]

File:Analytical Sketch of the meaning.jpeg

2016-04-17T15:37:00Z

Verah:

LED Seminar 2016 - Landscape Symbols Reflection Group B

2016-04-14T15:55:32Z

Verah: /* Reflections */

LED Seminar 2016 - Landscape Symbols Reflection Group B

2016-04-14T15:54:14Z

Verah: /* Reflections */

File:My selfie place.jpeg

2016-04-07T14:16:57Z

Verah:

File:Art Installation "Rahmenbau" part of the documenta 6.jpeg

2016-04-05T11:22:55Z

Verah: This art installation is a work of art of the documenta. The documenta is an art exhibition of modern art, which takes place each seven years at Kassel. Inside the frame you can see all the important parts that represent Kassel. In the front of the vie...

This art installation is a work of art of the documenta. The documenta is an art exhibition of modern art, which takes place each seven years at Kassel. Inside the frame you can see all the important parts that represent Kassel. In the front of the view, you can see the "Orangerie" which show you the history of the town. In the background you can see a smoke stack which represent the industry and in the front of the frame you see the "Friedrichsplatz" with all the people.