Ledwiki - User contributions [en]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T16:34:31Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* The Scene in your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the fact that the playgrounds & green spaces in Freising are not suitable enough in the matter of people's needs. Firstly playgrounds are there but they don't show any variety and we also find them serious and strict, instead of motivating children to find creative ways of playing they provide a limited amount of directions to play and secondly, regarding the recreational areas for adults, they are very conservative and outdated, no outdoor training's parks (calisthenics) '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:GrandpaGunter.jpeg|''The story begins''
File:Challengeteam7.jpg|''Challenge structure''
File:Wildwest.jpeg|''''
File:Tumbleweed.jpeg|''''
File:Freisingpakr.jpg|''''

</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:GrandpaGunter.jpeg|''The story begins''
</gallery>
*'' The main actors of the story are from kids, students, senior citizens, differently able people, different ethnicity and also from authority. There are some direct and indirect relationships between them. The main character of the story is Gunter Roeder, who is 72 years old retired engineer. In a way, Mr. Roeder meets with shopkeeper Ataturk Ganja in the nearby grocery store and two students in the park. The grandchildren of Mr. Roeder are also involved in the story. The person meets with other persons from different groups and has realized similar feelings of the less motivating playgrounds, parks, and green spaces in the community. Altogether they initiated some surveys and workshops to fix the exact landscape democracy challenge of the community and to address the common solutions for all.
''

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:Method 1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:Method 2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:Method 3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>
*'' The main character of the story, Mr. Roeder went out to do food grocery from his neighboring store and meet shopkeeper, Mr. Ganja. From informal chitchat with Mr. Ganja, he found the same pale feelings about his community's park and green spaces. He found out similar in thoughts when he meets with two students in the park. His thoughts also become more attached when he got the same grey feelings from his grandchildren.''

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==

*''They fitted very well. The purpose of workshops, surveys and "city recon" helped the actors interact better with each other and their landscape, made them more aware about their needs and power of implementing them, the weaker voices got their chance to speak up and share their ideas, willingly to take part in the community design process and feel more attached to their neighborhoods.''
*'' The tools help to minimize the conflict of opinion variation from individuals. Additionally, those tools lead to making a common ground of problems and solutions.''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Output-Reflection.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T16:29:31Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Reflect on your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the fact that the playgrounds & green spaces in Freising are not suitable enough in the matter of people's needs. Firstly playgrounds are there but they don't show any variety and we also find them serious and strict, instead of motivating children to find creative ways of playing they provide a limited amount of directions to play and secondly, regarding the recreational areas for adults, they are very conservative and outdated, no outdoor training's parks (calisthenics) '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Challengeteam7.jpg|''Challenge structure''
File:Wildwest.jpeg|''''
File:Tumbleweed.jpeg|''''
File:Freisingpakr.jpg|''''

</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:GrandpaGunter.jpeg|''The story begins''
</gallery>
*'' The main actors of the story are from kids, students, senior citizens, differently able people, different ethnicity and also from authority. There are some direct and indirect relationships between them. The main character of the story is Gunter Roeder, who is 72 years old retired engineer. In a way, Mr. Roeder meets with shopkeeper Ataturk Ganja in the nearby grocery store and two students in the park. The grandchildren of Mr. Roeder are also involved in the story. The person meets with other persons from different groups and has realized similar feelings of the less motivating playgrounds, parks, and green spaces in the community. Altogether they initiated some surveys and workshops to fix the exact landscape democracy challenge of the community and to address the common solutions for all.
''

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:Method 1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:Method 2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:Method 3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>
*'' The main character of the story, Mr. Roeder went out to do food grocery from his neighboring store and meet shopkeeper, Mr. Ganja. From informal chitchat with Mr. Ganja, he found the same pale feelings about his community's park and green spaces. He found out similar in thoughts when he meets with two students in the park. His thoughts also become more attached when he got the same grey feelings from his grandchildren.''

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==

*''They fitted very well. The purpose of workshops, surveys and "city recon" helped the actors interact better with each other and their landscape, made them more aware about their needs and power of implementing them, the weaker voices got their chance to speak up and share their ideas, willingly to take part in the community design process and feel more attached to their neighborhoods.''
*'' The tools help to minimize the conflict of opinion variation from individuals. Additionally, those tools lead to making a common ground of problems and solutions.''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Output-Reflection.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T15:45:46Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Reflect on your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the fact that the playgrounds & green spaces in Freising are not suitable enough in the matter of people's needs. Firstly playgrounds are there but they don't show any variety and we also find them serious and strict, instead of motivating children to find creative ways of playing they provide a limited amount of directions to play and secondly, regarding the recreational areas for adults, they are very conservative and outdated, no outdoor training's parks (calisthenics) '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Challengeteam7.jpg|''Challenge structure''
File:Wildwest.jpeg|''''
File:Tumbleweed.jpeg|''''
File:Freisingpakr.jpg|''''

</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:GrandpaGunter.jpeg|''The story begins''
</gallery>
*'' The main actors of the story are from kids, students, senior citizens, differently able people, different ethnicity and also from authority. There are some direct and indirect relationships between them. The main character of the story is Gunter Roeder, who is 72 years old retired engineer. In a way, Mr. Roeder meets with shopkeeper Ataturk Ganja in the nearby grocery store and two students in the park. The nephews of Mr. Roeder are also involved in the story. The person meets with other persons from different groups and has realized similar feelings of the less motivating playgrounds, parks, and green spaces in the community. Altogether they initiated some surveys and workshops to fix the exact landscape democracy challenge of the community and to address the common solutions for all.
''

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:Method 1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:Method 2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:Method 3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''They fitted very well. The purpose of workshops, surveys and "city recon" helped the actors interact better with each other and their landscape, made them more aware about their needs and power of implementing them, the weaker voices got their chance to speak up and share their ideas.''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Output-Reflection.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

File:Pizzateam7.jpg

2020-05-19T15:36:52Z

Bogdan.draghici:

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T15:33:34Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* The Actors in your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the fact that the playgrounds & green spaces in Freising are not suitable enough in the matter of people's needs. Firstly playgrounds are there but they don't show any variety and we also find them serious and strict, instead of motivating children to find creative ways of playing they provide a limited amount of directions to play and secondly, regarding the recreational areas for adults, they are very conservative and outdated, no outdoor training's parks (calisthenics) '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Challengeteam7.jpg|''Challenge structure''
File:Wildwest.jpeg|''''
File:Tumbleweed.jpeg|''''
File:Freisingpakr.jpg|''''

</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:GrandpaGunter.jpeg|''The story begins''
</gallery>
*'' The main actors of the story are from kids, students, senior citizens, differently able people, different ethnicity and also from authority. There are some direct and indirect relationships between them. The main character of the story is Gunter Roeder, who is 72 years old retired engineer. The person meets with other persons from different groups and has realized similar feelings of the less motivating playgrounds. In a way, Mr. Roeder meets with shopkeeper Ataturk Ganja in the nearby grocery store and two students in the park.
''

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:Method 1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_refelction1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T15:33:01Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* The Actors in your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the fact that the playgrounds & green spaces in Freising are not suitable enough in the matter of people's needs. Firstly playgrounds are there but they don't show any variety and we also find them serious and strict, instead of motivating children to find creative ways of playing they provide a limited amount of directions to play and secondly, regarding the recreational areas for adults, they are very conservative and outdated, no outdoor training's parks (calisthenics) '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Challengeteam7.jpg|''Challenge structure''
File:Wildwest.jpeg|''''
File:Tumbleweed.jpeg|''''
File:Freisingpakr.jpg|''''

</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:GrandpaGunter.jpeg|''The story begins''
</gallery>
*'' The main actors of the story are from kids, students, senior citizens, differently able people, different ethnicity and also from authority. There are some direct and indirect relationships between them. The main character of the story is Gunter Roeder, who is 72 years old retired engineer. The person meets with other persons from different groups and has realized similar feelings of the less motivating playgrounds. In a way, Mr. Roeder meets with shopkeeper Ataturk Ganja in the nearby grocery store and two students in the park.
''

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:Method 1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_refelction1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

File:GrandpaGunter.jpeg

2020-05-19T15:32:33Z

Bogdan.draghici:

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T15:29:20Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* The Scene in your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the fact that the playgrounds & green spaces in Freising are not suitable enough in the matter of people's needs. Firstly playgrounds are there but they don't show any variety and we also find them serious and strict, instead of motivating children to find creative ways of playing they provide a limited amount of directions to play and secondly, regarding the recreational areas for adults, they are very conservative and outdated, no outdoor training's parks (calisthenics) '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Challengeteam7.jpg|''Challenge structure''
File:Wildwest.jpeg|''''
File:Tumbleweed.jpeg|''''
File:Freisingpakr.jpg|''''

</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_actors1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>
*'' The main actors of the story are from kids, students, senior citizens, differently able people, different ethnicity and also from authority. There are some direct and indirect relationships between them. The main character of the story is Gunter Roeder, who is 72 years old retired engineer. The person meets with other persons from different groups and has realized similar feelings of the less motivating playgrounds. In a way, Mr. Roeder meets with shopkeeper Ataturk Ganja in the nearby grocery store and two students in the park.
''

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:yourcase_story1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_refelction1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

File:Challengeteam7.jpg

2020-05-19T15:28:09Z

Bogdan.draghici:

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T15:26:41Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* The Scene in your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the fact that the playgrounds & green spaces in Freising are not suitable enough in the matter of people's needs. Firstly playgrounds are there but they don't show any variety and we also find them serious and strict, instead of motivating children to find creative ways of playing they provide a limited amount of directions to play and secondly, regarding the recreational areas for adults, they are very conservative and outdated, no outdoor training's parks (calisthenics) '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Wildwest.jpeg|''add a caption''
File:Tumbleweed.jpeg|''add a caption''
File:Freisingpakr.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_actors1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>
*'' The main actors of the story are from kids, students, senior citizens, differently able people, different ethnicity and also from authority. There are some direct and indirect relationships between them. The main character of the story is Gunter Roeder, who is 72 years old retired engineer. The person meets with other persons from different groups and has realized similar feelings of the less motivating playgrounds.''

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:yourcase_story1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_refelction1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

File:Freisingpakr.jpg

2020-05-19T15:26:30Z

Bogdan.draghici:

File:Tumbleweed.jpeg

2020-05-19T15:25:50Z

Bogdan.draghici:

File:Wildwest.jpeg

2020-05-19T15:25:10Z

Bogdan.draghici:

File:Tumbleweed.png

2020-05-19T15:22:53Z

Bogdan.draghici:

File:Wildwestpark.png

2020-05-19T15:21:46Z

Bogdan.draghici:

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T15:18:10Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* The Scene in your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the fact that the playgrounds & green spaces in Freising are not suitable enough in the matter of people's needs. Firstly playgrounds are there but they don't show any variety and we also find them serious and strict, instead of motivating children to find creative ways of playing they provide a limited amount of directions to play and secondly, regarding the recreational areas for adults, they are very conservative and outdated, no outdoor training's parks (calisthenics) '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_scene1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_actors1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:yourcase_story1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_refelction1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T15:04:29Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* The Scene in your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe your landscape democracy challenge. What is the physical scene, specific description of the landscape? What are the socio-economic and political characteristics of place? Are there any important contextual elements?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the fact that the playgrounds & green spaces in Freising are not suitable enough in the matter of people's needs. Firstly playgrounds are there but they don't show any variety and we also find them serious and strict, instead of motivating children to find creative ways of playing they provide a limited amount of directions to play and secondly regarding the recreational areas for adults, they are very conservative '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_scene1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_actors1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:yourcase_story1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_refelction1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T14:32:30Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* The Scene in your Story of Analysis */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe your landscape democracy challenge. What is the physical scene, specific description of the landscape? What are the socio-economic and political characteristics of place? Are there any important contextual elements?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''As it will be seen below, our landscape democracy challenge is the the seriousness of green spaces in Freising, and for a concrete example would be the playgrounds '

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_scene1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_actors1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:yourcase_story1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_refelction1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-05-19T14:15:23Z

Bogdan.draghici:

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising ''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map: 48.40281044911876,11.744041442871094~Freising; 48.35446667842327,11.781120300292969~Munich Airport
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
== The Scene in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe your landscape democracy challenge. What is the physical scene, specific description of the landscape? What are the socio-economic and political characteristics of place? Are there any important contextual elements?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_scene1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== The Actors in your Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the characters and their role in the story. Are they major or minor characters? Are there any key relationships that need to be defined?''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_actors1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== The Story of Analysis ==
*''Describe the plot of the story and how it plays out.''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''
*''add as many additional images as you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="4">
File:yourcase_story1.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story2.jpg|''add a caption''
File:yourcase_story3.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

== Reflect on your Story of Analysis ==
*''How did the tools you chose for landscape analysis fit your community? Reflect on the questions: What did you carry? Why did you carry? How did you carry? What remains after you've left? (150 words)''
*''add the corresponding visual from your presentation to the image gallery below''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:yourcase_refelction1.jpg|''add a caption''
</gallery>

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T21:03:44Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Groups of actors and stakeholders present here */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, Ethnic groups, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T21:00:25Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T21:00:10Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

<nowiki> Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:59:57Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here</nowiki>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:57:39Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:57:07Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:56:04Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Freising - Munich Airport community */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north (Domberg and Weihenstephaner Berg)
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.

We also received some very useful feedback on how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning''
From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:39:47Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Theory reflection */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leaves too much to the member states. There also seems to be not in control on what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about how public participants have access to the general landscape information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:37:27Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Process Reflection */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

*''Council of Europe''
According to the European Landscape Convention, the public's active participation is prior to protect the heritage value of the landscape. Additionally, the mutuality between local inhabitants and the professionals is also key factors for identifying and assessing landscape features.

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society. And we also realized this aspect that the landscape related issues are not affecting just one part of the community/society but the hole and that there should be a much better communication between all actors.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:33:46Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Process Reflection */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection. The other way around, the farmers and environmental protection share the same space, but have other interests and goals.

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

All in all the work done until now by our team, gave us a better understanding of our position in the community and our power to change and influence it. And for sure it made us realize that as active participants in the community or given the chance to some of us becoming specialists, elected representatives or technical staff of local, regional and national authorities, we have a great responsibility towards the present and future well-being of the hole society.

[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:16:00Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* References */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:15:26Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:15:06Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:14:49Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.''

The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:14:26Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
''Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.''

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:09:59Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders present here ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:09:45Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Phase A: Mapping your Community */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:06:48Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Freising community */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising - Munich Airport community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:06:02Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Location and scope */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:05:25Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Freising community */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:04:21Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:03:53Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''
*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)''
*''Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry''
*''Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T20:03:13Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''
*''Key actors :Individuals, Authorities, Heath care system, Airport, Communication (mobility)
Primary groups: Farmers, Environment protection, Recreation, Education, Environmental protection associations, Commerce, Industry
Secondary groups: Churches, Cultural groups, Elders, People with disabilities, Energy, Investors & Developers, Tourism''
<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T19:47:47Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''
The tourism, agriculture, authority and recycling communities have in common environmental protection

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-28T19:26:09Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Relationships between your actors and groups */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising - Dachau corridor''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy / health and well-being / blue-green infrastructure''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice through active participation in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* 48.000 inhabitants (546/km2 (2018)
* Strong developed education system
* Important religious presence
* City full of young people (16.4% below 17 years, lot of students)

* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

''Power relationships''
Authorities have the executive power (over individuals) due to the voted laws. On the other hand if individuals, when united in mind and body, they can create a voice that can influence the authorities. Industry is also an important factor of influence due to its economic impact/control, because it's creating jobs, and provides a better way of living for people.

''Shared interests''

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

Via the panel we had a look on how the other groups used the framework. It was interesting to see that they sometimes had another analytical approach or used a different way of visualizing. That broadened our horizon and gave us inspiration.
We also received some very useful feedback about how to further develop our community map to a higher level.

== Theory reflection ==
* ''From the Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning- we have learned regarding the process of how to develop ideas on storytelling in planning practice. It represents how a good story can help to overcome a critical situation of planning to reach in the desired ending as well as connect present not only to make sense of the past but also to prepare for the future through the stories.
''
*''EU Directive on public access to environmental information''<br>
The directive shows that the EU has eye for the public and its interest in the landscape, but you could say that it is a bit vage and it leave too much to the member states. There also seems to be not control on to what degree the member states implement this. Furthermore it mainly speaks about getting the information, rejecting a proposal,... but never mentions the community as an active participant in a design (cfr. Ladder of Participation).

* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-27T21:08:27Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Landscape Democracy Rationale */

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-27T21:06:40Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Landscape Democracy Rationale */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Bayern''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice in it that they will stay active in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can as well.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

In the past decades the district changed massively: The formerly rather rural area developed to a much sought-after business location with one of the lowest unemployment rates in Germany. Far more than 4,000 enterprises offer jobs to about 66,000 employees liable to contribute to social security. This is a clear indication for it that the medium-sized companies are the most important group of employers. The service providers are on top of the value creation chain. Three fourth of the economic performance are generated in trade, traffic and services, and only one percent is generated in agriculture.
and the largest hop-growing area of the world Hallertau.
The public hand correspondingly primarily invests in schools, facilities for children and elderly people as well as in the development of the public local traffic and streets.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors'
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations'
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation''
* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-27T21:06:25Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Landscape Democracy Rationale */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Bayern''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =
*''Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?''
*''Format: 3-4 sentences''

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice in it that they will stay active in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can as well.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

In the past decades the district changed massively: The formerly rather rural area developed to a much sought-after business location with one of the lowest unemployment rates in Germany. Far more than 4,000 enterprises offer jobs to about 66,000 employees liable to contribute to social security. This is a clear indication for it that the medium-sized companies are the most important group of employers. The service providers are on top of the value creation chain. Three fourth of the economic performance are generated in trade, traffic and services, and only one percent is generated in agriculture.
and the largest hop-growing area of the world Hallertau.
The public hand correspondingly primarily invests in schools, facilities for children and elderly people as well as in the development of the public local traffic and streets.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors'
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations'
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation''
* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-27T21:05:39Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Landscape Democracy Rationale */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Bayern''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =
*''Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?''
*''Format: 3-4 sentences''

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice in it that they will stay active in its protection, conserving and maintaining it as best as they can as well as managing & helping others to to influence the economic, social or environmental necessities on a positive scale.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

In the past decades the district changed massively: The formerly rather rural area developed to a much sought-after business location with one of the lowest unemployment rates in Germany. Far more than 4,000 enterprises offer jobs to about 66,000 employees liable to contribute to social security. This is a clear indication for it that the medium-sized companies are the most important group of employers. The service providers are on top of the value creation chain. Three fourth of the economic performance are generated in trade, traffic and services, and only one percent is generated in agriculture.
and the largest hop-growing area of the world Hallertau.
The public hand correspondingly primarily invests in schools, facilities for children and elderly people as well as in the development of the public local traffic and streets.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors'
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations'
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation''
* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-27T21:04:53Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Landscape Democracy Rationale */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Bayern''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =
*''Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?''
*''Format: 3-4 sentences''

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice in it that they will stay active in its protection, conserving and maintaining as best as they can. Managing & helping others to to influence the economic, social or environmental necessities on a positive scale.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

In the past decades the district changed massively: The formerly rather rural area developed to a much sought-after business location with one of the lowest unemployment rates in Germany. Far more than 4,000 enterprises offer jobs to about 66,000 employees liable to contribute to social security. This is a clear indication for it that the medium-sized companies are the most important group of employers. The service providers are on top of the value creation chain. Three fourth of the economic performance are generated in trade, traffic and services, and only one percent is generated in agriculture.
and the largest hop-growing area of the world Hallertau.
The public hand correspondingly primarily invests in schools, facilities for children and elderly people as well as in the development of the public local traffic and streets.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors'
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations'
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation''
* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]

LED2LEAP 2020 - Freising Team 7

2020-04-27T21:03:06Z

Bogdan.draghici: /* Landscape Democracy Rationale */

'''>>>back to [[LED_Online_Seminar_Working_Groups_2020|working groups overview]]'''

<div id="BackToTop" class="noprint" style="background-color:#DDEFDD; position:fixed;
bottom:32px; left:2%; z-index:9999; padding:0; margin:0;"><span style="color:blue;
font-size:8pt; font-face:verdana,sans-serif; border:0.2em outset #ceebf7;
padding:0.1em; font-weight:bolder; -moz-border-radius:8px; ">
[[#top| Back to the Top ]]</span></div>

{| align="right" width="400pt" style="background:Gainsboro; color:black"
|-
| '''Area''' ||style="background:Lavender"| ''Bayern''
|-
| '''Place''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Freising & Munich Airport area''
|-
| '''Country''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Germany''
|-
| '''Topics''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Landscape democracy''
|-
| '''Author(s)''' || style="background:Lavender"|''Farhana Afroze, Sonja De Weert, Noorjahan Begum, Bogdan Drăghici''
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"| [[File:Freising.jpg|400px]]
|-
| ||style="background:Lavender"|
|-
| colspan="3" align="center" style="background:silver"|
|}

= Landscape Democracy Rationale =
*''Why do you think this community context is relevant from a landscape democracy perspective? What is your hypothesis considering the landscape democracy challenges?''
*''Format: 3-4 sentences''

The landscape is part of the community, as is the community part of the landscape.
The community lives in the landscape, but is also shaped by it. Changes on either of them will also affect the other. Therefore it is important to include the people who live here in planning processes, so that they have a voice in it.

The community is active in its protection, conserving and maintaining as best as they can the landscape, in its management, helping to steer changes brought about by economic, social or environmental necessity, and in its planning, particularly for those areas most radically affected by change, such as peri-urban, industrial and coastal areas.

= Location and scope =

*''You can edit this map with the [[Special:MapEditor|map editor]]''
*''Next to showing us where you are, you may also use this map to localise different focus themes of your community''

{{#display_map:
|polygons=48.400832299322225,11.713214553246605:48.39171399236186,11.719394362816917:48.386698226933454,11.729007399926292:48.38168196713057,11.735873855004417:48.3606995240482,11.719394362816917:48.35294295480028,11.716647780785667:48.341990493624664,11.71184126223098:48.329666161247104,11.704974807152855:48.321448284558706,11.699481643090355:48.32099169702929,11.711154616723167:48.32281802262602,11.724200881371605:48.33149217625046,11.74205366457473:48.340164854588004,11.831317580590355:48.34609794239805,11.848483718285667:48.37164796436017,11.851230300316917:48.37894561704351,11.852603591332542:48.37073568422754,11.799045241723167:48.368454912390575,11.779819167504417:48.38533020510746,11.764712966332542:48.39718517264555,11.75853315676223:48.40037642278699,11.76951948488723:48.40721414184187,11.77775923098098:48.41815258037755,11.766086257348167:48.424076585419186,11.723514235863792:48.423620917234494,11.70634809816848:48.4090373783439,11.693301833520042~Freising & Munich Airport~ ~ ~ ~ ~#FF1F1F~0.52
}}

= Phase A: Mapping your Community =
== Freising community ==
''Location

Freising is located north of the Bavarian capital Munich, Germany.

''Characteristics
* plain, with hills in the north
* the rivers Isar, Moosach and Amper
* mainly arable lands, moorlands and forests
* Munich international airport

''Socio-economical
* Strong economy (mainly trade, traffic and services; only 1% in agriculture)
* Good community transition (from a rather rural area to an important business location)
* Low unemployment rate (more than 4000 enterprises, largest continuous hop-growing site in the world)
* Many investors and developers

In the past decades the district changed massively: The formerly rather rural area developed to a much sought-after business location with one of the lowest unemployment rates in Germany. Far more than 4,000 enterprises offer jobs to about 66,000 employees liable to contribute to social security. This is a clear indication for it that the medium-sized companies are the most important group of employers. The service providers are on top of the value creation chain. Three fourth of the economic performance are generated in trade, traffic and services, and only one percent is generated in agriculture.
and the largest hop-growing area of the world Hallertau.
The public hand correspondingly primarily invests in schools, facilities for children and elderly people as well as in the development of the public local traffic and streets.

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Airport.JPG|''Munich Airport''
File:Airport2.jpg|''Munich Airport & surrounding farmland Overview''
</gallery>

== Groups of actors and stakeholders in your community ==
*''Which groups/sub-communities are there? What are their needs and aspirations with regard to the landscape? Which groups are more visible? Which are less visible? What do we not know? (max 200 signs)''
*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">

File:Actorsgroup7.jpg|''Actors'
File:Needs.jpg|''Needs & Aspirations'
</gallery>
The Freising community includes different social groups and stakeholders like local and external. Social groups are children, students, individuals, senior citizens, differently able people, churches, different ethnic groups, and also many cultural communities. Additionally, education, agriculture, health care, restaurants, tourism, leisure-time and relaxation, small-big business groups, industries, Munich airport plays the local stakeholder role. There are some external stakeholders influences also exist from communications, forestry, authorities, developers, recycling, energy sectors, and water protection sectors, etc. All groups are either directly or indirectly connected with each other.

Regarding the landscape demands the Freising community needs some aspirations. For instance, the community requires better and clear recreation spaces, improved traffic connections (more parking places or ringway), innercity bike path connections, and also needs more public open spaces.

== Relationships between your actors and groups ==
*''How would you describe the power relationship between the groups?''
*''Which groups may have shared interests and which are these?'' (max 200 signs)

*''add 1-2 graphical representations to the image gallery based on your PPT presentation, you can add more if you like''

<gallery caption=" " widths="200px" heights="150px" perrow="5">
File:Relationships.jpg|''Actor interactions''
</gallery>

== Summary of your learnings from the transnational discussion panel on April 22 ==
''On April 22 you will present the PPT version of this first assignment to other seminar groups working in other geographical community contexts. Please give here a short summary of your learnings during this presentation, for example:
*Other analytical approaches
*Other representation styles
*Other value schemes: any surprises?
*Constructive comments we received on our presentation

== Theory reflection ==
* ''Reflect on at least three readings from the first section 'Democratic Landscape Transformation''
* ''You can choose references from our [[Reading_List_Coastal_Landscapes|reading list]]'' or suggest others
* ''Scope: 250 words''

== References ==
* ''give a full list of the references you have used for this section''
*''https://www.kreis-freising.de/''
*''http://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-bayern.php?cityid=09178124''
*''https://www.toytowngermany.com/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.freising.de/media/user_upload/61_Stadtplanung_Umwelt/6110_pdf-Files/STEP/stadtteilsteckbrief-suedwest.pdf''
*''https://www.bavaria.by/visit/freising/''
*''https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freising''
*''https://www.salaryexpert.com/cost-of-living/germany/freising''

= Phase B: Democratic Landscape Analysis and Assessment =
''* template coming''

= Phase C: Collaborative Visioning and Goal Setting =
''* template coming''

= Phase D: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Design, Transformation and Planning =
''* template coming''

= Phase E: Collaborative Evaluation and Future Agendas
''* template coming''

= Process Reflection =
*''Reflect in your intercultural and interdisciplinary team on the outcomes of your study''
*''Which limitations were you facing?''
*''What have you learnt from each other?''
*''What would you do differently next time?''
*''You can also use diagrams/visuals''
*''250 words text''

----
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study 2020]]
[[Category:LED2LEAP Case Study]]